Juventud vs Wanderers: match statistics
Juventud vs Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Juventud played Wanderers in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Venue: Estadio Municipal Parque Artigas. Final score: 2:5.
Current form
Juventud: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Wanderers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Juventud scores 1.19 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Wanderers scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Juventud 63%, Wanderers 53%. Over 2.5: Juventud 56%, Wanderers 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Juventud has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.40. Juventud: 11.8 shots per match, Wanderers: 10.9.
Match halves
Juventud: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.50. Wanderers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Juventud: 31-45+ (7 goals). Wanderers: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Juventud win (1) based on a clear advantage in home match metrics: the hosts average 1.11 goals per home game with xG 1.66, while Wanderers average 0.88 goals away with xG 1.45. In the last 5 matches Juventud scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) and averages 1.8 points per match, whereas Wanderers scored only 4 goals in their last 5 (0.8 per match) and average 1.6 points per match. The hosts’ defense appears more solid – Juventud concedes 0.89 goals on average at home, while Wanderers concede 1.63 goals away, and average xG against of 1.21 vs 1.5, indicating greater defensive stability for the home side. In chance creation Juventud holds the edge: on average 5.89 shots on target and 12.33 total shots at home versus 3.38 shots on target and 11.63 total shots for the away side, with conversion rates of 9% vs 8%. Considering higher possession 54% vs 50%, a better home win rate 44% vs Wanderers’ 25% away win rate, and the hosts’ unbeaten form in their last 5 matches, I assess the chances as: Juventud win 60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes — key signals are Wanderers’ season BTTS rate of 63% and Juventud’s very high BTTS in the last 5 matches at 80%. Both teams generate comparable xG: Juventud xG 1.36 vs Wanderers 1.45, while xG against are 1.43 and 1.50; this indicates each team typically creates ~1.3–1.5 xG and has realistic chances of scoring. Season goal averages show Juventud scores 1.11 and concedes 1.00, while Wanderers score 0.88 and concede 1.63; additionally Juventud has higher shot conversion (11% vs 8%), increasing their likelihood of converting chances. A counterpoint is Wanderers’ recent form: BTTS only 40% in the last 5 and an average of 0.6 conceded, suggesting a short-term defensive improvement; nonetheless season-long and xG signals favor both teams finding the net. Given the league average BTTS of 52% and the above data, I estimate BTTS probability at 65% for Yes and 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives 1.43 expected goals for Juventud and 1.44 for Wanderers, totaling 2.87 expected goals and making the 2.5 line a natural reference point. Season-long stats confirm goal propensity: Over 1.5 occurred in 67% of Juventud matches and 75% of Wanderers matches, while Over 0.5 is 89%/88% for the two sides. Converting shots to goals yields 10.33×11% ≈1.14 goals for Juventud and 11.63×8% ≈0.93 for Wanderers (sum ≈2.07), but the higher xG indicates chances created were of quality and could produce more finishes. Signals for the 2.5 line are mixed: Over 2.5 appears for Juventud in 44% of cases and for Wanderers in 63% (average ~54%), however Juventud’s last 5 matches feature 8 goals (1.6 avg) and last5 xG 1.57, so I assign roughly a 65% probability to Over 2.5. The 3.5 line looks unprofitable on the over — season Over 3.5 rates are only 11%/13% (avg 12%) and expected 2.87 is well below 3.5, therefore Under 3.5 holds the edge (~82%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the home side led in 33% of matches, while a draw occurs in 56% of their games, making a draw the most common half-time score. Nevertheless, the home team wins 44% of matches (away side 25%), and the home side scores an average of 0.67 goals by half-time versus 0.38 for the visitors, giving them an advantage in the decisive phase of the match. The away team concedes an average of 1.63 goals per game and 1.0 goal in the second half, while the home side records more shots on target (4.33 vs 3.38) and a better conversion rate (11% vs 8%), factors that favor a turnaround from a half-time draw in their favor. Additionally, the home team scored 5 goals in minutes 31–45 compared to 1 for their opponents, demonstrating the ability to score just before and immediately after half-time. On this basis the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), which I assign a 26% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Juventud | Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Juventud is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Juventud · 1.6 pts / match - Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Juventud is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Juventud · 1 goals / match - Wanderers
Wanderers is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Juventud · 1.29 goals / match - Wanderers
Juventud scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).
Wanderers scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Juventud keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Juventud
Over / Under - Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Juventud is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Juventud · 1.29 pts / match - Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Juventud - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 31%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Juventud
Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Juventud | Liga | Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.56 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 53% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 27% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 71% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Juventud 3 - 0 - 0 Wanderers. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Juventud vs Wanderers?
The Primera División match finished Juventud 2:5 Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Juventud and Wanderers?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Juventud won 3, Wanderers won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Juventud vs Wanderers?
Juventud score 1.19 goals per game on average and Wanderers 1.00. The Primera División average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Juventud's matches and 53% of Wanderers's.
What form are Juventud and Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Juventud have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Wanderers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Juventud vs Wanderers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


