HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics
HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
HFX Wanderers FC played Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 26 June 2026. Venue: Wanderers Grounds. Final score: 5:2.
Current form
HFX Wanderers FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pacific FC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
HFX Wanderers FC scores 0.90 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: HFX Wanderers FC 50%, Pacific FC 70%. Over 2.5: HFX Wanderers FC 40%, Pacific FC 70%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Pacific FC has higher xG: 1.07 vs 0.92. HFX Wanderers FC: 8.6 shots per match, Pacific FC: 9.3.
Match halves
HFX Wanderers FC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.70. Pacific FC: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
HFX Wanderers FC: 46-60 (3 goals). Pacific FC: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
HFX Wanderers have a clear advantage in chance creation and chance quality: at home they average 10.25 shots per match, of which 3.5 are on target, and have an average xG of 1.19, while Pacific on the road record 6.5 shots, 2.0 on target and xG 0.61. Defensively the hosts also fare better — HFX concede 1.5 goals per home match on average, and Pacific concede 2.0 goals away; in the last 5 fixtures HFX have conceded 5 goals, while Pacific as many as 9. Form corroborates the home advantage: HFX collect 0.8 points per match in the last 5 games versus 0.4 for Pacific, the visitors have no away wins (0 wins), and 25% of their away matches end with them failing to score compared to 0% of matches without a goal for HFX at home. Pacific do have a higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 12%) and have scored 4 goals in the last 5 matches versus HFX’s 2, but their lower xG (0.61) and fewer shots on target indicate lower quality of scoring chances. Based on this I tip a home win, as superior shot metrics, higher xG and a lower average of goals conceded in home matches give HFX the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 70% versus 30% for No, because the seasonal indicators strongly favor both teams scoring. This season HFX has BTTS at 67% and Pacific 75%, versus a league average of 56%, indicating an above-average likelihood of Goal/Goal. Both sides concede on average 2.0 goals per game and have 0% clean sheets this season, so their matches routinely feature conceded goals. HFX creates more chances (11.17 shots and 3.33 shots on target vs 6.5 and 2.0 for Pacific) and posts a higher xG of 1.3 versus 0.61, increasing the hosts’ scoring probability despite weaker last 5 form (0.4 goals average). Pacific’s last 5 show BTTS 60% with 0.8 scored and 1.8 conceded on average, so while there is some uncertainty, the overall seasonal edge (67%/75%) and absence of clean sheets lead me to choose Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows the home side have xG_for 1.30, the visitors 0.61, while defenses concede on average xG_against 1.87 (HFX) and 1.89 (Pacific); averaged expected goals are about 1.60 for HFX and 1.24 for Pacific, totaling 2.84 goals. Under a Poisson distribution with λ=2.84 the probability of Over 1.5 (≥2 goals) is approximately 77.6% (~78%), Over 2.5 (≥3 goals) is ~54%, and Over 3.5 only ~32%. Seasonal indicators confirm a tendency for goals: Over 0.5 is 100% for both teams, Over 1.5 is 67% for the hosts and 100% for the guests, and BTTS rates are 67% and 75%. HFX averages 11.17 shots and 3.33 on target, Pacific 6.5 and 2.0; despite Pacific’s higher conversion rate (15% vs 9%), the lower volume of attempts translates into a lower xG for the visitors, and the absence of clean sheets (0% for both) increases the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal is the Over 1.5 line (recommendation: Over 1.5), as it provides the largest probability buffer (~78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to HT/FT 2/2 — Pacific FC leading at the break and winning the match. Pacific led at half in 75% of their matches versus HFX in only 17% (75% vs 17%), and in the last five meetings the away side led at the break in 60% of cases. In the first half the visitors average 0.75 goals compared to 0.17 for the home side (scoredAVGHT_away 0.75 vs scoredAVGHT_home 0.17), and although HFX generates more xG (1.30 vs 0.61) and more shots (11.17 vs 6.5), their conversion rate is lower (9% vs 15%), which favors Pacific in capitalizing on chances. Additionally, the home team concedes many goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_home 1.5 and as many as 5 goals in minutes 76–90), while HFX most often scores in 46–75 (2+2 = 4 goals in 46–75), suggesting that even during attempts to mount a comeback the defense is exposed and the visitors have a chance to hold their lead. Finally, note that the home side scores in 67% of matches and the away side in 75% (i.e. both teams frequently find the net), so I anticipate a Pacific win with goals at both ends, making 2/2 the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| HFX Wanderers FC | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
HFX Wanderers FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 0.4 pts / match - Pacific FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pacific FC is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
0.9 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 1 goals / match - Pacific FC
HFX Wanderers FC is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 2 goals / match - Pacific FC
HFX Wanderers FC scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).
Pacific FC scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while HFX Wanderers FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - HFX Wanderers FC
Over / Under - Pacific FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pacific FC is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 1.5 pts / match - Pacific FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
HFX Wanderers FC - second-half results
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pacific FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
HFX Wanderers FC
Pacific FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| HFX Wanderers FC | Liga | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.30 | 2.64 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 46% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 51% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): HFX Wanderers FC 2 - 2 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished HFX Wanderers FC 5:2 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches HFX Wanderers FC won 2, Pacific FC won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
HFX Wanderers FC score 0.90 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of HFX Wanderers FC's matches and 70% of Pacific FC's.
What form are HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC in?
Over the last 5 games HFX Wanderers FC have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pacific FC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?
The statistical background for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


