Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildAkureyrarvöllurData current as of 06 September 2026

KA vs ÍA: match statistics

KA crest
KA
3 : 2half-time 0:1
ÍA crest
ÍA

KA vs ÍA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KA played ÍA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 12 July 2026. Venue: Akureyrarvöllur. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

KA: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. ÍA: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KA scores 1.46 and concedes 2.15 goals per match. ÍA scores 1.31 and concedes 1.92. League average: 4.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KA 69%, ÍA 62%. Over 2.5: KA 62%, ÍA 62%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

ÍA has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.64. KA: 14.4 shots per match, ÍA: 14.2.

Match halves

KA: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92. ÍA: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

KA: 76-90+ (6 goals). ÍA: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.00 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2) because KA is in severe decline — 0 points in the last five matches and 5 straight losses, conceding 18 goals in that span (3.6 per game). At home KA averages 1.33 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game, with only a 17% win rate and 83% loss rate at home, which clearly undermines their chances. ÍA displays superior offensive metrics on the road: 5.29 shots on target and 1.57 goals per game with 11% conversion versus KA’s 4.33 shots on target and 1.33 goals, and higher xG per game 1.68 vs 1.54. The visitors also have a better recent five-match defensive record: 1 win and an average of 0.6 points per game and 11 goals conceded (2.2 per game), which compared to KA’s 18 conceded in the same period gives them a defensive edge. Considering these figures and ÍA’s higher away efficiency, the most likely outcome is an away victory, with a moderate chance of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

League and team indicators strongly point to BTTS: KA has a seasonal BTTS 67%, ÍA 57%, and league-wide BTTS occurs in 74% of matches. In the last 5 games KA had BTTS 100%, scoring 10 and conceding 18 (avg 2.0 scored and 3.6 conceded), while ÍA in their last 5 scored 6 and conceded 11 (1.2 and 2.2). xG confirms open games: KA generates 1.64 xG and concedes 1.44 xG, ÍA generates 1.68 xG and concedes 1.86 xG, so both teams create and allow about 1.4–1.9 xG per match. Clean sheets are rare (KA 17%, ÍA 14%), seasonal tallies are 19 scored/28 conceded for KA and 17/25 for ÍA, and Over 2.5 is 50% for KA and 71% for ÍA, therefore I back BTTS - Yes with a probability of 80% versus 20% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model combines each side’s attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: KA has ~1.75 expected goals (attacking xG 1.64 vs opponent xG conceded 1.86), and ÍA ~1.56 (attacking xG 1.68 vs KA defence 1.44), yielding ~3.31 total expected goals. Season metrics indicate strong goal potential — KA has 83% of matches over 1.5 goals, ÍA 71%, and the league averages 4.0 goals per game with 71% of fixtures over 2.5. In the last 5 matches KA scored 10 and conceded 18 (avg 2.0 scored, 3.6 conceded), while ÍA scored 6 and conceded 11 (1.2 and 2.2), confirming a tendency toward high-scoring affairs. Additionally BTTS occurs in 67% of KA games and 57% of ÍA games (league 74%), and Over 2.5 appears in 71% of ÍA games and 50% of KA games, so the strongest signal is for Over. I recommend Over 1.5 as the optimal line (estimated probability ~88%), with a strong indication for Over 2.5 (~69%) based on the combined xG of 3.31 and high BTTS rates.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I anticipate a draw — the away side were level at the break in 57% of matches (4 of 7), while the home team led at half-time in 50% of games (3 of 6), indicating an even first half. In the second half the away team are the favourites: they score on average 1.14 goals after the break, the hosts concede on average 1.17 goals after the break, with average second-half goals of 2.71 in the away team’s matches versus 1.67 in the hosts’ matches. The away team are also more efficient — a shot conversion rate of 11% compared to 7% for the hosts, with a similar xG of 1.68 (away) vs 1.64 (home), suggesting an advantage in finishing chances. The hosts are in poor form (5 defeats in their last 5 matches), while the away team have 1 win and 4 defeats in their last 5 (LWLLL), so the strongest signal points to a draw at half-time and a turnaround with the away team winning by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
KAÍA
19Shots22
KAÍA
11Shots on target7
KAÍA
2.25xG2.14
KAÍA
4Corners6
KAÍA
41Dangerous attacks38
KAÍA
18Fouls11
KAÍA
2Cards1
KAÍA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.46Goals scored / match1.31
KAÍA
2.15Goals conceded / match1.92
KAÍA
45%Average possession51%
KAÍA
4.62Shots on target / match4.85
KAÍA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.38Shots per match14.15
KAÍA
4.62Shots on target4.85
KAÍA
10.2%Shot conversion9.2%
KAÍA
45%Possession51%
KAÍA
1.64xG for1.66
KAÍA
1.99xG against1.67
KAÍA

Shooting quality

KA: AttackingÍA: Attacking
KAÍA
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KA
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W8% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-9
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 2.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
ÍA
WWLLL
Season result split
31% W23% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KA is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - KA · 1.31 goals / match - ÍA

ÍA is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.15 goals / match - KA · 1.92 goals / match - ÍA

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while ÍA keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

ÍA scoring profile: very strong

ÍA scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

19Goals scored (season)17
KAÍA
28Goals conceded (season)25
KAÍA
3.62Average goals in match3.23
KAÍA
10Goals scored (last 5)6
KAÍA
18Goals conceded (last 5)9
KAÍA

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal77%
KAÍA
46%2 goals38%
KAÍA
15%3 goals15%
KAÍA
0%4 goals0%
KAÍA

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
KAÍA
62%2 goals54%
KAÍA
46%3 goals31%
KAÍA
15%4 goals15%
KAÍA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time8%
KAÍA
15%BTTS in both halves8%
KAÍA
23%Scored in both halves15%
KAÍA

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
KAÍA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
KAÍA
100%BTTS - last 540%
KAÍA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
KAÍA
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
KAÍA
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
KAÍA

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
KAÍA
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
KAÍA
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
KAÍA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍA is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.77 pts / match - KA · 1.31 pts / match - ÍA

KA - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing
ÍA - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per match (1st half)1.31
KAÍA
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.46
KAÍA
1.15Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
KAÍA
1.69Average goals (1st half)1
KAÍA
31%Clean sheet before half-time62%
KAÍA
62%No goal before half-time62%
KAÍA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)0.92
KAÍA
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
KAÍA
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.38
KAÍA
1.92Average goals (2nd half)2.23
KAÍA
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
KAÍA
31%No goal after half-time46%
KAÍA

KA - second-half results

38% W31% R31% P
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ÍA - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.81.8
Average goals in match2.63.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%100%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
ÍA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KA
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
7
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

ÍA
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

ÍA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KALigaÍA
Average goals in match 3.624.00 3.23
Both teams scored 69%74% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%71% 62%
Clean sheets 15%14% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%84% 69%
Goal after half-time 92%88% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.00
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.09
Home goals / match
1.91
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KA 2 - 1 - 1 ÍA. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

ÍA
1 : 1
KA
KA Akureyri
5 : 1
ÍA Akranes
KA Akureyri
2 : 0
ÍA Akranes
ÍA Akranes
3 : 0
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of KA vs ÍA?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KA 3:2 ÍA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KA and ÍA?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KA won 2, ÍA won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KA vs ÍA?

KA score 1.46 goals per game on average and ÍA 1.31. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 69% of KA's matches and 62% of ÍA's.

What form are KA and ÍA in?

Over the last 5 games KA have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and ÍA 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KA vs ÍA?

The statistical background for KA vs ÍA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.