Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueWanderers GroundsData current as of 15 October 2026

HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics

HFX Wanderers FC crest
HFX Wanderers FC
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC

HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HFX Wanderers FC played Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: Wanderers Grounds. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

HFX Wanderers FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Cavalry FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

HFX Wanderers FC scores 1.52 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Cavalry FC scores 2.04 and concedes 0.76. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HFX Wanderers FC 64%, Cavalry FC 52%. Over 2.5: HFX Wanderers FC 56%, Cavalry FC 52%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.20. HFX Wanderers FC: 10.2 shots per match, Cavalry FC: 14.8.

Match halves

HFX Wanderers FC: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.88. Cavalry FC: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

HFX Wanderers FC: 76-90+ (10 goals). Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Canadian Premier League: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-4. Average goals 2.43, BTTS 57%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cavalry FC top the table with 16 wins in 25 matches, while HFX Wanderers FC sit 6th and have won 7 games. Away from home, Cavalry win 54% of their matches, compared with HFX’s 33% win rate at home, which points to Cavalry despite HFX’s home advantage. The biggest difference is defensively: Cavalry concede an average of 0.92 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 38% of matches, compared with HFX’s 1.58 goals conceded and 25% clean-sheet rate at home. The visitors hold only a slight attacking edge — away, they score an average of 1.62 goals with an xG of 1.47, while the hosts average 1.58 goals with an xG of 1.42 at home. Both teams have earned 7 points from their last 5 matches, so although Cavalry’s stronger defence gives them the edge, a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored in 60% of their last 5 matches, with the hosts conceding an average of 1.6 goals and the visitors 1.4 over that period. Their attacking potential also supports this scenario: HFX average 2.5 goals at home, while Cavalry average 1.62 away. The hosts have failed to score in none of their home matches, whereas the visitors have drawn a blank in 23% of their away fixtures, which is the main risk for this market. Although HFX keep a clean sheet in 42% of their home matches, the recent results of both teams and average xG figures of 1.87 and 1.47 marginally favor BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 92% of HFX Wanderers matches and 62% of Cavalry matches. The hosts score an average of 2.5 goals per game and generate an xG of 1.87, although the visitors’ defence concedes an average of just 0.92 goals. Cavalry score an average of 1.62 goals, while over their last five matches, the teams have averaged 2.0 and 2.2 goals per game, respectively. At the same time, Over 2.5 goals has landed in 58% of the hosts’ matches and 46% of the visitors’ matches, making the case for this line less compelling than for Over 1.5. The projected total of 2.77 goals points to at least two goals, but does not support an equally strong recommendation on the higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: HFX went into the break level in 50% of matches, compared with 62% for Cavalry, while the visitors kept a clean sheet in the first half in 92% of games. After the break, the advantage shifts towards the hosts, who score an average of 1.75 goals then, while Cavalry concede 0.77. HFX also have the stronger attacking numbers overall, averaging 2.5 goals scored and an xG of 1.87, compared with their opponents’ 1.62 goals and 1.47 xG. The case for a home win is supported by HFX’s 75% win rate against Cavalry’s 54%, although both teams’ identical average of 1.4 points over their last five matches tempers confidence in the pick. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by an HFX win is a stronger scenario than the hosts taking the lead at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
14Shots18
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
4Shots on target3
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.58xG1.61
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
11Corners4
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
57Dangerous attacks38
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
14Fouls14
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
2Cards5
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.52Goals scored / match2.04
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.68Goals conceded / match0.76
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
48%Average possession49%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
3.6Shots on target / match5.4
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.24Shots per match14.84
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
3.6Shots on target5.4
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
14.8%Shot conversion13.7%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
48%Possession49%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.2xG for1.67
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.66xG against1.21
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

Shooting quality

HFX Wanderers FC: Efficient finishingCavalry FC: Attacking
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HFX Wanderers FC
LWWLD
Season result split
28% W24% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-12
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Cavalry FC
WDWLL
Season result split
64% W20% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-4
2.12 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 34% better for: goals scored per match.

