Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 23 October 2026

Ilves vs Lahti: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Lahti crest
Lahti

Ilves vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Ilves: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Lahti: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.57 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Lahti scores 1.22 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 57%, Lahti 43%. Over 2.5: Ilves 61%, Lahti 35%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Lahti has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.40. Ilves: 11.6 shots per match, Lahti: 12.7.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.74. Lahti: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (7 goals). Lahti: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clear home advantage: they win 55% of their home matches, score an average of 1.55 goals per game there, and keep a clean sheet in 55% of fixtures. Lahti, however, come into the match in better recent form, picking up 10 points from their last five games compared with Ilves’ 4, while conceding just 3 goals during that period versus 7 for the hosts. The visitors’ main weakness is their away record, scoring only 0.82 goals per match and failing to find the net in 36% of games, whereas Ilves have scored in 91% of their home fixtures. The hosts are also significantly more clinical in front of goal, converting 16% of their shots compared with Lahti’s 7%. Although Lahti’s away xG stands at 1.37, slightly higher than Ilves’ 1.27 at home, the hosts’ superior conversion rate and defensive solidity on their own ground slightly tip the prediction in their favour.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal percentage of matches in which both teams score is low: 45% for Ilves and just 36% for Lahti, compared with 49% across the league. The strongest argument for a BTTS - No scenario is Lahti’s attack, which averages 0.82 goals per match, fails to score in 36% of its games, and converts just 7% of its shots into goals. Ilves concedes an average of only 0.91 goals and keeps a clean sheet in 45% of matches, so the visitors may struggle to turn their recent improved chance-creation metrics into goals. Although Ilves conceded 1.4 goals across its last five matches, with opponents’ xG at 1.92, Lahti conceded only 3 goals during that period. Therefore, the most likely outcome remains a result in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly supports a limited number of goals: matches with a maximum of 3 goals accounted for 82% of Ilves fixtures and as many as 100% of Lahti matches. Lahti score an average of just 0.82 goals away from home, while Ilves concede 0.91 at home, reducing the prospect of a high-scoring game for the visitors. The hosts score an average of 1.55 goals, but Lahti’s defense allows just 0.82 goals on average, keeping Ilves’ projection close to 1.30 goals. Results above 2.5 goals were also rare, occurring in 36% of Ilves matches and 27% of Lahti fixtures, compared with a league average of 46%. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.2 goals scored per game, making Under 3.5 the market best supported by the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves have a clear first-half advantage: they led at the break in 45% of their matches, averaging 1.00 goals scored and conceding just 0.36, while Lahti scored only 0.36 goals before half-time. The visitors failed to score in 64% of first halves and went into the break trailing in 36%, strengthening the scenario of a home lead. Across the season, Ilves average 1.55 goals with a 12% shot-conversion rate, whereas Lahti score just 0.82 goals and lose 45% of their matches. The home advantage is also supported by xG: 1.48 for Ilves compared with Lahti’s 1.37, alongside Ilves’ stronger defence, which allows 1.09 xG, while Lahti’s opponents average 1.42 xG. Lahti’s recent form is good, with 3 wins in their last 5 matches, increasing the chances of a draw or a turnaround; however, the most likely outcome remains Ilves maintaining their lead from half-time to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
IlvesLahti
12Shots19
IlvesLahti
5Shots on target2
IlvesLahti
1.25xG2
IlvesLahti
0Corners6
IlvesLahti
20Dangerous attacks91
IlvesLahti
8Fouls12
IlvesLahti
1Cards2
IlvesLahti

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.57Goals scored / match1.22
IlvesLahti
1.61Goals conceded / match0.87
IlvesLahti
50%Average possession55%
IlvesLahti
4.57Shots on target / match4.09
IlvesLahti

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.57Shots per match12.74
IlvesLahti
4.57Shots on target4.09
IlvesLahti
13.5%Shot conversion9.6%
IlvesLahti
50%Possession55%
IlvesLahti
1.4xG for1.44
IlvesLahti
1.64xG against1.25
IlvesLahti

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingLahti: Balanced
IlvesLahti
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lahti is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Ilves · 2 pts / match - Lahti

Ilves
WLLLW
Season result split
35% W17% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-11
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Lahti
DLWWW
Season result split
43% W22% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-8
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Ilves · 1.22 goals / match - Lahti

Lahti is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Ilves · 0.87 goals / match - Lahti

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Lahti scoring profile: strong

Lahti scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

36Goals scored (season)28
IlvesLahti
37Goals conceded (season)20
IlvesLahti
3.17Average goals in match2.09
IlvesLahti
7Goals scored (last 5)6
IlvesLahti
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
IlvesLahti

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal74%
IlvesLahti
48%2 goals35%
IlvesLahti
13%3 goals4%
IlvesLahti
4%4 goals4%
IlvesLahti

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal61%
IlvesLahti
52%2 goals22%
IlvesLahti
26%3 goals4%
IlvesLahti
9%4 goals0%
IlvesLahti

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time17%
IlvesLahti
9%BTTS in both halves4%
IlvesLahti
26%Scored in both halves26%
IlvesLahti

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
IlvesLahti
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
IlvesLahti
40%BTTS - last 560%
IlvesLahti

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
IlvesLahti
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
IlvesLahti
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
IlvesLahti

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
IlvesLahti
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
IlvesLahti
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
IlvesLahti

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Ilves · 1.57 pts / match - Lahti

Ilves - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing
Lahti - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.57
IlvesLahti
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.7
IlvesLahti
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
IlvesLahti
1.78Average goals (1st half)1.09
IlvesLahti
52%Clean sheet before half-time70%
IlvesLahti
43%No goal before half-time43%
IlvesLahti

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.3
IlvesLahti
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
IlvesLahti
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
IlvesLahti
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1
IlvesLahti
52%Clean sheet after half-time61%
IlvesLahti
43%No goal after half-time57%
IlvesLahti

Ilves - second-half results

35% W35% D30% L
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lahti - second-half results

26% W52% D22% L
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaLahti
Average goals in match▲ 3.172.54▼ 2.09
Both teams scored▲ 57%49%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 61%45%▼ 35%
Clean sheets• 30%29%▲ 39%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%73%▼ 70%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%74%▼ 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardJustus Ojanen
  2. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Otso KoskinenOff: Erik Andersson
  3. LahtiYellow cardYohan Cassubie
  4. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Stanislav BaranovOff: Teemu Hytönen
  5. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Tatu MiettunenOff: Matias Rale
  6. IlvesYellow cardLauri Ala-Myllymäki
  7. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Armend KabashiOff: Aaron Lindholm

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ilves 1 - 0 - 1 Lahti. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs Lahti?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 3:1 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and Lahti?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ilves won 1, Lahti won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs Lahti?

Ilves score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lahti 1.22. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ilves's matches and 43% of Lahti's.

What form are Ilves and Lahti in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Lahti 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs Lahti?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ilves vs Lahti: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.