Finland - VeikkausliigaJakobstads CentralplanData current as of 06 September 2026

Jaro vs SJK: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
2 : 1half-time 1:0
SJK crest
SJK

Jaro vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 24 July 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Jaro: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. SJK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 0.94 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. SJK scores 1.13 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 50%, SJK 56%. Over 2.5: Jaro 56%, SJK 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.42. Jaro: 11.7 shots per match, SJK: 13.3.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.25. SJK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I tip the home win (1). Jaro scores on average 1.38 goals at home with average xG 1.44 per match, while SJK scores 1.00 goals away with xG 1.32; defensively Jaro concedes 1.38 at home and SJK concedes 1.75 on the road. The hosts average 11.13 shots with 5.00 on target per game and have a conversion rate of 12%, whereas the visitors register 10.63 shots with 4.38 on target and a 9% conversion, which translates to higher quality attacking chances for Jaro. SJK fail to score in 50% of away matches, while Jaro are goalless in 25% of home games; additionally Jaro have a 25% win rate and 50% draw rate at home, while SJK win away only 13% and lose 50%, reinforcing the home advantage. Both teams show similar form over the last 5 matches (1W-2D-2L, averaging 1 point per game), but in the last 5 Jaro scored 5 and conceded 10, and SJK scored 6 and conceded 7; based on xG, superior finishing and a lower share of matches without a goal, I favor Jaro to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal metrics favor BTTS: Jaro has a seasonal BTTS rate of 63%, SJK 50%, with the league average at 51% — the combined average of both teams is around 56%, which supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. In the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, with Jaro conceding an average of 2.0 goals in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.4 for SJK, indicating Jaro has been more vulnerable defensively recently. xG confirms Jaro's attacking threat (xG 1.83) against xG conceded to SJK of 1.62, while SJK posts xG 1.32 against xG conceded to Jaro of 1.36 — both sides are creating genuine scoring chances; additionally Jaro averages 5.13 shots on target, SJK 4.38. The low clean sheet rate for both teams (13% seasonally) and the league average of 2.67 goals per match further reinforce the BTTS scenario, therefore I assess the probability of both teams scoring at 70% and pick 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis yields total expected goals of 3.07: Jaro 1.73 (xG 1.83 vs xG conceded to SJK 1.62) and SJK 1.34 (xG 1.32 vs xG conceded to Jaro 1.36). Seasonally, over 1.5 goals occurred in 88% of Jaro’s matches and 75% of SJK’s matches, and total shots 26.51 (15.88+10.63) with shots on target 9.51 (5.13+4.38) confirm the offensive potential of both teams. In the last 5 games Jaro concedes on average 2.0 goals, while SJK scores on average 1.2 goals, which increases the probability of at least 2 goals in the match. The 2.5 line is less clear (seasonal Over2.5 50%/50% and last 5: 60% Jaro / 40% SJK), hence I assess Over 2.5 at ~62%, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (seasonal Over3.5 25% Jaro / 38% SJK). From the above data the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high 88%/75% for the teams and xG 3.07), therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Jaro, at home, led at the break in 3 of 8 matches (38%) and trailed in 5 of 8 (63%), having recorded no draws at halftime (0%); additionally, the hosts conceded 4 goals in the 0–15 minute window, which suggests a higher probability that SJK will be leading after the first 45 minutes. However, Jaro are strong in the second half: they score on average 0.88 goals and concede 0.5 after the break, win 50% of second halves and average 1.88 points after halftime, whereas SJK concedes on average 1.25 goals after the break and lose the second half in 63% of cases. Furthermore, the home side generate higher xG (1.83 vs. 1.32), more total shots (15.88 vs. 10.63) and more shots on target (5.13 vs. 4.38), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. Taking this into account, the strongest signal from the data is SJK leading at half-time and the home side winning at full-time — hence the HT/FT 2/1 selection and assigning this combination the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
JaroSJK
10Shots20
JaroSJK
4Shots on target4
JaroSJK
1.14xG2.09
JaroSJK
1Corners8
JaroSJK
31Dangerous attacks77
JaroSJK
12Fouls10
JaroSJK
4Cards3
JaroSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match1.13
JaroSJK
2Goals conceded / match1.56
JaroSJK
46%Average possession51%
JaroSJK
4.38Shots on target / match4.75
JaroSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match13.25
JaroSJK
4.38Shots on target4.75
JaroSJK
8%Shot conversion8.5%
JaroSJK
46%Possession51%
JaroSJK
1.42xG for1.58
JaroSJK
1.7xG against1.49
JaroSJK

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedSJK: Balanced
JaroSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Jaro
LDLWD
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-8
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 2.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
SJK
DDWLL
Season result split
19% W31% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-8
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJK is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Jaro · 1.13 goals / match - SJK

SJK is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Jaro · 1.56 goals / match - SJK

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

15Goals scored (season)18
JaroSJK
32Goals conceded (season)25
JaroSJK
2.94Average goals in match2.69
JaroSJK
5Goals scored (last 5)6
JaroSJK
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
JaroSJK

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal63%
JaroSJK
31%2 goals31%
JaroSJK
6%3 goals19%
JaroSJK
0%4 goals0%
JaroSJK

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal88%
JaroSJK
50%2 goals50%
JaroSJK
31%3 goals19%
JaroSJK
19%4 goals0%
JaroSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time13%
JaroSJK
6%BTTS in both halves13%
JaroSJK
13%Scored in both halves25%
JaroSJK

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
JaroSJK
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
JaroSJK
60%BTTS - last 560%
JaroSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
JaroSJK
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
JaroSJK
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JaroSJK

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
JaroSJK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
JaroSJK
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
JaroSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Jaro · 1.06 pts / match - SJK

Jaro - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
SJK - half-time state
25% leading31% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.06
JaroSJK
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.38
JaroSJK
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
JaroSJK
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.06
JaroSJK
44%Clean sheet before half-time44%
JaroSJK
56%No goal before half-time63%
JaroSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.25
JaroSJK
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
JaroSJK
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
JaroSJK
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.63
JaroSJK
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
JaroSJK
75%No goal after half-time50%
JaroSJK

Jaro - second-half results

13% W31% R56% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
12
46-60
2
0
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.942.67 2.69
Both teams scored 50%51% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%47% 50%
Clean sheets 19%28% 13%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 81%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardSenne Vits
  2. JaroSubstitutionOn: Aron BjonbäckOff: Jim Myrevik
  3. SJKSubstitutionOn: Aziz CisséOff: Eetu Mömmö
  4. JaroSubstitutionOn: Johan BrunellOff: Kaius Hardén
  5. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  6. JaroYellow cardAdam Vidjeskog
  7. SJKYellow cardRoope Paunio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Jaro 0 - 1 - 2 SJK. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

SJK
1 : 1
Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 4
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
3 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 2:1 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and SJK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 0, SJK won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs SJK?

Jaro score 0.94 goals per game on average and SJK 1.13. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jaro's matches and 56% of SJK's.

What form are Jaro and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and SJK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs SJK?

The statistical background for Jaro vs SJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.