Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 31 August 2026

Ilirija vs Rudar: match statistics

Ilirija crest
Ilirija
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Rudar crest
Rudar

Ilirija vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilirija played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Ilirija: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Rudar: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilirija scores 3.50 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilirija 0%, Rudar 0%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 50%, Rudar 50%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Ilirija has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.55. Ilirija: 14.0 shots per match, Rudar: 12.5.

Match halves

Ilirija: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.50. Rudar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Ilirija: 76-90+ (3 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilirija sit 1st, having won both of their league matches so far, and have recorded 3 wins in their last five games, while Rudar have managed just 1 win, 1 draw and 3 defeats over the same period. The hosts are perfect at home: they have won 100% of their matches, have not conceded a goal there, and Rudar lost their only away fixture while averaging 0 goals scored on the road. Rudar do average 15 shots and have an away xG of 1.85, but this has not translated into attacking efficiency, as they have failed to score in 100% of their away matches. Ilirija have enjoyed greater possession, 59% compared with 51%, and the home advantage, combined with a significantly more stable defence, points towards a home win. However, it should be noted that the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.69, so the most likely outcome appears to be a relatively low-scoring but controlled Ilirija victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as Ilirija have not conceded a goal in the season data and have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches. Rudar have failed to score during this period, with 100% of their matches ending without a goal scored and a shot conversion rate of 0%, despite averaging 5 shots on target per match. In their last five appearances, the hosts conceded just 0.8 goals per game, while their BTTS rate was only 20%. Rudar have improved to 1.2 goals scored across their last five matches, and their xG stands at 1.69, but they face an Ilirija defence with a seasonal xG against of 1.00. In addition, the league BTTS rate is only 38%, making a scenario in which at least one team fails to score the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ilirija have averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last five matches, while Rudar have conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period, which supports at least two goals for the home side or a high-scoring contribution from the hosts. However, Rudar create chances worth an average of 1.69 xG and record 5 shots on target per match, while Ilirija’s recent defensive performances have allowed opponents 1.45 xG. In the current data, both teams have had 100% of their matches finish with at least 2 goals, although the small sample size calls for greater caution with higher lines. Over 2.5 goals landed in 40% of Ilirija’s matches and 60% of Rudar’s over their last five games, making the 2.5 line close to balanced. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.65 goals provides a clear margin above the required two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Ilirija victory, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches, while Rudar were trailing at that stage in 60%. Ilirija averaged 1.8 goals scored and conceded just 0.8 per match during this run, whereas Rudar scored 1.2 and allowed 1.6. The second half should be decisive: the hosts averaged 1.2 goals after the break and conceded none, while the visitors conceded an average of 0.8 goals in the second half. In addition, Ilirija won 60% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for Rudar, while the home data shows a perfect winning record and an average of 3.0 goals scored per game. Rudar’s higher xG, 1.85 compared with 1.24, reduces confidence in the selection, but their failure to score and a defence allowing 1.89 xG point to a greater chance of Ilirija completing the turnaround after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
IlirijaRudar
22Shots7
IlirijaRudar
10Shots on target1
IlirijaRudar
2.46xG0.83
IlirijaRudar
8Corners7
IlirijaRudar
52Dangerous attacks43
IlirijaRudar
17Fouls12
IlirijaRudar
0Cards0
IlirijaRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.5Goals scored / match1.5
IlirijaRudar
0Goals conceded / match1
IlirijaRudar
62%Average possession52%
IlirijaRudar
4Shots on target / match4
IlirijaRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match12.5
IlirijaRudar
4Shots on target4
IlirijaRudar
25%Shot conversion12%
IlirijaRudar
62%Possession52%
IlirijaRudar
1.71xG for1.55
IlirijaRudar
1.27xG against1.44
IlirijaRudar

Shooting quality

Ilirija: DominantRudar: Balanced
IlirijaRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)29%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.880.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilirija is 100% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Ilirija · 1.5 pts / match - Rudar

Ilirija
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.5Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Rudar
LW
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilirija is 133% better for: goals scored per match.

3.5 goals / match - Ilirija · 1.5 goals / match - Rudar

Ilirija scoring profile: very strong

Ilirija scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: more difficult

Rudar scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).

7Goals scored (season)3
IlirijaRudar
0Goals conceded (season)2
IlirijaRudar
3.5Average goals in match2.5
IlirijaRudar
7Goals scored (last 5)3
IlirijaRudar
0Goals conceded (last 5)2
IlirijaRudar

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
IlirijaRudar
50%2 goals50%
IlirijaRudar
50%3 goals50%
IlirijaRudar
50%4 goals0%
IlirijaRudar

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal50%
IlirijaRudar
0%2 goals50%
IlirijaRudar
0%3 goals0%
IlirijaRudar
0%4 goals0%
IlirijaRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
IlirijaRudar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
IlirijaRudar
50%Scored in both halves0%
IlirijaRudar

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
IlirijaRudar
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
IlirijaRudar
0%BTTS - last 50%
IlirijaRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
IlirijaRudar
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
IlirijaRudar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
IlirijaRudar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
IlirijaRudar
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
IlirijaRudar
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
IlirijaRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilirija is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Ilirija · 0.5 pts / match - Rudar

Ilirija - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.5
IlirijaRudar
1Goals scored (1st half)0
IlirijaRudar
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
IlirijaRudar
1Average goals (1st half)0.5
IlirijaRudar
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
IlirijaRudar
50%No goal before half-time100%
IlirijaRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)1.5
IlirijaRudar
2.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
IlirijaRudar
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
IlirijaRudar
2.5Average goals (2nd half)2
IlirijaRudar
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
IlirijaRudar
0%No goal after half-time50%
IlirijaRudar

Ilirija - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilirija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match1.02.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.02.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match0.52.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilirija
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
0%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilirija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+3.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
273%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

IlirijaLigaRudar
Average goals in match 3.502.61 2.50
Both teams scored 0%39% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 50%
Clean sheets 100%33% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%72% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%89% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ilirija 0 - 2 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
0 : 0
ND Ilirija 1911
ND Ilirija 1911
2 : 2
NK Rudar Velenje

FAQ

What was the result of Ilirija vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Ilirija 2:0 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilirija and Rudar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ilirija won 0, Rudar won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilirija vs Rudar?

Ilirija score 3.50 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.50. The 2. SNL average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Ilirija's matches and 0% of Rudar's.

What form are Ilirija and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Ilirija have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Rudar 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilirija vs Rudar?

The statistical background for Ilirija vs Rudar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.