El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 22 October 2026

INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense: match statistics

INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba
1 : 4half-time 1:3
CD Platense crest
CD Platense

INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

INCA-Aruba played CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

INCA-Aruba: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CD Platense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

INCA-Aruba scores 0.86 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.07 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: INCA-Aruba 57%, CD Platense 64%. Over 2.5: INCA-Aruba 43%, CD Platense 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

CD Platense has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.28. INCA-Aruba: 8.4 shots per match, CD Platense: 7.7.

Match halves

INCA-Aruba: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.64. CD Platense: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

INCA-Aruba: 76-90+ (5 goals). CD Platense: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

INCA-Aruba have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 for CD Platense, which gives the hosts the edge despite the teams having similar records this season. INCA-Aruba win 43% of their home matches, while Platense win only 17% away and lose half of their away games. The hosts average 10 shots per home match, compared with 6.83 for Platense away, and their xG stands at 1.46 versus Platense's 1.29, suggesting they are likely to create more scoring chances. Both teams average 1 goal in these conditions, so the hosts' advantage is not decisive. Platense have yet to keep a clean sheet away from home and concede an average of 1.5 goals, boosting INCA-Aruba's chances of winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 83% of CD Platense’s matches and 50% of INCA-Aruba’s, rising to 60% and 80% respectively across their last five games. The visitors have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.5 goals per match. In their last five outings, they allowed opponents chances worth 2.03 xG per game, which supports the case for a home goal. INCA-Aruba concede 1.25 goals on average, while CD Platense’s xG stands at 1.29, giving the visitors reason to believe they can score as well. Caution is warranted, however: the hosts have failed to score in 38% of their matches, and the visitors have netted only 4 goals in their last five games. Even so, Platense’s frequent goals conceded and both teams’ high BTTS rates in recent matches point towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 87% of INCA-Aruba matches and 83% of CD Platense matches. Although 60% of each team's last 5 matches produced at least 3 goals, season-long results rarely point to 4 or more goals. The hosts score an average of 1.13 goals, while the visitors average 1.00; they also concede 1.25 and 1.50 respectively, supporting a forecast of around 2.60 total goals. However, attacking potential is not negligible—xG stands at 1.49 for the hosts and 1.29 for the visitors—so the 2.5 goals line offers a less pronounced edge than Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: the hosts were level at the break in 5 of their 8 matches and conceded an average of just 0.38 goals before half-time. After the break, the advantage shifts to INCA-Aruba, who have averaged 1.0 second-half goals across their last five matches, while CD Platense scored 0.2 and conceded 1.0 in that period. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors have lost 3 of 5; the average xG also favors INCA-Aruba, at 1.49 compared with their opponents’ 1.29. The X/1 pick therefore combines the hosts’ frequent half-time draws with their stronger recent performances after the break. The risk is the visitors’ stronger starts in their last five matches, in which they led at the break twice, so a scenario in which they lead at half-time before the hosts secure a turnaround remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
10Shots14
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
4Shots on target6
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1.69xG1.92
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
4Corners5
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
106Dangerous attacks84
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
12Fouls6
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0Cards0
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0.86Goals scored / match1.07
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1.64Goals conceded / match1.36
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
44%Average possession49%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
3.86Shots on target / match4.5
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.43Shots per match7.71
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
3.86Shots on target4.5
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
10.2%Shot conversion13.9%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
44%Possession49%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1.28xG for1.39
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1.76xG against1.63
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

Shooting quality

INCA-Aruba: BalancedCD Platense: Efficient finishing
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)46%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

INCA-Aruba is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - INCA-Aruba · 0.8 pts / match - CD Platense

INCA-Aruba
LWDWD
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Platense
LLDLW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - INCA-Aruba · 1.07 goals / match - CD Platense

CD Platense is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - INCA-Aruba · 1.36 goals / match - CD Platense

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: very strong

INCA-Aruba scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: very strong

CD Platense scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

12Goals scored (season)15
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
23Goals conceded (season)19
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
2.5Average goals in match2.43
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
7Goals scored (last 5)4
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
14%2 goals36%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0%3 goals0%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0%4 goals0%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal86%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
43%2 goals36%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
29%3 goals14%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
14%4 goals0%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time29%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0%BTTS in both halves7%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0%Scored in both halves21%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
100%BTTS - last 560%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - INCA-Aruba · 1.36 pts / match - CD Platense

INCA-Aruba - half-time state
14% leading36% draw50% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)1.36
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.64
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.14
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
43%Clean sheet before half-time50%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
86%No goal before half-time43%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.07
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.29
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense
43%No goal after half-time64%
INCA-ArubaCD Platense

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

29% W29% D43% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

21% W43% D36% L
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

INCA-Aruba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
5
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
5
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

INCA-ArubaLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match• 2.502.59▼ 2.43
Both teams scored▲ 57%54%▲ 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%49%▲ 57%
Clean sheets▼ 21%29%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%66%▲ 79%
Goal after half-time▲ 79%74%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Franklin Anderson Martínez Peña⚽ 1
—Jefferson Gerardo Roque Moz⚽ 1
—Johan Carlos Bogotá Valencia⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CD PlatenseGoalJohan Carlos Bogotá Valencia
  2. CD PlatenseGoalFranklin Anderson Martínez Peña
  3. CD PlatenseGoalJefferson Gerardo Roque Moz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: INCA-Aruba 0 - 0 - 1 CD Platense. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished INCA-Aruba 1:4 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense?

INCA-Aruba score 0.86 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.07. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 57% of INCA-Aruba's matches and 64% of CD Platense's.

What form are INCA-Aruba and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games INCA-Aruba have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Platense 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for INCA-Aruba vs CD Platense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.