Norway - EliteserienKFUM ArenaData current as of 30 October 2026

KFUM vs Aalesund: match statistics

KFUM crest
KFUM
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Aalesund crest
Aalesund

KFUM vs Aalesund: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KFUM played Aalesund in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: KFUM Arena. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KFUM: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Aalesund: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KFUM scores 1.05 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. Aalesund scores 1.58 and concedes 2.26. League average: 3.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KFUM 53%, Aalesund 84%. Over 2.5: KFUM 53%, Aalesund 63%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Aalesund has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.22. KFUM: 10.5 shots per match, Aalesund: 15.8.

Match halves

KFUM: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.37. Aalesund: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

KFUM: 16-30 (6 goals). Aalesund: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KFUM have a clear home advantage: they win 40% of their home fixtures, while Aalesund win just 13% of their away matches and lose as many as half of them. The hosts concede an average of 1.2 goals at home, with an xG against of 1.50, whereas the visitors’ defence allows opponents 2.13 goals and 2.12 xG per match and has kept no clean sheets. Aalesund are in better recent form, scoring 22 goals in their last five matches, but their away scoring rate over the season stands at just 1 goal per game, with an 8% shot conversion rate. KFUM have scored 7 and conceded 7 in their last five league fixtures, and the home advantage combined with Aalesund’s defensive weaknesses points to a narrow home win. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as the visitors have drawn 38% of their away matches and both teams sit near the bottom of the table, in 14th and 15th place.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators are very high: 91% for KFUM and 75% for Aalesund, well above the league average of 56%. KFUM have failed to score in none of their matches, while Aalesund have kept a clean sheet in 0% of games, strongly supporting the home team to score. Both defences regularly allow opponents to create chances: the average goals conceded is 2.36 by KFUM and 2.13 by Aalesund, with xG against at 1.86 and 2.12 respectively. Aalesund are also in excellent offensive form, averaging 4.4 goals and generating 1.80 xG across their last 5 matches, although KFUM’s lower 40% BTTS rate over this period slightly reduces confidence in the pick. Nevertheless, the strength of the seasonal data, the lack of clean sheets and the high attacking potential on both sides point to the more likely scenario of both teams scoring — BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: KFUM score an average of 2.00 goals, while Aalesund concede 2.13 goals per match. The hosts create an average of 1.99 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 2.12 xG, providing a solid basis for around two KFUM goals. Aalesund are significantly more dangerous in their current form, having scored 22 goals in their last five matches—4.4 per game—with an average xG of 1.80. At least two goals were scored in all KFUM matches and in 88% of Aalesund’s games, while both teams kept a clean sheet in none of their matches, at rates of 91% and 100%, respectively. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.35 goals and the very low frequency of matches finishing below two goals give this outcome a clear edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Aalesund are strongest in the early stages based on their current form: they held a lead at the break in all of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.6 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.4. Over the same period, KFUM were trailing at half-time in two of five games, with an average first-half output of 1.2 goals. The hosts have the stronger seasonal attacking profile, with an xG of 1.99 compared with 1.25 and 6.36 shots on target per match compared with 3.63, but their defence concedes an average of 2.36 goals. Aalesund have recently scored 4.4 goals per game and lost only one of their last five matches, so the most likely scenario is for the visitors to lead at the break and maintain their advantage through to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
KFUMAalesund
9Shots19
KFUMAalesund
5Shots on target3
KFUMAalesund
1.17xG1.8
KFUMAalesund
6Corners4
KFUMAalesund
33Dangerous attacks54
KFUMAalesund
10Fouls15
KFUMAalesund
1Cards5
KFUMAalesund

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.05Goals scored / match1.58
KFUMAalesund
1.74Goals conceded / match2.26
KFUMAalesund
45%Average possession43%
KFUMAalesund
4Shots on target / match5.21
KFUMAalesund

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.47Shots per match15.79
KFUMAalesund
4Shots on target5.21
KFUMAalesund
10.1%Shot conversion10%
KFUMAalesund
45%Possession43%
KFUMAalesund
1.22xG for1.68
KFUMAalesund
1.63xG against1.97
KFUMAalesund

