Finland - VeikkausliigaJakobstads CentralplanData current as of 06 September 2026

Jaro vs Ilves: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Ilves crest
Ilves

Jaro vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro played Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Jaro: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Ilves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 0.93 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.71 and concedes 1.93. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 50%, Ilves 64%. Over 2.5: Jaro 57%, Ilves 71%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.26. Jaro: 11.6 shots per match, Ilves: 9.8.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.29. Ilves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 0-15 (3 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X). Jaro win only 17% of home matches and record as many as 50% draws, while Ilves have no away wins (0% victories) and draw 43% of games, which increases the probability of a shared points outcome. Ilves scored 12 goals in the last 5 matches versus 6 for Jaro, but concede on average 2.71 goals away compared to 1.67 conceded by Jaro at home, so both teams have defensive vulnerabilities. xG points to an even contest: Jaro generate 1.46 xG at home, Ilves have 1.22 xG away, and the hosts average 5 shots on target versus 4 for Ilves, so I expect a tight, goal-filled draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The dominant signal for BTTS is Ilves: a seasonal BTTS rate of 86% and 0% clean sheets away, meaning in 86% of Ilves away matches both teams scored. Jaro at home has a seasonal BTTS of 43% and 57% clean sheets, however in the last 5 matches Jaro shows 80% BTTS and concedes on average 3.2 goals per match, while Ilves in their last 5 matches scores on average 2.4 goals. xG confirms offensive pressure on both sides: recent xG for Ilves is 1.59 versus recent xG conceded by Jaro 1.90, and seasonally xG_for 1.22 (Ilves) and xG_against 1.42 (Jaro). Additionally Ilves has 86% of season matches over 2.5 goals and 71% of matches combining over2.5 with BTTS, against a league average BTTS of 54%, so a Goal/Goal scenario appears significantly more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams show a clear tendency toward goal-heavy matches: Over 1.5 occurred in 71% of Jaro’s games and 100% of Ilves’s games, while Over 0.5 stands at 100% for both sides. Average offensive xG are 1.29 (Jaro) and 1.22 (Ilves), and defensive xG against are 1.42 (Jaro) and 1.87 (Ilves), which when averaged yields a forecast of 1.58 xG for Jaro and 1.32 xG for Ilves, totaling 2.90 expected goals. At this total, the probabilistic model indicates roughly a 79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 55% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), while the probability of 4+ goals is estimated at ~33%. Additionally, Ilves has an 86% BTTS rate versus 43% for Jaro, and in the last 5 matches Ilves scored 12 goals, Jaro 6, with both teams producing Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, reinforcing the expectation of a higher goal count. On this basis I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest and safest signal (over, line 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~79%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I project 1/1 (Jaro leading at the break and winning the match) as the most likely scenario. Jaro led at the break in 43% of matches (3 of 7) and averages 1.0 goals scored and 0.57 conceded in the first half, while Ilves averages 0.71 scored and concedes 1.71 by half-time – this gives the home side a clear first-half advantage. Over full matches Ilves concedes 2.71 goals on average and Jaro scores 1.86 per game; Jaro’s xG is 1.29 versus 1.87 xG allowed by Ilves, and Jaro’s conversion rate of 20% versus Ilves’ 15% increases the home team’s chances of turning chances into goals. Additionally, Jaro has a 57% win rate this season compared to Ilves’ 0% away wins and averages 1.86 points per game versus Ilves’ 0.43, so the lead at the break and full-time victory for the home side is my strongest assessment. Alternatively, a draw at half-time and a later Jaro win (X/1) is possible, since the home side records 29% draws at the break, but I consider that outcome less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
JaroIlves
16Shots32
JaroIlves
9Shots on target12
JaroIlves
1.93xG3.48
JaroIlves
7Corners10
JaroIlves
41Dangerous attacks89
JaroIlves
7Fouls5
JaroIlves
2Cards2
JaroIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.93Goals scored / match1.71
JaroIlves
2.21Goals conceded / match1.93
JaroIlves
47%Average possession48%
JaroIlves
4.29Shots on target / match4.36
JaroIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.57Shots per match9.79
JaroIlves
4.29Shots on target4.36
JaroIlves
8%Shot conversion17.5%
JaroIlves
47%Possession48%
JaroIlves
1.42xG for1.26
JaroIlves
1.52xG against1.65
JaroIlves

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedIlves: Efficient finishing
JaroIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)37%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Jaro · 1.4 pts / match - Ilves

Jaro
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W36% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-8
0.57 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Ilves
LWWLD
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 84% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - Jaro · 1.71 goals / match - Ilves

Ilves is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.21 goals / match - Jaro · 1.93 goals / match - Ilves

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 57% of matches (8 of 14 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

13Goals scored (season)24
JaroIlves
31Goals conceded (season)27
JaroIlves
3.14Average goals in match3.64
JaroIlves
6Goals scored (last 5)11
JaroIlves
16Goals conceded (last 5)11
JaroIlves

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal93%
JaroIlves
29%2 goals50%
JaroIlves
7%3 goals14%
JaroIlves
0%4 goals7%
JaroIlves

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal71%
JaroIlves
57%2 goals64%
JaroIlves
36%3 goals36%
JaroIlves
21%4 goals14%
JaroIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time29%
JaroIlves
7%BTTS in both halves14%
JaroIlves
14%Scored in both halves36%
JaroIlves

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
JaroIlves
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
JaroIlves
80%BTTS - last 540%
JaroIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
JaroIlves
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
JaroIlves
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
JaroIlves

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
JaroIlves
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
JaroIlves
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
JaroIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Jaro · 1.36 pts / match - Ilves

Jaro - half-time state
36% leading21% draw43% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.36
JaroIlves
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.86
JaroIlves
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
JaroIlves
1.57Average goals (1st half)2
JaroIlves
36%Clean sheet before half-time50%
JaroIlves
57%No goal before half-time36%
JaroIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.43
JaroIlves
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
JaroIlves
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
JaroIlves
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.64
JaroIlves
36%Clean sheet after half-time43%
JaroIlves
71%No goal after half-time36%
JaroIlves

Jaro - second-half results

14% W29% R57% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding19%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.41.8
Average goals in match2.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
2
7
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.39
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
128%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
191%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaIlves
Average goals in match 3.142.65 3.64
Both teams scored 50%53% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%46% 71%
Clean sheets 14%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 86%73% 86%
Goal after half-time 79%78% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Teemu HytönenOff: Roope Riski
  2. JaroSubstitutionOn: Adam VidjeskogOff: Jim Myrevik
  3. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Yiandro RaapOff: Kalle Wallius
  4. JaroSubstitutionOn: Joas VikströmOff: Kaius Hardén
  5. IlvesYellow cardYiandro Raap
  6. IlvesYellow cardVille Kumpu
  7. JaroYellow cardHerman Sjögrell
  8. JaroYellow cardAdam Vidjeskog

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Jaro 0 - 0 - 3 Ilves. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Ilves
5 : 0
Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 2:1 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and Ilves?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 0, Ilves won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Ilves?

Jaro score 0.93 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.71. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jaro's matches and 64% of Ilves's.

What form are Jaro and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Ilves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Ilves?

The statistical background for Jaro vs Ilves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.