Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 15 October 2026

Ilves vs HJK: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
1 : 2half-time 0:0
HJK crest
HJK

Ilves vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 31 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Ilves: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. HJK: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.57 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. HJK scores 1.62 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 57%, HJK 38%. Over 2.5: Ilves 62%, HJK 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

HJK has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.40. Ilves: 11.5 shots per match, HJK: 13.0.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.67. HJK: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (7 goals). HJK: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 4.60, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 60% of their matches there, score an average of 1.6 goals and concede just 0.9, keeping a clean sheet in 60% of games. HJK also score 1.6 goals per away match, but lose 40% of such fixtures and fail to score in 30% of them, which could be a problem against the hosts’ well-organised defence. The visitors do create slightly more high-quality chances, however, with an average xG of 1.53 compared with Ilves’ 1.28, while also registering 12.9 shots per match to their opponents’ 9.6. Current form gives HJK a slight edge, as they have scored 7 goals and averaged 1.4 points per match across their last five league games, while Ilves have managed just 5 goals and 0.8 points. Despite their weaker recent run, Ilves’ home advantage and significantly stronger defence give the hosts a slight edge to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal statistics clearly point towards a low BTTS profile: Ilves recorded both teams scoring in 36% of matches, while HJK did so in 40%, compared with the league average of 50%. Ilves kept a clean sheet in 45% of matches, while HJK failed to score in 30% of their appearances, so there is a realistic path to a scenario in which one side remains scoreless. In their last five league matches, Ilves scored just 5 goals, averaging 1.0 per game, with a low xG of 0.99, while HJK's defence conceded just 1.12 xG on average. HJK are more likely to score because Ilves allowed opponents 2.13 xG across their last five matches; however, the hosts' weaker current attacking output provides stronger support for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have the seasonal attacking potential to score more than 1.5 goals per match: Ilves average 1.64 goals, while HJK average 1.60. HJK create an average of 1.53 xG, while Ilves’ defense allows as much as 1.52 xG, supporting the visitors’ chances of scoring at least once. Ilves have been less effective in attack recently, averaging 1.0 goal and 0.99 xG across their last five matches, but HJK have conceded in 70% of their games this season. The 1.5 line offers a clearer edge than 2.5, as over 1.5 goals were scored in 64% of Ilves matches and 80% of HJK matches, while recent form limits confidence in a high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an HJK victory at the final whistle, as HJK have not conceded a single goal before the break in their last five matches, while Ilves have averaged just 0.8 first-half goals during that period. However, the hosts have been dangerous from the start of the season, leading at the break in 55% of their matches and conceding an average of only 0.45 goals in the first half, which increases the likelihood of an evenly contested opening period. Current form more clearly favours the visitors: HJK have collected 1.4 points per match over their last five league fixtures compared with Ilves’ 0.8, while the hosts have lost three of those five games. After the break, HJK average 1.0 goal per match over the season, whereas Ilves concede 0.82, giving the visitors solid grounds to turn a level first stage in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
IlvesHJK
9Shots19
IlvesHJK
4Shots on target4
IlvesHJK
1.14xG2
IlvesHJK
6Corners4
IlvesHJK
40Dangerous attacks72
IlvesHJK
12Fouls8
IlvesHJK
1Cards1
IlvesHJK

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.57Goals scored / match1.62
IlvesHJK
1.67Goals conceded / match1.24
IlvesHJK
50%Average possession54%
IlvesHJK
4.52Shots on target / match4.62
IlvesHJK

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.48Shots per match13
IlvesHJK
4.52Shots on target4.62
IlvesHJK
13.7%Shot conversion12.5%
IlvesHJK
50%Possession54%
IlvesHJK
1.4xG for1.54
IlvesHJK
1.64xG against1.39
IlvesHJK

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingHJK: Balanced
IlvesHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HJK is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Ilves · 1.8 pts / match - HJK

Ilves
WLWLL
Season result split
33% W19% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-10
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
HJK
WLWWL
Season result split
48% W19% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-7
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Ilves · 1.24 goals / match - HJK

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

33Goals scored (season)34
IlvesHJK
35Goals conceded (season)26
IlvesHJK
3.24Average goals in match2.86
IlvesHJK
5Goals scored (last 5)7
IlvesHJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
IlvesHJK

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal76%
IlvesHJK
48%2 goals43%
IlvesHJK
14%3 goals29%
IlvesHJK
5%4 goals10%
IlvesHJK

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal62%
IlvesHJK
52%2 goals38%
IlvesHJK
29%3 goals19%
IlvesHJK
10%4 goals5%
IlvesHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time19%
IlvesHJK
10%BTTS in both halves10%
IlvesHJK
29%Scored in both halves38%
IlvesHJK

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
IlvesHJK
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
IlvesHJK
20%BTTS - last 520%
IlvesHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
IlvesHJK
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
IlvesHJK
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
IlvesHJK

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
IlvesHJK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
IlvesHJK
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
IlvesHJK

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HJK is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Ilves · 1.67 pts / match - HJK

Ilves - half-time state
38% leading29% draw33% trailing
HJK - half-time state
48% leading24% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.67
IlvesHJK
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.76
IlvesHJK
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
IlvesHJK
1.95Average goals (1st half)1.24
IlvesHJK
48%Clean sheet before half-time62%
IlvesHJK
38%No goal before half-time33%
IlvesHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.48
IlvesHJK
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
IlvesHJK
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
IlvesHJK
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.62
IlvesHJK
52%Clean sheet after half-time57%
IlvesHJK
48%No goal after half-time52%
IlvesHJK

Ilves - second-half results

33% W38% D29% L
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HJK - second-half results

38% W33% D29% L
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.60.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
HJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.00
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+6-5
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

HJK
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaHJK
Average goals in match▲ 3.242.63▲ 2.86
Both teams scored▲ 57%50%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 62%48%▲ 57%
Clean sheets• 29%28%▲ 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%76%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 81%75%• 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Bamba Abdoul GoudoussOff: Oliver Pettersson
  2. HJKYellow cardMartin Kirilov
  3. IlvesYellow cardFaris Krkalic
  4. HJKSubstitutionOn: Mouhamed GueyeOff: Alexander Ring

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Ilves 2 - 2 - 1 HJK. Average goals 4.60, both teams scored in 100% matches.

HJK
2 : 2
Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 1
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
2 : 2
Tampereen Ilves
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
5 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 1:2 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and HJK?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ilves won 2, HJK won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs HJK?

Ilves score 1.57 goals per game on average and HJK 1.62. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ilves's matches and 38% of HJK's.

What form are Ilves and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and HJK 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs HJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ilves vs HJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.