Belgium - First Division BPlanet Group ArenaData current as of 15 October 2026

KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
3 : 2half-time 1:2
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KAA Gent II played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Planet Group Arena. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

KAA Gent II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. RFC Seraing: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KAA Gent II scores 1.20 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KAA Gent II 40%, RFC Seraing 67%. Over 2.5: KAA Gent II 60%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

RFC Seraing has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.08. KAA Gent II: 9.2 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 10.7.

Match halves

KAA Gent II: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

KAA Gent II: 0-15 (3 goals). RFC Seraing: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KAA Gent II are the favourites, although their advantage is modest: they sit 10th, while RFC Seraing are 14th. Both teams have recorded one win and two draws in their last five matches, so recent form does not separate them. The visitors’ defensive record could prove decisive, as they concede an average of 2.33 goals per away game, compared with Gent’s 1.5 goals conceded at home. However, the hosts need to improve their finishing, having failed to score in half of their home matches, while their average xG is only 0.98, against Seraing’s 1.05 away from home. Neither side has yet won a home or away match, respectively, so despite the lean towards Gent, a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 67% of their matches, above the league average of 55%. Neither has kept a clean sheet yet, and Gent II concede an average of 1.67 goals, while Seraing concede 2.33, giving both sides a chance to score. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 1.8 goals per game, with Seraing scoring an average of 1.8 and Gent II 1.2. Caution is warranted, however, as Gent II score just 0.67 goals per game this season and failed to score in 33% of their matches. Their average xG of 1.62 nonetheless points to the potential to create chances. Therefore, a goal from each team looks more likely than BTTS - No, which means at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In the teams’ previous meetings, at least 2 goals were scored every time, making this the strongest indicator in favour of Over 1.5 goals. Gent II concede an average of 1.67 goals, while Seraing concede 2.33, so both defences give their opponents opportunities to score. Over their last 5 matches, Gent II averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while Seraing averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.8 conceded. The projected total of 2.95 goals is also supported by the hosts’ xG of 1.62 and a league average of 3.07 goals per match. The 2.5 line is less certain, as it was cleared in 33% of Gent II’s matches and 67% of Seraing’s, making Over 1.5 goals the best pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is KAA Gent II leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time. The hosts led at half-time in 1 of their 3 matches, while RFC Seraing were trailing at that stage in 2 of 3, which points to an early Gent advantage. The hosts create more chances: their average xG is 1.62 compared with 1.05 for the visitors, and they average 6.33 shots on target against 3.33. After the break, Seraing conceded an average of 1.67 goals, so despite their attacking potential—as reflected in an average of 1.33 goals per match compared with Gent’s 0.67—the hosts’ ability to hold their lead has statistical backing. The pick remains uncertain, however, as both teams lost 2 of their 3 matches analysed, and Gent have yet to score after half-time in those games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
13Shots11
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
5Shots on target5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.42xG1.31
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
6Corners1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
34Dangerous attacks37
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Fouls16
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3Cards3
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.2Goals scored / match1
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.8Goals conceded / match2
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
49%Average possession41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3.2Shots on target / match4.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.2Shots per match10.67
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3.2Shots on target4.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
13%Shot conversion9.4%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
49%Possession41%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.08xG for1.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.86xG against1.38
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

KAA Gent II: Efficient finishingRFC Seraing: Balanced
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)35%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent II is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 0.4 pts / match - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II
LWDLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
RFC Seraing
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent II is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 1 goals / match - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - KAA Gent II · 2 goals / match - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent II scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: very strong

RFC Seraing scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)6
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Goals conceded (season)12
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
3Average goals in match3
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
6Goals scored (last 5)6
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal67%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%2 goals33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%3 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%2 goals83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%3 goals17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%4 goals0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%BTTS in both halves0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Scored in both halves0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 580%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - KAA Gent II · 1.17 pts / match - RFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.17
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%Clean sheet before half-time33%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
40%No goal before half-time50%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)0.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
20%Clean sheet after half-time17%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing
60%No goal after half-time83%
KAA Gent IIRFC Seraing

KAA Gent II - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KAA Gent IILigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match▼ 3.003.15▼ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 40%52%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%63%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 20%25%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%77%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▼ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.15
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RFC SeraingGoalAmine Messoussa
  2. RFC SeraingYellow cardVictor Corneillie
  3. RFC SeraingGoalTom LockmanAssist: Amine Messoussa
  4. KAA Gent IIYellow cardAbubakar Idris Abdullahi
  5. RFC SeraingYellow cardAnas Namri
  6. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Valerio Di CrescenzoOff: Tom Lockman
  7. KAA Gent IIYellow cardTrey Kongolo
  8. KAA Gent IIGoalDaniel James Wisdom
  9. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Nabil Bouchentouf IdrissOff: Alexandre Tunkadi
  10. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Joachim Djamba-ShangoOff: Mohammed El Âdfaoui
  11. KAA Gent IIYellow cardJemiah Umolu
  12. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Ruslan VydyshOff: Oleksandr Soroka
  13. KAA Gent IIGoalJemiah Umolu
  14. RFC SeraingYellow cardMoustapha Diop

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KAA Gent II 2 - 0 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

KAA Gent B
3 : 1
RFC Seraing
RFC Seraing
0 : 2
KAA Gent B

FAQ

What was the result of KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished KAA Gent II 3:2 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KAA Gent II won 2, RFC Seraing won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

KAA Gent II score 1.20 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.00. The First Division B average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 40% of KAA Gent II's matches and 67% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are KAA Gent II and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games KAA Gent II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RFC Seraing 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing?

The statistical background for KAA Gent II vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.