Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 01 September 2026

KäPa vs JIPPO: match statistics

KäPa crest
KäPa
1 : 3half-time 0:0
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

KäPa vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 20 August 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

KäPa: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. JIPPO: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.05 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.26 and concedes 0.84. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 63%, JIPPO 42%. Over 2.5: KäPa 68%, JIPPO 37%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.35. KäPa: 11.0 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.5.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.47. JIPPO: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 0-15 (5 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-4. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JIPPO sit 4th, while KäPa are eighth, and the overall season record clearly favors the visitors: 8 wins and just 4 defeats compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 11 losses. KäPa enter the match on a run of five consecutive defeats, scoring just 3 goals and conceding 10, which significantly reduces their chances despite home advantage. JIPPO average 1.56 goals per away match, while KäPa concede 1.44 at home; moreover, the visitors have failed to score in only 22% of their matches, compared with 44% for the hosts. JIPPO’s defense also looks more reliable, conceding 1.22 goals per away match and keeping a clean sheet in 33% of their games, compared with just 11% for KäPa. The hosts have slightly higher home xG, 1.48 compared with JIPPO’s 1.38 away from home, but their poor current scoring form and losing streak point to a higher probability of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which at least one team fails to score has a slight edge, as KäPa have averaged just 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches and have failed to score in 40% of their games this season. The hosts are on a five-match losing streak, with a conversion rate of only 6% despite averaging 15.4 shots per match. JIPPO have conceded an average of 1.2 goals in their last five appearances, with an xG against of 1.03, giving them a realistic chance of keeping the opponent’s weak attack at bay. The visitors should nevertheless find the net, as KäPa have conceded 2.0 goals per game in their last 5 league outings and allowed opponents an xG of 1.87, while JIPPO have created 1.59 xG. The seasonal BTTS rate for KäPa, at just 30%, also supports the “BTTS - No” pick, sitting well below the league average of 45%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 90% of KäPa’s matches and 78% of JIPPO’s fixtures this season. KäPa score only 1.00 goal on average at home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, although their recent defensive form has been weaker, with an average of 2.00 goals conceded in their last five matches. JIPPO have more convincing attacking arguments, averaging 1.56 goals, while generating an xG of 1.59 in their last five matches; however, their opponents conceded an average of 1.20 goals during that period. The hosts take as many as 15.4 shots and create 1.85 xG, but convert just 6% of their attempts, which limits their actual scoring potential. The projected total of 2.50 goals suggests the possibility of two or three goals, but leaves a clear preference for the scenario with fewer than four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JIPPO have a clearly stronger current run of form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.0 goals and collected 1.4 points per game, while KäPa have lost all five, scoring just 0.6 goals per match and conceding 2.0. The first half is particularly significant, as KäPa were trailing at the break in 80% of these matches, conceding an average of 1.4 goals before half-time, while JIPPO were level at half-time in as many as 60% of their last games. Over the broader sample, JIPPO led at the break in 44% of matches, compared with 20% for KäPa, while the hosts score just 0.3 goals per game before half-time. The visitors have also been more effective across the season, averaging 1.56 goals compared with KäPa’s 1.0, whereas the hosts’ recent form significantly reduces the relevance of their solid early-season defensive record. The most likely scenario is therefore that JIPPO exploit KäPa’s poor starts, take the lead at the break and hold it through to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
KäPaJIPPO
6Shots13
KäPaJIPPO
5Shots on target3
KäPaJIPPO
1.02xG1.4
KäPaJIPPO
2Corners5
KäPaJIPPO
39Dangerous attacks51
KäPaJIPPO
10Fouls8
KäPaJIPPO
1Cards1
KäPaJIPPO

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.05Goals scored / match1.26
KäPaJIPPO
1.68Goals conceded / match0.84
KäPaJIPPO
49%Average possession54%
KäPaJIPPO
3.32Shots on target / match4.95
KäPaJIPPO

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match13.53
KäPaJIPPO
3.32Shots on target4.95
KäPaJIPPO
9.6%Shot conversion9.3%
KäPaJIPPO
49%Possession54%
KäPaJIPPO
1.35xG for1.65
KäPaJIPPO
1.64xG against1.09
KäPaJIPPO

Shooting quality

KäPa: BalancedJIPPO: Balanced
KäPaJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)30%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KäPa
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W21% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-11
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
JIPPO
WDWLL
Season result split
42% W37% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-4
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - KäPa · 1.26 goals / match - JIPPO

JIPPO is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - KäPa · 0.84 goals / match - JIPPO

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

JIPPO scoring profile: very strong

JIPPO scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

20Goals scored (season)24
KäPaJIPPO
32Goals conceded (season)16
KäPaJIPPO
2.74Average goals in match2.11
KäPaJIPPO
3Goals scored (last 5)5
KäPaJIPPO
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
KäPaJIPPO

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
KäPaJIPPO
32%2 goals37%
KäPaJIPPO
5%3 goals21%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal58%
KäPaJIPPO
63%2 goals16%
KäPaJIPPO
16%3 goals11%
KäPaJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
KäPaJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time5%
KäPaJIPPO
0%BTTS in both halves5%
KäPaJIPPO
16%Scored in both halves11%
KäPaJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
KäPaJIPPO
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
KäPaJIPPO
60%BTTS - last 540%
KäPaJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
KäPaJIPPO
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
KäPaJIPPO
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
KäPaJIPPO

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
KäPaJIPPO
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
KäPaJIPPO
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
KäPaJIPPO

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JIPPO is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - KäPa · 1.42 pts / match - JIPPO

KäPa - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
32% leading47% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.42
KäPaJIPPO
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.58
KäPaJIPPO
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
KäPaJIPPO
1.37Average goals (1st half)1
KäPaJIPPO
53%Clean sheet before half-time74%
KäPaJIPPO
53%No goal before half-time63%
KäPaJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

0.63Points per match (2nd half)1.42
KäPaJIPPO
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
KäPaJIPPO
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
KäPaJIPPO
1.37Average goals (2nd half)1.11
KäPaJIPPO
32%Clean sheet after half-time63%
KäPaJIPPO
63%No goal after half-time58%
KäPaJIPPO

KäPa - second-half results

5% W47% R47% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - second-half results

32% W47% R21% P
27
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaJIPPO
Average goals in match 2.742.45 2.11
Both teams scored 63%44% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%44% 37%
Clean sheets 11%31% 42%
Goal before half-time 74%63% 58%
Goal after half-time 74%72% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JIPPOGoalJyri KiuruAssist: Lauri Sahimaa
  2. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Terrence SmithOff: Aleksi Tarvonen
  3. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Niklas LeinonenOff: Emil Ahola
  4. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Victor de PaulaOff: Miro Turunen
  5. JIPPOGoalTerrence SmithAssist: Jyri Kiuru
  6. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Toivo KoivurantaOff: Elmeri Lappalainen
  7. KäPaYellow cardAntonio Almen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): KäPa 0 - 1 - 4 JIPPO. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

JIPPO
3 : 0
KäPa
KäPa
0 : 2
JIPPO
JIPPO Joensuu
2 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
JIPPO Joensuu
3 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of KäPa vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 1:3 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and JIPPO?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KäPa won 0, JIPPO won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs JIPPO?

KäPa score 1.05 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.26. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KäPa's matches and 42% of JIPPO's.

What form are KäPa and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and JIPPO 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs JIPPO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.