Hillerød vs Lyngby: match statistics
Hillerød vs Lyngby: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hillerød played Lyngby in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Hillerød: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Lyngby: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hillerød scores 1.36 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Lyngby scores 2.16 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hillerød 68%, Lyngby 60%. Over 2.5: Hillerød 56%, Lyngby 68%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Lyngby has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.39. Hillerød: 11.6 shots per match, Lyngby: 13.8.
Match halves
Hillerød: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.64. Lyngby: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.28.
Goals by minute
Hillerød: 16-30 (7 goals). Lyngby: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1st Division: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lyngby are the favorites: they sit 1st and have scored 54 goals this season versus Hillerød’s 34, and in the last 5 matches they have 12 goals compared to the hosts’ 4. The visitors are also more efficient — away conversion rate 17% versus 12% for the hosts, with average goals per game 2.17 away vs 1.33 for Hillerød. Hillerød’s strong point is home defence: they concede only 0.83 goals per game at home and have 33% clean sheets, while Lyngby concede 1.33 on the road and have shipped 7 goals in their last 5 fixtures. The quality of created chances is similar (xG at home 1.43 for Hillerød vs 1.57 for Lyngby away), and possession and shots are nearly even (52% and 11.42 vs 53% and 13), so efficiency will be decisive. Considering the higher total goals this season (54 vs 34), better shot efficiency and higher points-per-game in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.4), I give Lyngby the greater probability, although the hosts’ solid defence increases the likelihood of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high BTTS rates this season: Hillerød 62% and Lyngby 58% vs league average 54%, indicating a tendency for reciprocal scoring. Lyngby are very attacking recently — BTTS 80% in their last 5 matches and averaging 2.4 goals (12 in 5), while Hillerød have BTTS 40% in their last 5 and average 0.8 goals (4 in 5), which weakens the home side. Seasonal xG and shots indicate chances are created by both sides: xG 1.74 for Hillerød vs 1.57 for Lyngby and on average 5.46 and 4.83 shots on target per match, supporting the possibility of Goal/Goal. Hillerød concede 0.92 goals per match with 38% clean sheets, and Lyngby concede 1.33 goals, so there is a real risk of the hosts conceding. Given seasonal BTTS above 54% and Lyngby’s strong attacking form, I assess BTTS - Yes as more likely (67% vs 33%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combines teams’ xG and opponent defensive strength: Hillerød expected 1.56 goals (attacking xG 1.74 vs Lyngby’s conceded xG 1.38), Lyngby expected 1.34 goals (attacking xG 1.57 vs Hillerød’s conceded xG 1.11), totaling 2.90 goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.90 yields roughly a 79% chance of Over 1.5 goals (P(0)+P(1)≈21%), about 55% for Over 2.5 and about 33% for Over 3.5. Season-long stats confirm a goal-oriented trend: Hillerød has 92% of matches Over 1.5, Lyngby 83%; both teams also show high Over 2.5 rates (Hillerød 69%, Lyngby 67%), and Both Teams To Score rates of 62% for Hillerød and 58% for Lyngby. In the last 5 matches Lyngby averages 2.4 goals and has 80% Over 2.5, while Hillerød averages 0.8 goals in their last 5, suggesting the visitors could significantly boost the total goals. Therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 (line 1.5) as the strongest signal: 79% per the model and supported by season figures 92%/83%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I’m backing HT/FT 1/1 (Hillerød leading at the break and winning) as the most likely scenario. Hillerød led at half-time in 46% of matches and average 0.92 goals scored by the break while conceding only 0.46, whereas Lyngby average 0.83 scored and 0.92 conceded by half-time, yielding a HT balance of +0.46 for the home side versus -0.09 for the visitors. Over the full match Hillerød record 2.08 points per game and a 62% home win rate; they also generate higher xG (1.74 vs 1.57), more shots (14.54 vs 13.0) and more shots on target (5.46 vs 4.83), which increases the likelihood of them maintaining a lead. Caution is warranted, however, because Lyngby have been in good form over the last five matches (60% wins and 9 first-half goals in those five) and have scored 9 goals in minutes 76–90, which raises the risk of a second-half turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hillerød | Lyngby | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lyngby is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Hillerød · 2 pts / match - Lyngby
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lyngby is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - Hillerød · 2.16 goals / match - Lyngby
Lyngby is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Hillerød · 1.12 goals / match - Lyngby
Hillerød scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).
Lyngby scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Hillerød keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hillerød
Over / Under - Lyngby
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lyngby is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Hillerød · 1.52 pts / match - Lyngby
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hillerød - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lyngby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hillerød
Lyngby
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Hillerød | Liga | Lyngby | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.56 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 72% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 79% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Hillerød 2 - 0 - 0 Lyngby. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Hillerød vs Lyngby?
The 1st Division match finished Hillerød 1:3 Lyngby. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hillerød and Lyngby?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hillerød won 2, Lyngby won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hillerød vs Lyngby?
Hillerød score 1.36 goals per game on average and Lyngby 2.16. The 1st Division average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Hillerød's matches and 60% of Lyngby's.
What form are Hillerød and Lyngby in?
Over the last 5 games Hillerød have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Lyngby 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hillerød vs Lyngby?
The statistical background for Hillerød vs Lyngby — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


