Jaro vs Gnistan: match statistics
Jaro vs Gnistan: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jaro played Gnistan in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 23 June 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Jaro: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Gnistan: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jaro scores 0.83 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Gnistan scores 1.55 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jaro 42%, Gnistan 36%. Over 2.5: Jaro 58%, Gnistan 45%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Jaro has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.30. Jaro: 11.6 shots per match, Gnistan: 11.1.
Match halves
Jaro: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.25. Gnistan: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Jaro: 0-15 (3 goals). Gnistan: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gnistan holds a clear form advantage: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals in that span, averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 5, whereas Jaro has only 1 win and 0.6 points per game. Jaro generate more shots and higher xG at home — on average 11.2 shots, 5 on target and xG 1.52 with 1.6 goals per game — but concede 1.8 goals per game at home and have a 6-15 goal record across the last five matches. Visitors on the road average 10.4 shots, 4 on target and xG 1.26, yet they have conceded only 4 goals in their last 5 matches (0.8 per game) and are on a run of 4 wins and 1 loss. The defensive differential is decisive: Jaro have conceded 15 goals in their last five, while Gnistan only 4, indicating an advantage for the visitors despite slightly lower season xG. Given Gnistan’s consistent finishing (12 goals in 5 games) and Jaro’s defensive frailties, I favor an away win, hence the suggested probabilities: 55% Gnistan, 25% Jaro, 20% draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS is Jaro’s defensive form — in the last 5 matches they conceded an average of 3.0 goals (15 conceded), while Gnistan scored 12 goals in those five matches (2.4 per game) and recently has xG_for 1.81. Seasonally Jaro at home scores 2.0 goals on average with 1.67 conceded, and Gnistan has season averages of 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded per game; nevertheless season BTTS rates are relatively low: 33% (Jaro) and 40% (Gnistan) versus the league 51%. Seasonal xG show similar chance-creation: 1.33 xG for Jaro and 1.26 xG for Gnistan with xG against 1.50 and 1.57, suggesting both teams will have opportunities. Additionally Jaro has a higher shot-to-goal conversion rate (17% vs 10%), increasing the likelihood they won’t remain scoreless at home. Considering Jaro’s 15 conceded in the last 5 matches versus Gnistan’s 12 scored, I assign BTTS - Yes 65% and No 35%, therefore I pick the 'Yes' tip.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast indicates total expected goals of 3.30: 1.35 for Jaro and 1.95 for Gnistan. Jaro scores an average of 2.0 goals at home this season and has xG_for 1.33, but in the last 5 matches produced only 6 goals (1.2 avg) and conceded 15 (3.0 avg), indicating defensive issues. Gnistan scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per match) and has a recent xG_for of 1.81; seasonally the visitors score 1.0 goals away, so the away form raises the goal potential. The percentage of matches with over 1.5 goals is 83% for the home side and 80% for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches Jaro and Gnistan had over 2.5 goals in 100% and 60% of matches respectively, which supports a scoring scenario. Therefore I recommend the Over on the 1.5 line as the best selection — a Poisson model with 3.30 expected goals yields about an 84% chance of Over 1.5, and additionally Jaro averages 11.67 shots with a 17% conversion, which increases the likelihood of goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Jaro is clearly stronger at home: they win 67% of home matches and average 2.0 points and 2.0 goals per game, while Gnistan win only 20% of away matches and average 1.0 point and 1.0 goal per game. At Half-Time a draw appears most likely — Jaro were level at the break in 33% of matches, Gnistan in 40%, with average first-half goals of 1.33 for the home side and 0.8 for the visitors. Most decisive action occurs after the break: Jaro average 2.33 second-half goals and have scored 5 goals in the 46–60 minute window, and the percentage of matches with a post-break goal is 100% for both teams, which favors a turnaround after Half-Time. Jaro also have better conversion (17% versus Gnistan’s 10%) and slightly more shots on target (4.5 vs 4.0), so the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win by Full-Time (X/1). Based on this I assign X/1 33%, with significant chances for 1/1 (22%) and X/X (15%), which together imply a 65% probability of a home win in my projection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jaro | Gnistan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gnistan is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Jaro · 2.4 pts / match - Gnistan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gnistan is 87% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Jaro · 1.55 goals / match - Gnistan
Gnistan is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.25 goals / match - Jaro · 1.36 goals / match - Gnistan
Jaro scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).
Gnistan scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jaro
Over / Under - Gnistan
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jaro is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Jaro · 1.18 pts / match - Gnistan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gnistan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jaro
Gnistan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Jaro | Liga | Gnistan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.08 | 2.63 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 52% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 47% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Jaro 1 - 1 - 1 Gnistan. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jaro vs Gnistan?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 1:1 Gnistan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and Gnistan?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 1, Gnistan won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Gnistan?
Jaro score 0.83 goals per game on average and Gnistan 1.55. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Jaro's matches and 36% of Gnistan's.
What form are Jaro and Gnistan in?
Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Gnistan 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Gnistan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


