Kauno Žalgiris vs FA Šiauliai: match statistics
Kauno Žalgiris vs FA Šiauliai: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kauno Žalgiris played FA Šiauliai in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: S. Dariaus ir S. Gireno stadionas. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Kauno Žalgiris: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FA Šiauliai: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kauno Žalgiris scores 1.90 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. FA Šiauliai scores 1.00 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kauno Žalgiris 48%, FA Šiauliai 57%. Over 2.5: Kauno Žalgiris 62%, FA Šiauliai 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Kauno Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.37. Kauno Žalgiris: 14.8 shots per match, FA Šiauliai: 11.2.
Match halves
Kauno Žalgiris: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.95. FA Šiauliai: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Kauno Žalgiris: 76-90+ (13 goals). FA Šiauliai: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 4-2-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kauno Žalgiris sit first and have scored 40 goals this season versus 21 for FA Šiauliai, giving the hosts a clear offensive edge. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 10 and conceded 3 (avg. 2.0 scored and 0.6 conceded per game), while the visitors have scored 6 and conceded 14 (avg. 1.2 scored and 2.8 conceded), clearly reflecting the gap in form and defense. At home Kauno averages 1.91 goals and concedes 0.64, possesses 61% possession, averages 14.73 shots and 4.91 on target per match with a 13% conversion rate, whereas Šiauliai away average 1.08 goals, concede 1.58, have 50% possession, 12.33 shots per game and a 9% conversion. xG also favors the hosts: Kauno’s average xG is 1.68 versus 1.45 for Šiauliai, and xG against is 1.05 versus 1.78 for the visitors, suggesting better control of chances. Considering 55% clean sheets for the hosts versus 17% for the visitors and 2.2 points per game in the hosts’ last 5 matches versus 0.6 for the visitors, I predict a Kauno win and assess the probabilities as 72% home, 18% draw and 10% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The visitors present a strong signal for BTTS - Yes: 75% of matches with both teams scoring this season and 80% in the last 5 matches, while the home side have only 33% this season and 40% in the last 5. Offensively the home team average 2.0 goals (10 goals) and xG 1.7 in their last 5 games, and the visitors average 1.2 goals and xG 1.14, indicating both teams can create scoring chances. The visitors’ defense looks weaker short-term — they concede 2.8 goals per game in the last 5 and have xG against 1.83, whereas the home side concede only 0.6 goals and have xG against 0.87, giving a mixed signal regarding clean sheets. Considering the visitors’ high BTTS rate (75%/80%) and the fact the home team have recently scored 2.0 goals on average, I estimate the probability of BTTS at approximately 65% versus 35% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining attacking xG (home 1.25, away 1.45) with opponents’ defensive xG (home 1.63, away 1.78) yields expected xG ≈1.52 for Kauno Žalgiris and ≈1.54 for FA Šiauliai, i.e. ~3.06 expected goals combined. With λ=3.06 the Poisson model gives roughly 81% probability of Over 1.5 goals, 59% for Over 2.5 goals and 36% for Over 3.5 goals. Seasonal stats reinforce this: home side have 89% of matches Over 1.5, away side 75%, and in the last 5 matches the hosts had 60% Over 2.5 while the visitors had 100% Over 2.5. Additionally both teams combine for an average of 22.11 shots per game (9.78 + 12.33) with 8.25 shots on target (3.67 + 4.58) at a conversion rate of 9%, which increases the likelihood of translating xG into goals, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches Kauno Žalgiris led at the break in 3 of 5 fixtures (60%), scoring an average of 1.0 goal by half-time versus 0.75 for FA Šiauliai and conceding only 0.2 goals by half-time compared to 1.0 for the visitors. Over the same period the home side won 60% of matches (3 of 5), scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding 0.6 per game, while Šiauliai have only a 20% win rate, averaging 1.2 scored and 2.8 conceded. On the season level the away side have yet to win (winPercentage_away 0.0%) and draw frequently (drawPercentage_away 58%), indicating that draws—not turnarounds—are their primary outcome. Although the visitors’ xG is slightly higher (1.45 vs 1.25), Kauno’s advantage in first-half defense over the last 5 matches (0.2 conceded vs 1.0) and their tendency to lead at the break suggest the hosts will hold their lead. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is HT/FT 1/1 — the home side lead at half-time and win at full-time, while an alternative scenario is a draw at half-time and a home turnaround to win at the final whistle (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kauno Žalgiris | FA Šiauliai | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kauno Žalgiris is 90% better for: goals scored per match.
1.9 goals / match - Kauno Žalgiris · 1 goals / match - FA Šiauliai
Kauno Žalgiris is 138% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - Kauno Žalgiris · 1.81 goals / match - FA Šiauliai
Kauno Žalgiris scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while FA Šiauliai keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
FA Šiauliai scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Kauno Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kauno Žalgiris
Over / Under - FA Šiauliai
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kauno Žalgiris is 135% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Kauno Žalgiris · 0.71 pts / match - FA Šiauliai
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kauno Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FA Šiauliai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kauno Žalgiris
FA Šiauliai
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Kauno Žalgiris | Liga | FA Šiauliai | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.58 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 32% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Kauno Žalgiris 4 - 2 - 0 FA Šiauliai. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kauno Žalgiris vs FA Šiauliai?
The A Lyga match finished Kauno Žalgiris 4:0 FA Šiauliai. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kauno Žalgiris and FA Šiauliai?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Kauno Žalgiris won 4, FA Šiauliai won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kauno Žalgiris vs FA Šiauliai?
Kauno Žalgiris score 1.90 goals per game on average and FA Šiauliai 1.00. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Kauno Žalgiris's matches and 57% of FA Šiauliai's.
What form are Kauno Žalgiris and FA Šiauliai in?
Over the last 5 games Kauno Žalgiris have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FA Šiauliai 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kauno Žalgiris vs FA Šiauliai?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


