El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 September 2026

Inter vs FAS: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 2half-time 2:1
FAS crest
FAS

Inter vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter played FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 15 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Inter: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. FAS: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. FAS scores 2.21 and concedes 0.98. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 51%, FAS 53%. Over 2.5: Inter 54%, FAS 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.23. Inter: 7.5 shots per match, FAS: 11.1.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.64. FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.23.

Goals by minute

Inter: 31-45+ (11 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (28 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS is the favorite due to a clear offensive advantage and form: the visitors average 2.09 goals away, have xG 1.52 and 95 goals this season, while Inter at home records 1.15 goals per game, xG 1.21 and 44 goals. In the last 5 matches FAS won 4 times and scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), whereas Inter has only 1 win, scored 4 and conceded 11 (2.2 per game), indicating defensive issues for the hosts. The visitors create more chances – on average 5.1 shots on target and 10.33 shots per away match versus 3.45 and 7.6 for Inter at home – and with a conversion rate of 21% vs 15% they have a higher likelihood of capitalizing on opportunities. Additionally, FAS has a 50% away win rate compared to Inter’s 35% home win rate and averages 2.4 points in the last 5 matches versus Inter’s 1.0 point, therefore I forecast an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rate stands at 52% for Inter and 55% for FAS, with the league average at 54%, indicating a moderate propensity for both teams to score. xG analysis shows Inter’s attacking xG at 1.58 versus FAS’s average xG conceded of 1.34, while FAS’s attacking xG is 1.52 against Inter’s average xG conceded of 1.06; both sides generate more expected goals than the opponent typically allows. In the last 5 matches FAS has scored 13 goals (2.6 per game) and has recent attacking xG of 1.56, whereas Inter has conceded 11 goals (2.2 per game) and has recent xG against of 1.31, which strongly suggests the visitors will create and convert chances. Although Inter score an average of 2.33 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 43% of matches, the seasonal averages (FAS concedes 1.18 goals away) and seasonal BTTS 52%/55% support a both-teams-to-score scenario. Therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes at 65% versus 35% for No, taking into account FAS’s xG and scoring form (13 goals in 5) and Inter’s susceptibility to goals (11 conceded in 5), while noting that the last 5 matches for both teams have a lower BTTS rate of 40%, which reduces confidence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast points to Over 2.5 goals as the best option; expected goals are about 1.46 for Inter (calculated as average xG 1.58 and xG conceded vs FAS 1.34) and 1.29 for FAS (average xG 1.52 and xG conceded vs Inter 1.06), totaling roughly 2.75, which is close to the league average of 2.7. Seasonal metrics confirm a high probability for Over 1.5: Inter has 81% of matches above 1.5, FAS 91% (average ~86%), with only 19% and 9% of matches finishing below 1.5. For the 2.5 line the signal is strongest — Inter has 67% of matches above 2.5, FAS 45%; in the last 5 matches these values rise to 80% (Inter) and 60% (FAS), so I estimate Over 2.5 at about 62%. Additionally, attacking indicators support the Over: average shots 12.33 (Inter) and 10.33 (FAS), shots on target 5.52 and 5.1, and conversion rates 19% and 21%; BTTS occurs in 52% and 55% of matches, which increases the likelihood of more than two goals. I assess Over 3.5 as less certain (around 38%) despite seasonal rates of 48%/36% for Over 3.5, because the expected total of 2.75 is below the 3.5 threshold; therefore the recommended play is Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter led at the break in 12 matches this season (57%), scoring on average 1.14 goals by half-time and conceding 0.29, while FAS led at the break in 7 matches (33%) with averages of 0.81 scored and 0.57 conceded before the break. Over the full match, Inter win 81% of home games, scoring on average 2.33 goals and conceding 0.76, and xG values indicate a moderate advantage for Inter: xG for 1.58 and xG against 1.06 versus FAS xG for 1.52 and xG against 1.34. HT BTTS is rare (seasonal HT BTTS 19% for both sides), and Inter have 76% clean sheets at half-time this season, so the most likely scenario is Inter leading at the break and maintaining the win to full-time — I assign this a 43% probability. On the other hand, Inter’s weaker form in the last 5 matches (only 20% wins) and FAS’s strong run (80% wins in their last 5) increase the plausibility of a draw at half-time followed by a turnaround, so I allocated 21% to X/1 and 11% to X/X as significant alternatives. FAS leading at the break is unusual (the home team trails at half-time in only 5% of cases), so combinations starting with the away team leading remain unlikely (about 5% total).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
InterFAS
4Shots5
InterFAS
4Shots on target4
InterFAS
0.77xG0.91
InterFAS
3Corners5
InterFAS
32Dangerous attacks43
InterFAS
-1Fouls-1
InterFAS
-1Cards-1
InterFAS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.13Goals scored / match2.21
InterFAS
1.41Goals conceded / match0.98
InterFAS
53%Average possession53%
InterFAS
3.54Shots on target / match5.16
InterFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.54Shots per match11.05
InterFAS
3.54Shots on target5.16
InterFAS
15%Shot conversion20%
InterFAS
53%Possession53%
InterFAS
1.23xG for1.55
InterFAS
1.23xG against1.2
InterFAS

