Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Ilves vs SJK: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
2 : 2half-time 0:0
SJK crest
SJK

Ilves vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Ilves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. SJK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.69 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. SJK scores 1.08 and concedes 1.58. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 62%, SJK 58%. Over 2.5: Ilves 69%, SJK 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.26. Ilves: 9.8 shots per match, SJK: 12.8.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77. SJK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (6 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 3.60, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves is the favorite: at home they have won 67% of matches, have a home goal difference of +5 and average 1.83 goals scored per game. SJK away has only a 17% win rate, a negative goal difference of -5 and averages 1.00 goal per game, with 50% of away matches without scoring. In the last 5 fixtures Ilves scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and averages 1.8 points per match, while SJK has 8 goals (1.6 per game) and only 0.8 points per match. Ilves averages 4.67 shots on target and 9.5 total shots per game with a 19% conversion rate at home, versus SJK’s 4.0 shots on target and 11% conversion away, which provides an edge in quality of chances. xG is similar (1.31 for Ilves vs 1.18 for SJK), but Ilves’ superior efficiency, 67% clean sheets and 0% games without a goal at home shift the odds in favor of the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data indicate BTTS - Yes: Ilves has a season BTTS rate of 67% vs SJK's 50%, while in the last 5 matches SJK recorded 100% BTTS versus Ilves 40%, which strongly signals both teams will score. Ilves generates an average xG of 1.92 with 16.83 shots and 5.5 shots on target per match, whereas SJK concedes an average xG of 1.69 and seasonally concedes 1.83 goals, so Ilves has a realistic chance to score. Conversely, SJK has xG 1.18 vs xG against Ilves 1.09 and in the last 5 matches averaged 1.6 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, so they can also create and convert chances. Both teams have low clean sheet percentages (seasonal CS 17% for each) and in the last 5 matches Ilves conceded 2.2 goals on average and SJK 2.0, which further increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering Ilves’s higher xG 1.92 vs SJK defensive xG 1.69, SJK’s 100% BTTS in the last 5 and the overall offensive/defensive picture, I tip BTTS = Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (90%) because both teams have a season rate of matches over 1.5 at 83% (Ilves 83%, SJK 83%), and the combined expected xG is about 2.94 (1.81 for Ilves vs 1.13 for SJK). Ilves generates 1.92 xG and averages 16.83 shots per game, while SJK has 1.18 xG and 8.83 shots; additionally SJK concedes 1.69 xG, which increases the hosts’ scoring chances. In the last 5 matches both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, Ilves averages 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches and SJK 1.6, which boosts the chance of more than 2 goals in the match (I estimate Over 2.5 at 60%). I consider Over 3.5 unlikely — seasonally Ilves have 17% such matches, SJK 33%, and the expected 2.94 goals is below the 3.5 threshold, hence Under 3.5 at 70%. Based on xG, shot volumes and recent form, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Ilves win at full-time (X/1). SJK drew at half-time in 50% of their matches, increasing the likelihood of an HT draw, while Ilves clearly outcreates them: xG 1.92 versus 1.18 and on average 16.83 shots per match versus SJK’s 8.83. After the break Ilves is considerably stronger — they average 1.33 goals in second halves and earn 1.83 points in second halves, whereas SJK only has 0.67 points in second halves; over the last five matches Ilves accumulated 2.4 points in the second half compared to SJK’s 0.6. Additionally, SJK concedes as many as six goals in the 46–60 minute interval while Ilves concedes only two, which favors a turnaround by the home side after the restart.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
IlvesSJK
9Shots21
IlvesSJK
5Shots on target7
IlvesSJK
1.22xG2.23
IlvesSJK
3Corners7
IlvesSJK
41Dangerous attacks59
IlvesSJK
5Fouls14
IlvesSJK
1Cards3
IlvesSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.69Goals scored / match1.08
IlvesSJK
1.92Goals conceded / match1.58
IlvesSJK
48%Average possession52%
IlvesSJK
4.31Shots on target / match4.75
IlvesSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.85Shots per match12.83
IlvesSJK
4.31Shots on target4.75
IlvesSJK
17.2%Shot conversion8.4%
IlvesSJK
48%Possession52%
IlvesSJK
1.26xG for1.56
IlvesSJK
1.6xG against1.39
IlvesSJK

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingSJK: Balanced
IlvesSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)44%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Ilves · 0.8 pts / match - SJK

Ilves
WLWWL
Season result split
31% W23% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
SJK
LLWLD
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-6
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

1.69 goals / match - Ilves · 1.08 goals / match - SJK

SJK is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.92 goals / match - Ilves · 1.58 goals / match - SJK

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

22Goals scored (season)13
IlvesSJK
25Goals conceded (season)19
IlvesSJK
3.62Average goals in match2.67
IlvesSJK
11Goals scored (last 5)7
IlvesSJK
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
IlvesSJK

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal67%
IlvesSJK
46%2 goals25%
IlvesSJK
15%3 goals17%
IlvesSJK
8%4 goals0%
IlvesSJK

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal83%
IlvesSJK
62%2 goals50%
IlvesSJK
38%3 goals25%
IlvesSJK
15%4 goals0%
IlvesSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time17%
IlvesSJK
15%BTTS in both halves17%
IlvesSJK
38%Scored in both halves25%
IlvesSJK

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
IlvesSJK
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
IlvesSJK
20%BTTS - last 580%
IlvesSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
IlvesSJK
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
IlvesSJK
38%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
IlvesSJK

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
IlvesSJK
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
IlvesSJK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
IlvesSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Ilves · 1 pts / match - SJK

Ilves - half-time state
38% leading23% draw38% trailing
SJK - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1
IlvesSJK
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.42
IlvesSJK
1.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
IlvesSJK
2.15Average goals (1st half)1.17
IlvesSJK
46%Clean sheet before half-time33%
IlvesSJK
31%No goal before half-time58%
IlvesSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)1.25
IlvesSJK
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
IlvesSJK
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
IlvesSJK
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.5
IlvesSJK
46%Clean sheet after half-time42%
IlvesSJK
38%No goal after half-time50%
IlvesSJK

Ilves - second-half results

38% W31% R31% P
18
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
2
7
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
8
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
173%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaSJK
Average goals in match 3.622.63 2.67
Both teams scored 62%53% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%46% 50%
Clean sheets 31%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 92%75% 92%
Goal after half-time 92%78% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  2. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  3. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Stanislav BaranovOff: Joona Veteli
  4. SJKYellow cardSayibu Yakubu
  5. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Otto TiitinenOff: Yiandro Raap
  6. SJKSubstitutionOn: Jaakko MoisioOff: Salim Giabo Yussif
  7. IlvesYellow cardFaris Krkalic
  8. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Roope RiskiOff: Anton Popovitch
  9. SJKYellow cardKasper Paananen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Ilves 0 - 3 - 2 SJK. Average goals 3.60, both teams scored in 100% matches.

SJK
1 : 1
Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
2 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
1 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 2:2 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and SJK?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ilves won 0, SJK won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs SJK?

Ilves score 1.69 goals per game on average and SJK 1.08. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Ilves's matches and 58% of SJK's.

What form are Ilves and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and SJK 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs SJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ilves vs SJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.