Morocco - Botola ProGrand Stade de TangerData current as of 07 September 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ittihad Tanger played CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 21 June 2026. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Ittihad Tanger: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. CR Khemis Zemamra: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.92 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 1.04 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 56%, CR Khemis Zemamra 52%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 28%, CR Khemis Zemamra 52%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.27. Ittihad Tanger: 10.8 shots per match, CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.3.

Match halves

Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (7 goals). CR Khemis Zemamra: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I pick 1 — Ittihad Tanger win. Ittihad have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points over that period, while CR Khemis Zemamra have 2 wins and only 1.2 points per game in their last five. The home side’s defense is superior at home — conceding 1.00 goal per home match on average and keeping 25% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 1.67 goals away and keep a clean sheet in just 8% of away games. In attack the visitors are slightly more productive: 1.17 goals per away match and away xG 1.33 versus 0.92 goals scored by the hosts and home xG 1.29, and the visitors have a higher conversion rate (10% vs 8% for Ittihad). However, the high draw rate for the hosts (58% of home matches ending level) and the higher average total goals in the visitors’ away matches (2.83) leave some chance of a draw, so I set probabilities at 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics point toward BTTS - Yes: CR Khemis Zemamra has a seasonal BTTS of 58% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while Ittihad Tanger records 46% seasonally and 40% in their last five. Both teams generate similar scoring opportunities — xG is 1.22 for Ittihad and 1.33 for Khemis; Ittihad averages 9.46 shots with 3.0 on target, and Khemis 11.25 shots with 3.5 on target, indicating a realistic chance of goals at both ends. In the last 5 matches both sides scored 7 goals each (1.4 per match), with Ittihad conceding 3 goals (0.6 per match) and Khemis conceding 8 goals (1.6 per match), so Khemis is more vulnerable to conceding. Additionally Ittihad kept a clean sheet in 46% of matches this season, while Khemis only in 8%, yet Khemis’s high Over2.5 rate (67%) and Over2.5+BTTS rate of 57% increase the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering recent form (both 1.4 goals in last 5), Khemis’s higher BTTS (58%/60%) and xG around 1.2–1.3, I assess the probability of BTTS at approximately 57% (Yes) versus 43% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based estimate: Ittihad Tanger has xG_for 1.22 and xG against CR Khemis 1.37, yielding about 1.30 expected goals for the home side; CR Khemis has xG_for 1.33 and xG against Ittihad 1.32, yielding about 1.33 expected goals for the away side, total 2.63. A Poisson model with λ=2.63 translates to ~74% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% for Over 2.5 and ~27% for Over 3.5. Seasonal stats support a moderate outlook: Khemis has 83% of matches over 1.5 and 67% over 2.5, Ittihad respectively 46% and 38%, giving a seasonal average close to 52% for Over 2.5. Last 5 matches form shows Ittihad scored 7 and conceded 3 (avg 1.4 and 0.6), Khemis scored 7 and conceded 8 (1.4 and 1.6), so the home side is more stable defensively, but combined attacking output of both teams maintains an edge for Over 1.5. Based on this I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with expected goals 1.30 vs 1.33 and an estimated probability of 74%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I expect a draw: hosts average 0.31 goals in the first half versus 0.33 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home=0.31, scoredAVGHT_away=0.33), and hosts keep a first-half clean sheet in 62% of matches compared to 33% for away teams (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=62.0, seasonCSPercentageHT_away=33.0). In the second half the situation favors the hosts — in minutes 76–90 the hosts have scored 5 goals versus 3 for the visitors (goals_scored_min_76_to_90_home=5, goals_scored_min_76_to_90_away=3) and in the last 5 matches the hosts won 4 of 5 (last5_winPercentage_overall_home=80.0, form_l5_home='wwlww') while the visitors have a 40% win rate in their last 5 (last5_winPercentage_overall_away=40.0, form_l5_away='lwlwl'). Hosts also collect more points after the break: average points in the second half over the last 5 matches are 2.6 for the hosts versus 1.0 for the visitors (last5_ppg_2hg_overall_home=2.6, last5_ppg_2hg_overall_away=1.0), which increases the hosts’ chance of victory by the 90th minute. Despite similar xG (xg_for_avg_home=1.22 vs xg_for_avg_away=1.33) and comparable season attacking output, the hosts’ form advantage and their defensively solid first half make the most likely scenario a half-time draw and a home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
8Shots11
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Shots on target6
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.93xG1.33
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4Corners4
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
29Dangerous attacks29
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
7Fouls7
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Cards2
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.92Goals scored / match1.04
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.04Goals conceded / match1.28
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
48%Average possession49%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3.16Shots on target / match3.24
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.76Shots per match10.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3.16Shots on target3.24
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
8.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
48%Possession49%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.33xG for1.27
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.46xG against1.35
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedCR Khemis Zemamra: Balanced
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
Accuracy (shots on target)29%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.2 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger
WWLWW
Season result split
28% W44% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-7
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
CR Khemis Zemamra
LWLWL
Season result split
36% W20% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-11
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-7
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.04 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.28 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 matches).

23Goals scored (season)26
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
26Goals conceded (season)32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.96Average goals in match2.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal64%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
24%2 goals32%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%3 goals8%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
20%2 goals36%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4%3 goals16%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 25 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
12%Scored in both halves20%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 0.92 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading48% draw32% trailing
CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
16% leading44% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
56%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
68%No goal before half-time72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.16Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
52%No goal after half-time44%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

32% W40% R28% P
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

32% W40% R28% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
9
31-45
3
1
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaCR Khemis Zemamra
Average goals in match 1.962.15 2.32
Both teams scored 56%51% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%38% 52%
Clean sheets 20%31% 28%
Goal before half-time 64%61% 68%
Goal after half-time 72%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerYellow cardAnass Lamrabat
  2. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Papa Magueye GayeOff: Anass Lamrabat
  3. CR Khemis ZemamraSubstitutionOn: Marouane OujeddouOff: Mohamed Kamal
  4. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Ahmed ChentoufOff: Abdel Hamid Maâli
  5. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardJames Ajako
  6. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardMohamed Radouani
  7. Ittihad TangerGoalHaitam El Bahja
  8. Ittihad TangerYellow cardHaitam El Bahja

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 0 - 0 - 1 CR Khemis Zemamra. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 1:0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.92 goals per game on average and CR Khemis Zemamra 1.04. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 52% of CR Khemis Zemamra's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and CR Khemis Zemamra in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and CR Khemis Zemamra 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The statistical background for Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.