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingFAS: Efficient finishing
InterFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)47%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Inter · 2.4 pts / match - FAS

Inter
LLDWD
Season result split
26% W36% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-14-15
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-7-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
FAS
WLWWW
Season result split
65% W21% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
28-9-6
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +53
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-7-4
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 96% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Inter · 2.21 goals / match - FAS

FAS is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - Inter · 0.98 goals / match - FAS

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 37% (16 of 43 matches).

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of matches (38 of 43 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 matches).

44Goals scored (season)95
InterFAS
55Goals conceded (season)42
InterFAS
2.54Average goals in match3.19
InterFAS
4Goals scored (last 5)13
InterFAS
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
InterFAS

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal88%
InterFAS
38%2 goals65%
InterFAS
10%3 goals40%
InterFAS
0%4 goals14%
InterFAS

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal63%
InterFAS
46%2 goals26%
InterFAS
18%3 goals9%
InterFAS
3%4 goals0%
InterFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time19%
InterFAS
5%BTTS in both halves7%
InterFAS
15%Scored in both halves49%
InterFAS

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
InterFAS
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
InterFAS
40%BTTS - last 540%
InterFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
InterFAS
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
InterFAS
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
InterFAS

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
InterFAS
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time51%
InterFAS
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
InterFAS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Inter · 1.72 pts / match - FAS

Inter - half-time state
23% leading51% draw26% trailing
FAS - half-time state
44% leading40% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.72
InterFAS
0.49Goals scored (1st half)0.95
InterFAS
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
InterFAS
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.37
InterFAS
59%Clean sheet before half-time65%
InterFAS
64%No goal before half-time40%
InterFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.86
InterFAS
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.23
InterFAS
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
InterFAS
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.77
InterFAS
44%Clean sheet after half-time58%
InterFAS
56%No goal after half-time26%
InterFAS

Inter - second-half results

31% W28% D41% L
47
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - second-half results

51% W33% D16% L
74
Half-time points
41
Half-time goals
+23
Goal difference (1st half)
80
Second-half points
+30
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.72
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
2
11
16-30
11
8
31-45
11
7
46-60
5
9
61-75
9
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

FAS
ScoredConceded
13
4
0-15
16
3
16-30
13
12
31-45
9
9
46-60
16
4
61-75
28
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (28 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +18 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaFAS
Average goals in match 2.542.71 3.19
Both teams scored 51%54% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%51% 56%
Clean sheets 28%27% 37%
Goal before half-time 59%68% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Emerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino⚽ 2

Away team

Other recorded players

Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1
Yan Dos Santos Maciel⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino
  2. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino
  3. FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
  4. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jaime Alfredo HerreraMatches officiated: 14
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins28%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Inter 0 - 0 - 3 FAS. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAS
3 : 1
Inter
Inter
0 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:2 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and FAS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, FAS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs FAS?

Inter score 1.13 goals per game on average and FAS 2.21. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Inter's matches and 53% of FAS's.

What form are Inter and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAS 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs FAS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.