Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueWanderers GroundsData current as of 09 September 2026

HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics

HFX Wanderers FC crest
HFX Wanderers FC
5 : 2half-time 2:1
Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

HFX Wanderers FC played Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 26 June 2026. Venue: Wanderers Grounds. Final score: 5:2.

Current form

HFX Wanderers FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pacific FC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

HFX Wanderers FC scores 0.90 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: HFX Wanderers FC 50%, Pacific FC 70%. Over 2.5: HFX Wanderers FC 40%, Pacific FC 70%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Pacific FC has higher xG: 1.07 vs 0.92. HFX Wanderers FC: 8.6 shots per match, Pacific FC: 9.3.

Match halves

HFX Wanderers FC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.70. Pacific FC: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

HFX Wanderers FC: 46-60 (3 goals). Pacific FC: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Canadian Premier League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

HFX Wanderers have a clear advantage in chance creation and chance quality: at home they average 10.25 shots per match, of which 3.5 are on target, and have an average xG of 1.19, while Pacific on the road record 6.5 shots, 2.0 on target and xG 0.61. Defensively the hosts also fare better — HFX concede 1.5 goals per home match on average, and Pacific concede 2.0 goals away; in the last 5 fixtures HFX have conceded 5 goals, while Pacific as many as 9. Form corroborates the home advantage: HFX collect 0.8 points per match in the last 5 games versus 0.4 for Pacific, the visitors have no away wins (0 wins), and 25% of their away matches end with them failing to score compared to 0% of matches without a goal for HFX at home. Pacific do have a higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 12%) and have scored 4 goals in the last 5 matches versus HFX’s 2, but their lower xG (0.61) and fewer shots on target indicate lower quality of scoring chances. Based on this I tip a home win, as superior shot metrics, higher xG and a lower average of goals conceded in home matches give HFX the edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 70% versus 30% for No, because the seasonal indicators strongly favor both teams scoring. This season HFX has BTTS at 67% and Pacific 75%, versus a league average of 56%, indicating an above-average likelihood of Goal/Goal. Both sides concede on average 2.0 goals per game and have 0% clean sheets this season, so their matches routinely feature conceded goals. HFX creates more chances (11.17 shots and 3.33 shots on target vs 6.5 and 2.0 for Pacific) and posts a higher xG of 1.3 versus 0.61, increasing the hosts’ scoring probability despite weaker last 5 form (0.4 goals average). Pacific’s last 5 show BTTS 60% with 0.8 scored and 1.8 conceded on average, so while there is some uncertainty, the overall seasonal edge (67%/75%) and absence of clean sheets lead me to choose Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis shows the home side have xG_for 1.30, the visitors 0.61, while defenses concede on average xG_against 1.87 (HFX) and 1.89 (Pacific); averaged expected goals are about 1.60 for HFX and 1.24 for Pacific, totaling 2.84 goals. Under a Poisson distribution with λ=2.84 the probability of Over 1.5 (≥2 goals) is approximately 77.6% (~78%), Over 2.5 (≥3 goals) is ~54%, and Over 3.5 only ~32%. Seasonal indicators confirm a tendency for goals: Over 0.5 is 100% for both teams, Over 1.5 is 67% for the hosts and 100% for the guests, and BTTS rates are 67% and 75%. HFX averages 11.17 shots and 3.33 on target, Pacific 6.5 and 2.0; despite Pacific’s higher conversion rate (15% vs 9%), the lower volume of attempts translates into a lower xG for the visitors, and the absence of clean sheets (0% for both) increases the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal is the Over 1.5 line (recommendation: Over 1.5), as it provides the largest probability buffer (~78%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to HT/FT 2/2 — Pacific FC leading at the break and winning the match. Pacific led at half in 75% of their matches versus HFX in only 17% (75% vs 17%), and in the last five meetings the away side led at the break in 60% of cases. In the first half the visitors average 0.75 goals compared to 0.17 for the home side (scoredAVGHT_away 0.75 vs scoredAVGHT_home 0.17), and although HFX generates more xG (1.30 vs 0.61) and more shots (11.17 vs 6.5), their conversion rate is lower (9% vs 15%), which favors Pacific in capitalizing on chances. Additionally, the home team concedes many goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_home 1.5 and as many as 5 goals in minutes 76–90), while HFX most often scores in 46–75 (2+2 = 4 goals in 46–75), suggesting that even during attempts to mount a comeback the defense is exposed and the visitors have a chance to hold their lead. Finally, note that the home side scores in 67% of matches and the away side in 75% (i.e. both teams frequently find the net), so I anticipate a Pacific win with goals at both ends, making 2/2 the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
13Shots15
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
4Shots on target6
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
1.52xG1.71
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
10Corners4
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
57Dangerous attacks47
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
13Fouls6
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
2Cards0
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.9Goals scored / match1
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
1.4Goals conceded / match2
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
44%Average possession51%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
2.8Shots on target / match2.8
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.6Shots per match9.3
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
2.8Shots on target2.8
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
10.5%Shot conversion10.8%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
44%Possession51%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.92xG for1.07
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
1.73xG against1.87
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