1.52 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 2.04 goals / match - Cavalry FC

Cavalry FC is 121% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 0.76 goals / match - Cavalry FC

HFX Wanderers FC scoring profile: strong

HFX Wanderers FC scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while HFX Wanderers FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).

38Goals scored (season)51
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
42Goals conceded (season)19
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
3.2Average goals in match2.8
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
10Goals scored (last 5)11
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal88%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
40%2 goals56%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
20%3 goals32%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
8%4 goals12%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
52%2 goals8%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
28%3 goals8%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
8%4 goals0%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
HFX Wanderers FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 25 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time8%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
12%BTTS in both halves0%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
20%Scored in both halves32%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
60%BTTS - last 560%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 1.64 pts / match - Cavalry FC

HFX Wanderers FC - half-time state
28% leading40% draw32% trailing
Cavalry FC - half-time state
36% leading56% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.64
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.64
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.32Average goals (1st half)0.84
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
48%Clean sheet before half-time84%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
56%No goal before half-time60%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.84
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.96
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
40%Clean sheet after half-time52%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC
44%No goal after half-time20%
HFX Wanderers FCCavalry FC

HFX Wanderers FC - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cavalry FC - second-half results

48% W40% D12% L
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

HFX Wanderers FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Cavalry FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HFX Wanderers FC
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
5
6
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
8
46-60
6
8
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
6
2
16-30
4
1
31-45
8
3
46-60
11
5
61-75
16
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HFX Wanderers FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

HFX Wanderers FCLigaCavalry FC
Average goals in match• 3.203.13▼ 2.80
Both teams scored▲ 64%62%▼ 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 56%57%▼ 52%
Clean sheets• 20%20%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 72%67%▼ 48%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%83%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HFX Wanderers FCGoalJason BahamboulaAssist: Miguel Arilla
  2. Cavalry FCYellow cardDaan Klomp
  3. Cavalry FCYellow cardEryk Kobza
  4. Cavalry FCGoalCaniggia Ginola Elva
  5. Cavalry FCGoalAli MusseAssist: Tobias Warschewski
  6. HFX Wanderers FCSubstitutionOn: Sven ZitmanOff: Lucas Olguin
  7. HFX Wanderers FCSubstitutionOn: Nelson PierreOff: Liam Mackenzie
  8. HFX Wanderers FCYellow cardSven Zitman
  9. Cavalry FCYellow cardBradley Kamdem Fewo
  10. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Goteh NtigneeOff: Ali Musse
  11. Cavalry FCRed cardHarry Paton
  12. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Maël HenryOff: Caniggia Ginola Elva
  13. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Curtis OforiOff: Nathaniel Edwards
  14. HFX Wanderers FCGoalThomas Meilleur-GiguèreAssist: Ryan Telfer
  15. HFX Wanderers FCYellow cardLorenzo Callegari

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): HFX Wanderers FC 0 - 3 - 4 Cavalry FC. Average goals 2.43, both teams scored in 57% matches.

HFX Wanderers FC
1 : 3
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 1
HFX Wanderers FC
Cavalry FC
2 : 0
HFX Wanderers FC
Cavalry FC
3 : 1
HFX Wanderers FC
Cavalry FC
0 : 0
HFX Wanderers FC
HFX Wanderers FC
1 : 1
Cavalry FC
HFX Wanderers FC
0 : 3
Cavalry FC

FAQ

What was the result of HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished HFX Wanderers FC 2:2 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HFX Wanderers FC and Cavalry FC?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches HFX Wanderers FC won 0, Cavalry FC won 4 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC?

HFX Wanderers FC score 1.52 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 2.04. The Canadian Premier League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 64% of HFX Wanderers FC's matches and 52% of Cavalry FC's.

What form are HFX Wanderers FC and Cavalry FC in?

Over the last 5 games HFX Wanderers FC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cavalry FC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC?

The statistical background for HFX Wanderers FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.