Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 03 September 2026

Ilves vs VPS: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
0 : 1half-time 0:1
VPS crest
VPS

Ilves vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ilves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. VPS: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.65 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. VPS scores 1.40 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 60%, VPS 60%. Over 2.5: Ilves 65%, VPS 45%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

VPS has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.40. Ilves: 11.4 shots per match, VPS: 12.3.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.70. VPS: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (7 goals). VPS: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 1.78 goals, and concede just 0.89 goals per game. VPS win 30% of their away matches, score an average of 1.00 goal, and fail to score in 30% of those appearances. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, compared with just 20% of away matches for the visitors, further strengthening the case for an Ilves advantage. Both teams are in poor recent form, with Ilves winning 1 of their last 5 matches and VPS losing 4 of 5, while the visitors have a 6:10 goal difference over that period. VPS generate slightly higher xG away from home, 1.45 compared with Ilves' 1.26 at home, but the hosts are significantly more clinical, converting 19% of their shots into goals versus 9% for their opponents.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 60% of their matches this season, above the league average of 50%, providing a clear argument for a goal from each side. Ilves average 1.8 goals at home, while VPS, despite a lower scoring average of 1.0, generate a solid xG of 1.45, with the hosts conceding 1.30 xG. VPS have seen BTTS in 80% of their last five matches and conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, so Ilves should have good conditions to find the net. The hosts, on the other hand, have been less clinical recently, averaging 1.0 goal, but their defence allowed 2.06 xG per match during this period, strengthening VPS’s chances of scoring. The BTTS - Yes pick is moderately strong, as both teams have also kept clean sheets in only 30% and 20% of their matches, respectively.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by the teams’ season results: at least two goals were scored in 70% of Ilves’ matches and 60% of VPS’ games. Both teams scored in 80% and 70% of their respective matches, while their opponents found the net in 80% and 70% of cases, respectively. VPS conceded an average of 2.0 goals per game in their last five outings, while Ilves allowed opponents an average xG of 2.06, which clearly increases the visitors’ chances of scoring. At the same time, the projected 1.40 goals for Ilves and 1.25 for VPS produces a total of 2.65 goals, making Over 1.5 significantly safer than the more demanding 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves have the clearer first-half profile: they led at the break in 50% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goals and conceding just 0.5, while VPS scored only 0.5 goals before half-time. VPS were level at the break in 50% of their league matches, but in their last five appearances they were trailing at half-time four times, conceding an average of 1.6 goals before the interval during that span. The hosts are also stronger over the full match, averaging 1.8 goals compared with VPS’s 1.0, while their shot conversion rate stands at 13% versus 9% for their opponents. Ilves create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.57 compared with 1.45, while VPS have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches. Ilves’s weaker recent form, with just one win in their last five games, increases the risk of a draw or a turnaround, but the scenario in which the hosts lead at the break and go on to win remains the strongest HT/FT option.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
IlvesVPS
12Shots13
IlvesVPS
3Shots on target6
IlvesVPS
1.41xG1.57
IlvesVPS
9Corners2
IlvesVPS
61Dangerous attacks45
IlvesVPS
7Fouls12
IlvesVPS
2Cards2
IlvesVPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.65Goals scored / match1.4
IlvesVPS
1.7Goals conceded / match1.05
IlvesVPS
50%Average possession49%
IlvesVPS
4.6Shots on target / match4.9
IlvesVPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.45Shots per match12.35
IlvesVPS
4.6Shots on target4.9
IlvesVPS
14.4%Shot conversion11.3%
IlvesVPS
50%Possession49%
IlvesVPS
1.4xG for1.51
IlvesVPS
1.65xG against1.33
IlvesVPS

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingVPS: Balanced
IlvesVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Ilves · 0.6 pts / match - VPS

Ilves
WWLWL
Season result split
35% W20% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
VPS
LLLWL
Season result split
40% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Ilves · 1.4 goals / match - VPS

VPS is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - Ilves · 1.05 goals / match - VPS

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

VPS scoring profile: very strong

VPS scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

33Goals scored (season)28
IlvesVPS
34Goals conceded (season)21
IlvesVPS
3.35Average goals in match2.45
IlvesVPS
8Goals scored (last 5)6
IlvesVPS
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
IlvesVPS

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal75%
IlvesVPS
50%2 goals30%
IlvesVPS
15%3 goals20%
IlvesVPS
5%4 goals10%
IlvesVPS

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal75%
IlvesVPS
55%2 goals20%
IlvesVPS
30%3 goals10%
IlvesVPS
10%4 goals0%
IlvesVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
IlvesVPS
10%BTTS in both halves0%
IlvesVPS
30%Scored in both halves15%
IlvesVPS

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
IlvesVPS
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
IlvesVPS
40%BTTS - last 580%
IlvesVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
IlvesVPS
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
IlvesVPS
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
IlvesVPS

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
IlvesVPS
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
IlvesVPS
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
IlvesVPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Ilves · 1.4 pts / match - VPS

Ilves - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing
VPS - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.4
IlvesVPS
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.75
IlvesVPS
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
IlvesVPS
2Average goals (1st half)1.4
IlvesVPS
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
IlvesVPS
35%No goal before half-time55%
IlvesVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.45
IlvesVPS
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
IlvesVPS
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
IlvesVPS
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.05
IlvesVPS
50%Clean sheet after half-time65%
IlvesVPS
45%No goal after half-time55%
IlvesVPS

Ilves - second-half results

35% W35% R30% P
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

VPS - second-half results

35% W40% R25% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match2.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.60.4
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-6+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

VPS
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaVPS
Average goals in match 3.352.64 2.45
Both teams scored 60%50% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%48% 45%
Clean sheets 30%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 85%77% 75%
Goal after half-time 85%76% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesYellow cardJardell Kanga
  2. IlvesYellow cardOliver Pettersson
  3. VPSYellow cardYassin Daoussi
  4. VPSYellow cardRazak Simpson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ilves 1 - 0 - 2 VPS. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

VPS
3 : 2
Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Vaasan Palloseura
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 0
Tampereen Ilves

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 0:1 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and VPS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ilves won 1, VPS won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs VPS?

Ilves score 1.65 goals per game on average and VPS 1.40. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Ilves's matches and 60% of VPS's.

What form are Ilves and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and VPS 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs VPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.