Jaro vs Inter Turku: match statistics
Jaro vs Inter Turku: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jaro played Inter Turku in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 July 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Jaro: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Inter Turku: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jaro scores 1.00 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Inter Turku scores 1.53 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jaro 53%, Inter Turku 53%. Over 2.5: Jaro 60%, Inter Turku 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Inter Turku has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.46. Jaro: 11.9 shots per match, Inter Turku: 12.9.
Match halves
Jaro: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.27. Inter Turku: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). Inter Turku: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Inter Turku is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table (record 8-6-1) while Jaro are 11th (2-5-8). Offensively Inter averages 2.0 goals on the road and have 23 goals this season, whereas Jaro score 1.57 at home and have 15 goals; additionally Inter has superior finishing efficiency (conversion rate 18% vs Jaro’s 14%), despite average xG of 1.35 for Inter and 1.53 for Jaro, which suggests Jaro create comparable chances but convert them worse. Jaro attempt more shots (11.43) and more on target (5.57) than Inter (10.86 and 4.29), however that volume advantage does not translate into more goals due to the lower conversion. Defensively Inter is better: they concede 1.14 goals on the road vs Jaro’s 1.57 at home, keep clean sheets in 29% of matches vs 14% for the hosts, and in the last 5 fixtures Jaro have conceded 15 goals (3.0 per game) versus 5 conceded by Inter (1.0 per game). Considering Inter’s higher efficiency and better form (Inter 9 goals scored and an average of 2.2 points per game in the last 5, Jaro 7 goals and 0.8 points), I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes 70% vs 30% primarily due to a very strong signal from the last 5 matches: BTTS occurred in 80% of fixtures for both Jaro and Inter. Seasonally Inter scores 2.00 goals per game (23 goals this season), while Jaro scores 1.13 at home (15 goals), with Inter showing a much higher shot conversion rate 18% vs Jaro’s 8%. Although seasonally Jaro conceded only 0.50 goals per home game and kept clean sheets in 50% of matches, in the last 5 games they have been conceding 3.0 goals on average (15 conceded) and record an xG against of 2.26, indicating a weakened defense. Inter in the last 5 matches conceded 1.0 goal per game (5 conceded) and scored 9 goals themselves (1.8 avg), with recent xG-for of 1.33, so they realistically have scoring potential. Additionally both teams create chances: Jaro averages 5.13 shots on target and xG 1.76 at home, Inter 4.29 and xG 1.35, and the league BTTS rate is 52%, which together favors the scenario that both teams will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model gives 1.44 xG for Jaro and 1.06 xG for Inter Turku, totaling 2.50 xG and placing the match exactly on the 2.5 line. Seasonally Jaro has Over 1.5 in 63% of matches and Inter Turku in 100%, and both teams collectively average 25.61 shots and 9.42 shots on target, which increases the probability of at least two goals. For the 2.5 line, season-long Over2.5 is 25% (Jaro) and 43% (Inter), but in the last 5 matches Jaro has Over2.5 in 80% and Inter in 40%, giving a slight edge above 50% for Over2.5. The 3.5 line looks less likely — Jaro has 0% seasonally and Inter 43% — so I assess the chance of over 3.5 at around 25–30%. On this basis the strongest signal is to play Over 1.5, which reflects both Inter’s high seasonal indicators (100% Over1.5) and the combined xG value of 2.50.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Inter Turku has a clear advantage in both the first and second half: they lead at the break in 57% of away matches and on average score 1.0 goals before half-time and 1.71 goals after the break on the road. Jaro at home concedes on average 0.5 goals per game, generates higher xG (1.76 versus Inter’s 1.35) and more shots (14.75 vs 10.86), but their shot conversion is only 8% compared to Inter’s 18%. Inter averages 2.0 goals per game and has a 57% away win rate, which, combined with high second-half productivity, suggests the visitors more often decide matches after the break. Therefore the most likely scenario is Inter leading at half-time and the visitors winning at full-time (2/2). Alternatively, a draw at half-time and an Inter win after the break is possible (X/2), while scenarios with the hosts leading at the break are less likely due to Jaro’s low conversion (8%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jaro | Inter Turku | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Inter Turku is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Jaro · 1.4 pts / match - Inter Turku
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Inter Turku is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Jaro · 1.53 goals / match - Inter Turku
Inter Turku is 166% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.13 goals / match - Jaro · 0.8 goals / match - Inter Turku
Jaro scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Inter Turku keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Inter Turku scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jaro
Over / Under - Inter Turku
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter Turku is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Jaro · 1.6 pts / match - Inter Turku
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Inter Turku - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jaro
Inter Turku
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Jaro | Liga | Inter Turku | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.13 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 27% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Jaro 0 - 0 - 3 Inter Turku. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jaro vs Inter Turku?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 0:0 Inter Turku. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and Inter Turku?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 0, Inter Turku won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Inter Turku?
Jaro score 1.00 goals per game on average and Inter Turku 1.53. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Jaro's matches and 53% of Inter Turku's.
What form are Jaro and Inter Turku in?
Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Inter Turku 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Inter Turku?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


