Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ittihad Tanger play Difaâ El Jadida in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Difaâ El Jadida: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Difaâ El Jadida scores 1.00 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 53%, Difaâ El Jadida 57%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 27%, Difaâ El Jadida 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.08. Ittihad Tanger: 10.4 shots per match, Difaâ El Jadida: 8.1.

Match halves

Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. Difaâ El Jadida: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). Difaâ El Jadida: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back an away win for Difaâ El Jadida. Difaâ sit 6th in the table versus Ittihad Tanger in 12th and have a superior season record: 7-7-5 compared to the home side’s 3-10-6. The visitors are more efficient and consistent: shot conversion rate 11% vs 7%, averaging 0.78 goals scored away and 0.78 conceded away, while the hosts average 0.67 scored and 1.00 conceded in home matches. Ittihad holds an edge in possession (51% vs 46%), attempts more shots (9.44 vs 7.11) and posts higher xG (1.15 vs 1.01), but this hasn’t translated into goals (0.67 goals for on xG 1.15), indicating inefficiency in finishing. Considering the visitors’ stronger defense (clean sheets 44% vs 33%), higher recent form (average points in last 5: 1.6 vs 1.2) and superior league position, I rate Difaâ as more likely to win, though a draw remains possible given the hosts’ high share of draws (67% of home matches).

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
23Shots7
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
6Shots on target2
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
2.48xG0.91
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
9Corners6
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
86Dangerous attacks44
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
7Fouls8
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0Cards1
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.9Goals scored / match1
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
1.03Goals conceded / match1.13
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
49%Average possession45%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
3.27Shots on target / match2.9
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match8.1
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
3.27Shots on target2.9
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
8.7%Shot conversion12.3%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
49%Possession45%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
1.3xG for1.08
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
1.48xG against1.46
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedDifaâ El Jadida: Counter-attacking
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Difaâ El Jadida is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.6 pts / match - Difaâ El Jadida

Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Difaâ El Jadida
WWDDL
Season result split
30% W43% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-8
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Difaâ El Jadida is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1 goals / match - Difaâ El Jadida

Ittihad Tanger is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.13 goals / match - Difaâ El Jadida

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Difaâ El Jadida keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Difaâ El Jadida scoring profile: very strong

Difaâ El Jadida scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)30
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
31Goals conceded (season)34
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
1.93Average goals in match2.13
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
23%2 goals27%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0%3 goals0%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal67%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
20%2 goals37%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
3%3 goals7%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0%4 goals3%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
Difaâ El Jadida - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time17%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
10%Scored in both halves13%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
40%BTTS - last 580%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Difaâ El Jadida is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.23 pts / match - Difaâ El Jadida

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Difaâ El Jadida - half-time state
23% leading53% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.23
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.97
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
57%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
70%No goal before half-time60%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
53%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida
53%No goal after half-time53%
Ittihad TangerDifaâ El Jadida

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Difaâ El Jadida - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Difaâ El Jadida - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Difaâ El Jadida
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
4
7
31-45
3
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+97%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Difaâ El Jadida

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaDifaâ El Jadida
Average goals in match 1.932.17 2.13
Both teams scored 53%52% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%38% 47%
Clean sheets 20%30% 33%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 0 - 1 - 0 Difaâ El Jadida. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Difaâ El Jadida
2 : 2
Ittihad Tanger

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 1:1 Difaâ El Jadida. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.90 goals per game on average and Difaâ El Jadida 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 57% of Difaâ El Jadida's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and Difaâ El Jadida in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Difaâ El Jadida 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida?

The statistical background for Ittihad Tanger vs Difaâ El Jadida — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.