Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 31 August 2026

JIPPO vs KTP: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

JIPPO vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JIPPO play KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 4 September 2026.

Current form

JIPPO: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JIPPO scores 1.38 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. KTP scores 1.71 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JIPPO 43%, KTP 48%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 38%, KTP 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.64. JIPPO: 13.5 shots per match, KTP: 14.9.

Match halves

JIPPO: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86. KTP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.05.

Goals by minute

JIPPO: 76-90+ (11 goals). KTP: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1.71
JIPPOKTP
0.81Goals conceded / match1
JIPPOKTP
53%Average possession49%
JIPPOKTP
4.9Shots on target / match5.33
JIPPOKTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.48Shots per match14.95
JIPPOKTP
4.9Shots on target5.33
JIPPOKTP
10.2%Shot conversion11.5%
JIPPOKTP
53%Possession49%
JIPPOKTP
1.64xG for1.75
JIPPOKTP
1.11xG against1.27
JIPPOKTP

Shooting quality

JIPPO: BalancedKTP: Attacking
JIPPOKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - JIPPO · 3 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO
WLLWW
Season result split
48% W33% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-4
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KTP
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W14% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-3-3
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.71 goals / match - KTP

JIPPO is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - JIPPO · 1 goals / match - KTP

JIPPO scoring profile: strong

JIPPO scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

29Goals scored (season)36
JIPPOKTP
17Goals conceded (season)21
JIPPOKTP
2.19Average goals in match2.71
JIPPOKTP
6Goals scored (last 5)8
JIPPOKTP
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
JIPPOKTP

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
JIPPOKTP
43%2 goals52%
JIPPOKTP
24%3 goals19%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals10%
JIPPOKTP

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal57%
JIPPOKTP
14%2 goals19%
JIPPOKTP
10%3 goals14%
JIPPOKTP
0%4 goals5%
JIPPOKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time29%
JIPPOKTP
5%BTTS in both halves14%
JIPPOKTP
10%Scored in both halves43%
JIPPOKTP

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
JIPPOKTP
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JIPPOKTP
20%BTTS - last 560%
JIPPOKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
JIPPOKTP
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
JIPPOKTP
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
JIPPOKTP

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
JIPPOKTP
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
JIPPOKTP
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
JIPPOKTP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - JIPPO · 1.48 pts / match - KTP

JIPPO - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing
KTP - half-time state
33% leading48% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.48
JIPPOKTP
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.67
JIPPOKTP
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
JIPPOKTP
0.9Average goals (1st half)1.19
JIPPOKTP
76%Clean sheet before half-time62%
JIPPOKTP
67%No goal before half-time43%
JIPPOKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.9
JIPPOKTP
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
JIPPOKTP
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
JIPPOKTP
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.52
JIPPOKTP
62%Clean sheet after half-time62%
JIPPOKTP
52%No goal after half-time29%
JIPPOKTP

JIPPO - second-half results

38% W43% R19% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KTP - second-half results

52% W33% R14% P
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding215%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
8
2
61-75
9
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaKTP
Average goals in match 2.192.53 2.71
Both teams scored 43%44% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%46% 48%
Clean sheets 43%31% 43%
Goal before half-time 52%63% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%71% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): JIPPO 0 - 2 - 0 KTP. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

When do JIPPO and KTP play?

JIPPO face KTP on 4 September 2026 in Ykkösliiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and KTP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 0, KTP won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs KTP?

JIPPO score 1.38 goals per game on average and KTP 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of JIPPO's matches and 48% of KTP's.

What form are JIPPO and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KTP 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs KTP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.