Shooting quality

KFUM: BalancedAalesund: Attacking
KFUMAalesund
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KFUM is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - KFUM · 1 pts / match - Aalesund

KFUM
WWDLL
Season result split
26% W21% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Aalesund
LDDLW
Season result split
16% W47% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-7
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aalesund is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - KFUM · 1.58 goals / match - Aalesund

KFUM is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.74 goals / match - KFUM · 2.26 goals / match - Aalesund

KFUM scoring profile: very strong

KFUM scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Aalesund keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 matches).

Aalesund scoring profile: very strong

Aalesund scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

20Goals scored (season)30
KFUMAalesund
33Goals conceded (season)43
KFUMAalesund
2.79Average goals in match3.84
KFUMAalesund
5Goals scored (last 5)11
KFUMAalesund
8Goals conceded (last 5)14
KFUMAalesund

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal89%
KFUMAalesund
32%2 goals47%
KFUMAalesund
0%3 goals11%
KFUMAalesund
0%4 goals5%
KFUMAalesund

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal95%
KFUMAalesund
63%2 goals58%
KFUMAalesund
21%3 goals32%
KFUMAalesund
16%4 goals16%
KFUMAalesund

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

37%BTTS at half-time42%
KFUMAalesund
16%BTTS in both halves32%
KFUMAalesund
16%Scored in both halves42%
KFUMAalesund

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
KFUMAalesund
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KFUMAalesund
60%BTTS - last 580%
KFUMAalesund

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
KFUMAalesund
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
KFUMAalesund
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
KFUMAalesund

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
KFUMAalesund
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
KFUMAalesund
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
KFUMAalesund

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aalesund is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - KFUM · 1.37 pts / match - Aalesund

KFUM - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing
Aalesund - half-time state
32% leading42% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.37
KFUMAalesund
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.89
KFUMAalesund
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
KFUMAalesund
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.74
KFUMAalesund
37%Clean sheet before half-time37%
KFUMAalesund
42%No goal before half-time32%
KFUMAalesund

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)0.89
KFUMAalesund
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
KFUMAalesund
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1.42
KFUMAalesund
1.16Average goals (2nd half)2.11
KFUMAalesund
42%Clean sheet after half-time21%
KFUMAalesund
68%No goal after half-time37%
KFUMAalesund

KFUM - second-half results

11% W47% D42% L
19
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aalesund - second-half results

21% W26% D53% L
26
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KFUM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Aalesund - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.600.20
Goals scored / match1.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.2
Average goals in match2.42.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+6-9
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KFUM
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Aalesund
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
8
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
7
7
46-60
1
9
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KFUM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

Aalesund

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

KFUMLigaAalesund
Average goals in match▼ 2.793.14▲ 3.84
Both teams scored▼ 53%57%▲ 84%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 53%61%▲ 63%
Clean sheets▲ 26%24%▼ 5%
Goal before half-time• 84%85%▲ 89%
Goal after half-time▼ 68%79%▲ 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.14
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AalesundYellow cardCheikh Mbacke
  2. AalesundYellow cardSander Erik Kartum
  3. AalesundYellow cardOlafur Gudmundsson
  4. AalesundYellow cardLuca Podlech
  5. KFUMYellow cardDaniel Schneider
  6. AalesundYellow cardSimen Vatne Haram
  7. KFUMSubstitutionOn: Brage TobiassenOff: Martin Tangen Vinjor

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KFUM 0 - 1 - 0 Aalesund. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KFUM vs Aalesund?

The Eliteserien match finished KFUM 2:1 Aalesund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KFUM vs Aalesund?

KFUM score 1.05 goals per game on average and Aalesund 1.58. The Eliteserien average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 53% of KFUM's matches and 84% of Aalesund's.

What form are KFUM and Aalesund in?

Over the last 5 games KFUM have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Aalesund 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KFUM vs Aalesund?

The statistical background for KFUM vs Aalesund — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.