Finland - YkkösliigaJoensuun KeskuskenttäData current as of 17 October 2026

JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
0 : 2half-time 0:1
KTP crest
KTP

JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JIPPO played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

JIPPO: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JIPPO scores 1.38 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. KTP scores 1.71 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JIPPO 43%, KTP 48%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 38%, KTP 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.64. JIPPO: 13.5 shots per match, KTP: 14.9.

Match halves

JIPPO: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86. KTP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.05.

Goals by minute

JIPPO: 76-90+ (11 goals). KTP: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP enter the match as league leaders, with 15 wins from 21 games, while JIPPO sit fourth with 10 victories. The visitors have won all of their last 5 matches, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 3, whereas JIPPO have recorded 3 wins and 2 defeats over the same period. Away from home, KTP win 70% of their matches, lose just 10%, and keep a clean sheet in as many as 70% of their outings. JIPPO have a higher home xG, 1.89 compared with 1.66, and average 58% possession, but score only 1.0 goal per game at home and fail to find the net in 40% of matches. The more clinical KTP, who average 1.4 goals away from home and draw a blank in just 10% of matches, should use their highly consistent form to secure an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

KTP has a very strong defensive profile: it keeps a clean sheet in 70% of matches and has conceded only 3 goals in its last five games, averaging 0.6 per match. JIPPO scored an average of 2.0 goals per game during the season, but its attacking efficiency has dropped to 1.2 goals over its last five appearances, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those matches. The hosts are still creating chances worth 1.64 xG per match, but KTP has restricted opponents to 1.55 xG in its recent run and is in excellent form, with five consecutive victories. The visitors should have their chances, as JIPPO concedes an average of 1.09 goals; however, the key signal is the high probability that KTP’s solid defence will keep the hosts out. Therefore, BTTS No is the more likely outcome, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

KTP have a very solid defense: they concede an average of just 0.90 goals per match this season and keep a clean sheet in 70% of their games. JIPPO score 2.00 goals per home match, but their average has dropped to 1.20 over their last five appearances, while KTP have allowed opponents just 0.60 goals per game during the same period. However, both teams have been creating chances at 1.64-1.68 xG over their last five matches, so at least two goals remains a realistic scenario. The strongest signal, though, supports the Under 3.5 goals line: 73% of JIPPO matches and 80% of KTP matches have finished below it, with a combined projected total of 2.32 goals. Only 27% of the hosts' matches and 20% of the visitors' games have exceeded the 3.5-goal line, clearly supporting the Under 3.5 selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KTP enter this match on the back of five consecutive wins, while JIPPO have lost twice in their last five matches and have averaged only 1.2 goals scored. The strongest signal concerns the first half: JIPPO have failed to score before the break in any of their last five games, whereas KTP held a half-time lead in 60% of those matches, averaging 0.8 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded. The visitors have also been highly consistent defensively throughout the season, conceding an average of 0.9 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 70% of their matches, compared with just 18% for JIPPO. Although the hosts record higher average xG, 1.83 compared with 1.66, KTP’s current form and their 3:0 advantage in the half-time goal balance over the last five matches provide the strongest support for an HT/FT scenario in which the visitors lead at the break and go on to win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

75Possession (%)25
JIPPOKTP
11Shots7
JIPPOKTP
3Shots on target4
JIPPOKTP
1.56xG0.98
JIPPOKTP
8Corners1
JIPPOKTP
90Dangerous attacks36
JIPPOKTP
10Fouls11
JIPPOKTP
0Cards1
JIPPOKTP

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1.71
JIPPOKTP
0.81Goals conceded / match1
JIPPOKTP
53%Average possession49%
JIPPOKTP
4.9Shots on target / match5.33
JIPPOKTP

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.48Shots per match14.95
JIPPOKTP
4.9Shots on target5.33
JIPPOKTP
10.2%Shot conversion11.5%
JIPPOKTP
53%Possession49%
JIPPOKTP
1.64xG for1.75
JIPPOKTP
1.11xG against1.27
JIPPOKTP

Shooting quality

JIPPO: BalancedKTP: Attacking
JIPPOKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - JIPPO · 3 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO
WLLWW
Season result split
48% W33% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-4
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KTP
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W14% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-3-3
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.71 goals / match - KTP

JIPPO is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - JIPPO · 1 goals / match - KTP

JIPPO scoring profile: strong

JIPPO scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

29Goals scored (season)36
JIPPOKTP
17Goals conceded (season)21
JIPPOKTP
2.19Average goals in match2.71
JIPPOKTP
6Goals scored (last 5)8
JIPPOKTP
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
JIPPOKTP

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
JIPPOKTP
43%2 goals52%
JIPPOKTP
24%3 goals19%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals10%
JIPPOKTP

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal57%
JIPPOKTP
14%2 goals19%
JIPPOKTP
10%3 goals14%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals5%
JIPPOKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time29%
JIPPOKTP
5%BTTS in both halves14%
JIPPOKTP
10%Scored in both halves43%
JIPPOKTP

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
JIPPOKTP
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
20%BTTS - last 560%
JIPPOKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
JIPPOKTP
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
JIPPOKTP
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
JIPPOKTP

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
JIPPOKTP
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
JIPPOKTP
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
JIPPOKTP

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - JIPPO · 1.48 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing
KTP - half-time state
33% leading48% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.48
JIPPOKTP
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.67
JIPPOKTP
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
JIPPOKTP
0.9Average goals (1st half)1.19
JIPPOKTP
76%Clean sheet before half-time62%
JIPPOKTP
67%No goal before half-time43%
JIPPOKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.9
JIPPOKTP
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
JIPPOKTP
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
JIPPOKTP
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.52
JIPPOKTP
62%Clean sheet after half-time62%
JIPPOKTP
52%No goal after half-time29%
JIPPOKTP

JIPPO - second-half results

38% W43% D19% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KTP - second-half results

52% W33% D14% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding215%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
8
2
61-75
9
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaKTP
Average goals in match▼ 2.192.53▲ 2.71
Both teams scored• 43%44%▲ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%46%▲ 48%
Clean sheets▲ 43%31%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%63%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%71%▲ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPSubstitutionOn: Gift Okarigbedi SundayOff: Aapo Ruohio
  2. KTPYellow cardAtomu Tanaka
  3. KTPSubstitutionOn: Onni HänninenOff: Petteri Forsell
  4. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Karlos Mahugo BarrenaOff: Niklas Haataja

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): JIPPO 0 - 2 - 0 KTP. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:2 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and KTP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 0, KTP won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?

JIPPO score 1.38 goals per game on average and KTP 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of JIPPO's matches and 48% of KTP's.

What form are JIPPO and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KTP 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.