Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildHásteinsvöllurData current as of 02 November 2026

ÍBV vs Valur: match statistics

ÍBV crest
ÍBV
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Valur crest
Valur

ÍBV vs Valur: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ÍBV played Valur in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

ÍBV: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Valur: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

ÍBV scores 1.39 and concedes 2.04 goals per match. Valur scores 1.87 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ÍBV 70%, Valur 74%. Over 2.5: ÍBV 61%, Valur 74%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Valur has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.46. ÍBV: 12.8 shots per match, Valur: 15.9.

Match halves

ÍBV: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.83. Valur: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

ÍBV: 76-90+ (8 goals). Valur: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.86 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Valur come into this match in clearly better form: they have collected 8 points in their last five games, winning twice and losing only once, while ÍBV have managed just 1 point and remain without a victory. The visitors have scored 12 goals during this period, compared with only 3 for the hosts, strongly indicating Valur’s superior attacking efficiency. Away from home, Valur average 1.59 xG and 5.27 shots on target per match, compared with ÍBV’s 1.47 xG and 4.55 shots on target at home. The hosts concede an average of 1.91 goals on their own turf and have kept a clean sheet in just 9% of matches, so their defence should struggle against the visitors’ in-form attack. ÍBV’s chances are boosted by the fact that Valur allow opponents a high average xG of 2.23 away from home, but current form and the attacking advantage point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by the defensive profile of both teams: ÍBV concede an average of 2.33 goals per match, while Valur concede 1.64, with only 8% and 9% of their matches ending with a clean sheet, respectively. ÍBV have scored in every match of the season, with an average xG of 2.05; additionally, Valur allow their opponents an average of 2.23 xG. Valur have been in significantly better attacking form over their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and recording BTTS in 80% of those games, while ÍBV have conceded 1.8 goals per match during the same period. The main risk to the pick is the hosts’ poor recent finishing, having scored just 3 goals across their last five league fixtures and recording BTTS in 40% of them. However, ÍBV’s season-long 92% BTTS rate and Valur’s defensive weakness still provide stronger support for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: ÍBV averaged 2.17 goals scored but conceded as many as 2.33 per game, while Valur averages 1.55 goals scored. Both defenses allow high-quality chances, with opponents’ average xG standing at 2.16 for ÍBV and 2.23 for Valur. In their last five matches, Valur scored 12 goals, or 2.4 per game, while ÍBV conceded 1.8 goals per match during the same period. At least two goals were scored in all of ÍBV’s matches and in 73% of Valur’s games, while the Icelandic league averages 3.87 goals per match. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as even with ÍBV’s recent decline in finishing efficiency, the defensive data and Valur’s form clearly limit the risk of a very low-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario points to Valur leading at the break and winning the match, as ÍBV concede an average of 1.33 goals before half-time, while Valur have conceded only 0.64 in this period. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored just 0.2 goals before the break and were trailing at half-time in 80% of games. Valur are in clearly better current form: across their last five appearances, they have averaged 2.4 goals, earned 1.6 points per match and lost only once, whereas ÍBV have averaged 0.6 goals and 0.2 points. After the interval, the visitors’ advantage remains significant, with Valur recently averaging 1.8 goals in second halves and winning them in 60% of cases, compared with ÍBV’s 0.4 goals and no such wins. Although the hosts have a high seasonal xG of 2.05, their poor recent finishing and a defence allowing an average of 2.16 xG support the expectation that Valur will maintain their lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
ÍBVValur
20Shots13
ÍBVValur
7Shots on target5
ÍBVValur
2.17xG1.48
ÍBVValur
7Corners1
ÍBVValur
59Dangerous attacks43
ÍBVValur
11Fouls19
ÍBVValur
4Cards3
ÍBVValur

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.39Goals scored / match1.87
ÍBVValur
2.04Goals conceded / match2
ÍBVValur
50%Average possession50%
ÍBVValur
4.13Shots on target / match5.87
ÍBVValur

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.78Shots per match15.87
ÍBVValur
4.13Shots on target5.87
ÍBVValur
10.9%Shot conversion11.8%
ÍBVValur
50%Possession50%
ÍBVValur
1.46xG for1.83
ÍBVValur
1.59xG against2.19
ÍBVValur

Shooting quality

ÍBV: BalancedValur: Attacking
ÍBVValur
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Valur is 700% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.6 pts / match - Valur

ÍBV
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W26% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-13
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Valur
DLDWW
Season result split
39% W13% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.28Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Valur is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - ÍBV · 1.87 goals / match - Valur

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).

Valur scoring profile: very strong

Valur scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).

32Goals scored (season)43
ÍBVValur
47Goals conceded (season)46
ÍBVValur
3.43Average goals in match3.87
ÍBVValur
3Goals scored (last 5)12
ÍBVValur
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
ÍBVValur

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal83%
ÍBVValur
39%2 goals57%
ÍBVValur
9%3 goals30%
ÍBVValur
9%4 goals17%
ÍBVValur

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal91%
ÍBVValur
61%2 goals61%
ÍBVValur
17%3 goals30%
ÍBVValur
13%4 goals13%
ÍBVValur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time35%
ÍBVValur
9%BTTS in both halves9%
ÍBVValur
22%Scored in both halves43%
ÍBVValur

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS70%
ÍBVValur
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ÍBVValur
40%BTTS - last 580%
ÍBVValur

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
ÍBVValur
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
ÍBVValur
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
ÍBVValur

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
ÍBVValur
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
ÍBVValur
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
ÍBVValur

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Valur is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.3 pts / match - Valur

ÍBV - half-time state
22% leading30% draw48% trailing
Valur - half-time state
30% leading39% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per match (1st half)1.3
ÍBVValur
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.87
ÍBVValur
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)1
ÍBVValur
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.87
ÍBVValur
35%Clean sheet before half-time43%
ÍBVValur
61%No goal before half-time35%
ÍBVValur

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.22
ÍBVValur
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1
ÍBVValur
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ÍBVValur
1.91Average goals (2nd half)2
ÍBVValur
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
ÍBVValur
43%No goal after half-time39%
ÍBVValur

ÍBV - second-half results

22% W35% D43% L
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding77%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Valur - second-half results

30% W30% D39% L
30
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ÍBV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Valur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.62.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
10
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
12
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Valur
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
9
8
16-30
5
8
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Valur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ÍBVLigaValur
Average goals in match▼ 3.433.86• 3.87
Both teams scored• 70%71%▲ 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 61%70%▲ 74%
Clean sheets▼ 4%16%▼ 9%
Goal before half-time• 83%82%▲ 87%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%86%• 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.86
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.13
Home goals / match
1.73
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ValurYellow cardShkelzen Veseli
  2. ÍBVSubstitutionOn: Sesar Örn HarðarsonOff: Aron Lucas Vokes
  3. ValurSubstitutionOn: Patrick PedersenOff: Shkelzen Veseli
  4. ValurYellow cardMyles Veldman
  5. ÍBVYellow cardRóbert Elís Hlynsson
  6. ÍBVYellow cardAlex Freyr Hilmarsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): ÍBV 2 - 0 - 2 Valur. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

ÍBV
1 : 0
Valur
Valur
2 : 1
ÍBV
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
4 : 1
Valur Reykjavík
Valur Reykjavík
3 : 0
ÍB Vestmannaeyja

FAQ

What was the result of ÍBV vs Valur?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 1:1 Valur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and Valur?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 2, Valur won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs Valur?

ÍBV score 1.39 goals per game on average and Valur 1.87. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 70% of ÍBV's matches and 74% of Valur's.

What form are ÍBV and Valur in?

Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Valur 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs Valur?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.