Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
130%(3.03)
X28%(3.45)
242%(2.17)

Patro Eisden presents decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors have an impressive 42% win rate away and a positive goal difference (+5), while KAA Gent II wins only 25% of cases in home matches with a -6 balance. A key factor is Patro Eisden's advantage in average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) and higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match versus 1.08 for the hosts). Form over the last five matches also argues for the visitors (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, further weakening their position. All indicators point to an advantage for Patro Eisden, though the poor efficiency of both teams in keeping clean sheets suggests an exciting match.

KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent II play Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Patro Eisden: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 53%, Patro Eisden 53%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 56%, Patro Eisden 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.50. KAA Gent II: 12.5 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 14.8.

Match halves

KAA Gent II: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.72. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 61-75 (12 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Patro Eisden presents decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors have an impressive 42% win rate away and a positive goal difference (+5), while KAA Gent II wins only 25% of cases in home matches with a -6 balance. A key factor is Patro Eisden's advantage in average xG (1.79 vs 1.54) and higher scoring efficiency (1.5 goals per away match versus 1.08 for the hosts). Form over the last five matches also argues for the visitors (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, further weakening their position. All indicators point to an advantage for Patro Eisden, though the poor efficiency of both teams in keeping clean sheets suggests an exciting match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
10Shots9
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
7Shots on target1
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.55xG0.91
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2Corners4
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
57Dangerous attacks36
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
15Fouls20
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2Cards3
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.31Goals scored / match1.38
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.59Goals conceded / match1.29
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
58%Average possession37%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target / match5.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.47Shots per match14.82
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target5.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
10.5%Shot conversion9.3%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
58%Possession37%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.5xG for1.65
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.63xG against1.16
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent II
LWLLD
Season result split
38% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-15
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Patro Eisden
LLWDL
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

KAA Gent II scoring profile: strong

KAA Gent II scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)47
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
51Goals conceded (season)44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
2.91Average goals in match2.68
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
5Goals scored (last 5)7
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal71%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
44%2 goals41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
16%3 goals15%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
6%4 goals12%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal71%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
47%2 goals38%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
22%3 goals12%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
9%4 goals9%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time15%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0%BTTS in both halves6%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
28%Scored in both halves21%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 540%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.44 pts / match - Patro Eisden

KAA Gent II - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading38% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.56
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.25Average goals (1st half)1
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
59%No goal before half-time59%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per match (2nd half)1.24
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.68
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
44%Clean sheet after half-time41%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden
47%No goal after half-time50%
KAA Gent IIPatro Eisden

KAA Gent II - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
49
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
12
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.912.84 2.68
Both teams scored 53%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 47%
Clean sheets 19%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 66%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KAA Gent II 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 2:1 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

KAA Gent II score 1.31 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of KAA Gent II's matches and 53% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are KAA Gent II and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs Patro Eisden?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.