Shooting quality

HFX Wanderers FC: BalancedPacific FC: Balanced
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HFX Wanderers FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 0.4 pts / match - Pacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC
LDWLL
Season result split
20% W30% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 at home
1-2-1
DLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Pacific FC
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W30% D70% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-7
0.30 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
DLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pacific FC is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 1 goals / match - Pacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 2 goals / match - Pacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC scoring profile: very strong

HFX Wanderers FC scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).

Pacific FC scoring profile: very strong

Pacific FC scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while HFX Wanderers FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

9Goals scored (season)10
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
14Goals conceded (season)20
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
2.3Average goals in match3
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
2Goals scored (last 5)4
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
20%2 goals30%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%3 goals0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%4 goals0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
50%2 goals70%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
10%3 goals30%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%4 goals0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%Scored in both halves20%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
20%BTTS - last 560%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pacific FC is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / match - HFX Wanderers FC · 1.5 pts / match - Pacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing
Pacific FC - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per match (1st half)1.5
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.7
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
40%Clean sheet before half-time70%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
80%No goal before half-time60%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.2
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.7
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.3
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
40%Clean sheet after half-time0%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC
50%No goal after half-time50%
HFX Wanderers FCPacific FC

HFX Wanderers FC - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pacific FC - second-half results

0% W20% D80% L
15
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.4

Concedes 1.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

HFX Wanderers FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Pacific FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.8
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3-8
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

HFX Wanderers FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
4
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
7
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

HFX Wanderers FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

HFX Wanderers FCLigaPacific FC
Average goals in match 2.302.64 3.00
Both teams scored 50%56% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%46% 70%
Clean sheets 20%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 60%51% 70%
Goal after half-time 80%87% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pacific FCGoalEric Lajeunesse
  2. HFX Wanderers FCGoalMiguel Arilla
  3. Pacific FCGoalMarco BustosAssist: Yann Régis Toualy
  4. HFX Wanderers FCSubstitutionOn: Francesco TroisiOff: Kareem Sow
  5. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Matthew BaldisimoOff: Ronan Kratt
  6. HFX Wanderers FCYellow cardLucas Olguin
  7. HFX Wanderers FCYellow cardLorenzo Callegari
  8. Pacific FCGoalKadin Chung
  9. HFX Wanderers FCGoalIsaiah JohnstonAssist: Miguel Arilla
  10. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Aidan DanielsOff: Marco Bustos
  11. HFX Wanderers FCSubstitutionOn: Andre RampersadOff: Lucas Olguin
  12. HFX Wanderers FCSubstitutionOn: Jason BahamboulaOff: Isaiah Johnston
  13. HFX Wanderers FCGoalTavio Ciccarelli

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): HFX Wanderers FC 2 - 2 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.

HFX Wanderers FC
2 : 2
Pacific FC
HFX Wanderers FC
3 : 0
Pacific FC
Pacific FC
2 : 2
HFX Wanderers FC
Pacific FC
3 : 2
HFX Wanderers FC
HFX Wanderers FC
3 : 1
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished HFX Wanderers FC 5:2 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches HFX Wanderers FC won 2, Pacific FC won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?

HFX Wanderers FC score 0.90 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of HFX Wanderers FC's matches and 70% of Pacific FC's.

What form are HFX Wanderers FC and Pacific FC in?

Over the last 5 games HFX Wanderers FC have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pacific FC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC?

The statistical background for HFX Wanderers FC vs Pacific FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.