Inter vs FAS: match statistics
Inter vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Inter played FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 15 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Inter: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. FAS: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. FAS scores 2.21 and concedes 0.98. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Inter 51%, FAS 53%. Over 2.5: Inter 54%, FAS 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
FAS has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.23. Inter: 7.5 shots per match, FAS: 11.1.
Match halves
Inter: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.64. FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Inter: 31-45+ (11 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (28 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAS is the favorite due to a clear offensive advantage and form: the visitors average 2.09 goals away, have xG 1.52 and 95 goals this season, while Inter at home records 1.15 goals per game, xG 1.21 and 44 goals. In the last 5 matches FAS won 4 times and scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), whereas Inter has only 1 win, scored 4 and conceded 11 (2.2 per game), indicating defensive issues for the hosts. The visitors create more chances – on average 5.1 shots on target and 10.33 shots per away match versus 3.45 and 7.6 for Inter at home – and with a conversion rate of 21% vs 15% they have a higher likelihood of capitalizing on opportunities. Additionally, FAS has a 50% away win rate compared to Inter’s 35% home win rate and averages 2.4 points in the last 5 matches versus Inter’s 1.0 point, therefore I forecast an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rate stands at 52% for Inter and 55% for FAS, with the league average at 54%, indicating a moderate propensity for both teams to score. xG analysis shows Inter’s attacking xG at 1.58 versus FAS’s average xG conceded of 1.34, while FAS’s attacking xG is 1.52 against Inter’s average xG conceded of 1.06; both sides generate more expected goals than the opponent typically allows. In the last 5 matches FAS has scored 13 goals (2.6 per game) and has recent attacking xG of 1.56, whereas Inter has conceded 11 goals (2.2 per game) and has recent xG against of 1.31, which strongly suggests the visitors will create and convert chances. Although Inter score an average of 2.33 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 43% of matches, the seasonal averages (FAS concedes 1.18 goals away) and seasonal BTTS 52%/55% support a both-teams-to-score scenario. Therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes at 65% versus 35% for No, taking into account FAS’s xG and scoring form (13 goals in 5) and Inter’s susceptibility to goals (11 conceded in 5), while noting that the last 5 matches for both teams have a lower BTTS rate of 40%, which reduces confidence.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast points to Over 2.5 goals as the best option; expected goals are about 1.46 for Inter (calculated as average xG 1.58 and xG conceded vs FAS 1.34) and 1.29 for FAS (average xG 1.52 and xG conceded vs Inter 1.06), totaling roughly 2.75, which is close to the league average of 2.7. Seasonal metrics confirm a high probability for Over 1.5: Inter has 81% of matches above 1.5, FAS 91% (average ~86%), with only 19% and 9% of matches finishing below 1.5. For the 2.5 line the signal is strongest — Inter has 67% of matches above 2.5, FAS 45%; in the last 5 matches these values rise to 80% (Inter) and 60% (FAS), so I estimate Over 2.5 at about 62%. Additionally, attacking indicators support the Over: average shots 12.33 (Inter) and 10.33 (FAS), shots on target 5.52 and 5.1, and conversion rates 19% and 21%; BTTS occurs in 52% and 55% of matches, which increases the likelihood of more than two goals. I assess Over 3.5 as less certain (around 38%) despite seasonal rates of 48%/36% for Over 3.5, because the expected total of 2.75 is below the 3.5 threshold; therefore the recommended play is Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Inter led at the break in 12 matches this season (57%), scoring on average 1.14 goals by half-time and conceding 0.29, while FAS led at the break in 7 matches (33%) with averages of 0.81 scored and 0.57 conceded before the break. Over the full match, Inter win 81% of home games, scoring on average 2.33 goals and conceding 0.76, and xG values indicate a moderate advantage for Inter: xG for 1.58 and xG against 1.06 versus FAS xG for 1.52 and xG against 1.34. HT BTTS is rare (seasonal HT BTTS 19% for both sides), and Inter have 76% clean sheets at half-time this season, so the most likely scenario is Inter leading at the break and maintaining the win to full-time — I assign this a 43% probability. On the other hand, Inter’s weaker form in the last 5 matches (only 20% wins) and FAS’s strong run (80% wins in their last 5) increase the plausibility of a draw at half-time followed by a turnaround, so I allocated 21% to X/1 and 11% to X/X as significant alternatives. FAS leading at the break is unusual (the home team trails at half-time in only 5% of cases), so combinations starting with the away team leading remain unlikely (about 5% total).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Inter | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAS is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Inter · 2.4 pts / match - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 96% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Inter · 2.21 goals / match - FAS
FAS is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Inter · 0.98 goals / match - FAS
Inter scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 37% (16 of 43 matches).
FAS scores in 88% of matches (38 of 43 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter
Over / Under - FAS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - Inter · 1.72 pts / match - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (28 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +18 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Inter
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Inter | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.54 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 51% | 54% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 27% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino
- InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino
- FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
- FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Inter 0 - 0 - 3 FAS. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:2 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Inter and FAS?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, FAS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs FAS?
Inter score 1.13 goals per game on average and FAS 2.21. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Inter's matches and 53% of FAS's.
What form are Inter and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAS 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs FAS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


