Finland - YkkösliigaJoensuun KeskuskenttäData current as of 22 July 2026

JIPPO vs MP: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
3 : 1half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

JIPPO vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JIPPO play MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 15 July 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

JIPPO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JIPPO scores 1.47 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. MP scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JIPPO 47%, MP 47%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 40%, MP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.23. JIPPO: 13.6 shots per match, MP: 9.9.

Match halves

JIPPO: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. MP: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

JIPPO: 76-90+ (7 goals). MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

JIPPO has a clear defensive and home advantage: they concede 0.43 goals per home match versus MP’s 1.13 conceded away, and clean sheets occur in 57% of home games compared to 25% for away teams (JIPPO home goal differential +3 vs MP away -3). In attack JIPPO generates 1.84 xG per home match with 5.57 shots on target and 58% possession, while MP produces 1.33 xG, 4.38 shots on target and 49% possession away, indicating higher quality chances created by the hosts. Current form also favors the hosts: JIPPO in the last 5 matches has 2 wins and 3 draws unbeaten, scoring 9 goals and averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas MP has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, 6 goals and only 1.0 point per game. The risk stems from JIPPO’s poor finishing at home — on average 0.86 goals with 1.84 xG and a conversion rate around 6%, plus 43% of matches without scoring, which increases the likelihood of a points share. On this basis I expect a home win, but with a significant probability of a draw: JIPPO 60%, draw 30%, away 10%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
JIPPOMP
18Shots4
JIPPOMP
7Shots on target2
JIPPOMP
2.02xG0.67
JIPPOMP
7Corners3
JIPPOMP
56Dangerous attacks37
JIPPOMP
10Fouls9
JIPPOMP
2Cards0
JIPPOMP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.47Goals scored / match0.93
JIPPOMP
0.73Goals conceded / match1.27
JIPPOMP
54%Average possession48%
JIPPOMP
5.13Shots on target / match3.73
JIPPOMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.6Shots per match9.93
JIPPOMP
5.13Shots on target3.73
JIPPOMP
10.8%Shot conversion9.4%
JIPPOMP
54%Possession48%
JIPPOMP
1.67xG for1.23
JIPPOMP
1.08xG against1.5
JIPPOMP

Shooting quality

JIPPO: BalancedMP: Balanced
JIPPOMP
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JIPPO is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - JIPPO · 1 pts / match - MP

JIPPO
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W40% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
MP
DLWDL
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 58% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - JIPPO · 0.93 goals / match - MP

JIPPO is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.27 goals / match - MP

JIPPO scoring profile: very strong

JIPPO scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

MP scoring profile: strong

MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

22Goals scored (season)14
JIPPOMP
11Goals conceded (season)19
JIPPOMP
2.2Average goals in match2.2
JIPPOMP
12Goals scored (last 5)7
JIPPOMP
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
JIPPOMP

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
JIPPOMP
47%2 goals20%
JIPPOMP
27%3 goals0%
JIPPOMP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOMP

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal73%
JIPPOMP
13%2 goals33%
JIPPOMP
7%3 goals20%
JIPPOMP
0%4 goals0%
JIPPOMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
JIPPOMP
7%BTTS in both halves0%
JIPPOMP
13%Scored in both halves7%
JIPPOMP

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
JIPPOMP
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
JIPPOMP
60%BTTS - last 5100%
JIPPOMP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
JIPPOMP
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
JIPPOMP
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
JIPPOMP

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
JIPPOMP
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
JIPPOMP
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
JIPPOMP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JIPPO - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing
MP - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.47
JIPPOMP
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.4
JIPPOMP
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
JIPPOMP
1Average goals (1st half)0.67
JIPPOMP
73%Clean sheet before half-time73%
JIPPOMP
60%No goal before half-time60%
JIPPOMP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)0.87
JIPPOMP
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
JIPPOMP
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
JIPPOMP
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.53
JIPPOMP
67%Clean sheet after half-time40%
JIPPOMP
53%No goal after half-time60%
JIPPOMP

JIPPO - second-half results

33% W53% R13% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - second-half results

13% W47% R40% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+82%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaMP
Average goals in match 2.202.47 2.20
Both teams scored 47%44% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%44% 40%
Clean sheets 47%31% 27%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 60%73% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: JIPPO 1 - 0 - 0 MP. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 3:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs MP?

JIPPO score 1.47 goals per game on average and MP 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of JIPPO's matches and 47% of MP's.

What form are JIPPO and MP in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and MP 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs MP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.