Finland - YkkösliigaJoensuun KeskuskenttäData current as of 10 November 2026

JIPPO vs PK-35: match statistics

JIPPO crest
JIPPO
0 : 0half-time 0:0
PK-35 crest
PK-35

JIPPO vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

JIPPO played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 26 September 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

JIPPO: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. PK-35: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

JIPPO scores 1.33 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.71 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: JIPPO 42%, PK-35 38%. Over 2.5: JIPPO 38%, PK-35 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.44. JIPPO: 13.4 shots per match, PK-35: 11.6.

Match halves

JIPPO: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88. PK-35: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

JIPPO: 76-90+ (12 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 sit 2nd, while JIPPO are fourth, and over the course of the season the visitors have won 14 of 24 matches, suffering just 4 defeats. The strongest argument in favor of PK-35 is their away form: they win 82% of their matches on the road, score an average of 2.00 goals and concede just 0.18 per game, while keeping a clean sheet in 82% of their away appearances. At home, JIPPO control possession for an average of 59% of the match and create chances worth 1.87 xG, yet score only 1.08 goals, failing to find the net in 42% of their home games. The visitors are more clinical in front of goal, converting 17% of their shots compared with JIPPO’s 7%, while their recent form is also marginally better: 10 points from five matches compared with 9 for the hosts. JIPPO have conceded just 5 goals in their last five fixtures, so this could be a closely contested match; however, PK-35’s exceptionally solid away defense supports a victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from PK-35, who have kept a clean sheet in 82% of their matches, with both teams scoring in only 9% of games. The visitors concede an average of just 0.18 goals per match, while JIPPO fail to score in 31% of their appearances, meaning the hosts may struggle to break through the opposition’s defense. In their last five matches, PK-35 allowed opponents an average of 0.8 goals, and BTTS occurred in only 20% of games, reinforcing this angle. JIPPO do have a season BTTS rate of 62% and average xG of 1.43, but PK-35 combine an effective attack, averaging 2.0 goals, with a very high number of clean sheets. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is clearly more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

PK-35 combines a very strong away attack, averaging 2.00 goals, with an exceptionally tight defense that concedes only 0.18 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 82% of games. This clearly limits JIPPO’s attacking potential, as they average 1.46 goals at home but fail to score in 31% of matches. Across the season, PK-35’s games have finished Under 3.5 goals in 82% of cases, while the figure for JIPPO is also a high 69%. The teams’ last five matches produced an average of 2.7 goals in total, although PK-35 conceded just 0.8 goals per game during this period. The projected total of 2.30 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals, as a result requiring at least four goals would need to break through the visitors’ very solid defense.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 have a clear advantage across the season: they win 82% of their matches and average 2.00 goals, while JIPPO win 38% of their games with an average of 1.46 goals. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the visitors have held a lead at the break in 55% of their matches—and in as many as 60% of their last five—whereas JIPPO have failed to take the lead even once in this period and have not scored before half-time. PK-35 concede just 0.18 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 82% of their appearances, which significantly limits the hosts’ prospects of a turnaround. The visitors have also remained unbeaten in the second half throughout the season, winning 55% of second halves and keeping a clean sheet in every match during that period. JIPPO have a better recent record after the interval, averaging 1.60 goals, but PK-35’s first-half advantage and exceptionally solid defence make the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and securing the full-time win the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
JIPPOPK-35
9Shots8
JIPPOPK-35
3Shots on target2
JIPPOPK-35
1.21xG0.95
JIPPOPK-35
5Corners4
JIPPOPK-35
60Dangerous attacks42
JIPPOPK-35
9Fouls13
JIPPOPK-35
1Cards1
JIPPOPK-35

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.71
JIPPOPK-35
0.88Goals conceded / match0.75
JIPPOPK-35
55%Average possession43%
JIPPOPK-35
4.96Shots on target / match4.08
JIPPOPK-35

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match11.63
JIPPOPK-35
4.96Shots on target4.08
JIPPOPK-35
10%Shot conversion14.7%
JIPPOPK-35
55%Possession43%
JIPPOPK-35
1.64xG for1.44
JIPPOPK-35
1.08xG against1.37
JIPPOPK-35

Shooting quality

JIPPO: BalancedPK-35: Counter-attacking
JIPPOPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - JIPPO · 2 pts / match - PK-35

JIPPO
WWLWL
Season result split
46% W29% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
PK-35
WWDWL
Season result split
58% W25% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-6-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-1-1
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - JIPPO · 1.71 goals / match - PK-35

PK-35 is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - JIPPO · 0.75 goals / match - PK-35

JIPPO scoring profile: mixed

JIPPO scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).

PK-35 scoring profile: strong

PK-35 scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 matches).

32Goals scored (season)41
JIPPOPK-35
21Goals conceded (season)18
JIPPOPK-35
2.21Average goals in match2.46
JIPPOPK-35
8Goals scored (last 5)10
JIPPOPK-35
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
JIPPOPK-35

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
JIPPOPK-35
42%2 goals42%
JIPPOPK-35
25%3 goals38%
JIPPOPK-35
0%4 goals13%
JIPPOPK-35

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal50%
JIPPOPK-35
17%2 goals13%
JIPPOPK-35
8%3 goals8%
JIPPOPK-35
0%4 goals4%
JIPPOPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time13%
JIPPOPK-35
4%BTTS in both halves4%
JIPPOPK-35
8%Scored in both halves29%
JIPPOPK-35

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
JIPPOPK-35
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
JIPPOPK-35
40%BTTS - last 520%
JIPPOPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
JIPPOPK-35
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
JIPPOPK-35
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
JIPPOPK-35

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
JIPPOPK-35
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
JIPPOPK-35
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
JIPPOPK-35

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - JIPPO · 1.58 pts / match - PK-35

JIPPO - half-time state
25% leading46% draw29% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
38% leading46% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.58
JIPPOPK-35
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.75
JIPPOPK-35
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
JIPPOPK-35
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.08
JIPPOPK-35
67%Clean sheet before half-time71%
JIPPOPK-35
71%No goal before half-time58%
JIPPOPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per match (2nd half)1.79
JIPPOPK-35
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
JIPPOPK-35
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
JIPPOPK-35
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.38
JIPPOPK-35
63%Clean sheet after half-time67%
JIPPOPK-35
54%No goal after half-time38%
JIPPOPK-35

JIPPO - second-half results

38% W42% D21% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding184%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PK-35 - second-half results

46% W42% D13% L
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
11
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JIPPOLigaPK-35
Average goals in match▼ 2.212.59▼ 2.46
Both teams scored▼ 42%46%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%46%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 38%30%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 58%67%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%74%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JIPPOYellow cardPasi Forsman
  2. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Terrence SmithOff: Aleksi Tarvonen
  3. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Olavi KeturiOff: Eemeli Honkola
  4. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Ngabo NdaziramiyeOff: Eino-Iivari Pitkälä

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): JIPPO 1 - 3 - 1 PK-35. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

PK-35
1 : 1
JIPPO
JIPPO
0 : 1
PK-35
Pallokerho-35 ry
0 : 2
JIPPO Joensuu
Pallokerho-35 ry
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu
JIPPO Joensuu
1 : 1
Pallokerho-35 ry

FAQ

What was the result of JIPPO vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 0:0 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JIPPO and PK-35?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches JIPPO won 1, PK-35 won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs PK-35?

JIPPO score 1.33 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 42% of JIPPO's matches and 38% of PK-35's.

What form are JIPPO and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and PK-35 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs PK-35?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.