Greece - Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kifisia vs Volos NFC: match statistics

Kifisia crest
Kifisia
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Volos NFC crest
Volos NFC
145%(2.03)
X30%(3.20)
225%(3.10)

Kifisia looks slightly better in their clash against Volos NFC, which is reflected in the predicted outcome. The hosts hold a clear advantage in terms of offensive efficiency in home matches (averaging 1.25 goals per game with an xG of 1.51), whereas Volos averages only 1 goal with an xG of 1.18 in their away fixtures. A key factor is the visitors' dismal away form – a 67% loss rate and a mere 33% win rate, confirmed by a 12-match winless streak. Volos has not won any of their last 5 matches, accumulating just 0.6 points per game, contrasting with Kifisia's slightly better form (1 point per game). Nevertheless, the hosts' high draw percentage (33% in home matches) and the defensive issues of both teams (Kifisia concedes an average of 1.5 goals, Volos 1.58 away) suggest the match could be tight, hence a significant probability of a draw. The hosts' edge primarily stems from their superior offensive form and home advantage.

Kifisia vs Volos NFC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kifisia play Volos NFC in Super League (Greece). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kifisia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Volos NFC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kifisia scores 1.11 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Volos NFC scores 1.03 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kifisia 58%, Volos NFC 56%. Over 2.5: Kifisia 53%, Volos NFC 53%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Kifisia has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.22. Kifisia: 13.4 shots per match, Volos NFC: 11.2.

Match halves

Kifisia: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.56. Volos NFC: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Kifisia: 16-30 (10 goals). Volos NFC: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Kifisia looks slightly better in their clash against Volos NFC, which is reflected in the predicted outcome. The hosts hold a clear advantage in terms of offensive efficiency in home matches (averaging 1.25 goals per game with an xG of 1.51), whereas Volos averages only 1 goal with an xG of 1.18 in their away fixtures. A key factor is the visitors' dismal away form – a 67% loss rate and a mere 33% win rate, confirmed by a 12-match winless streak. Volos has not won any of their last 5 matches, accumulating just 0.6 points per game, contrasting with Kifisia's slightly better form (1 point per game). Nevertheless, the hosts' high draw percentage (33% in home matches) and the defensive issues of both teams (Kifisia concedes an average of 1.5 goals, Volos 1.58 away) suggest the match could be tight, hence a significant probability of a draw. The hosts' edge primarily stems from their superior offensive form and home advantage.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
KifisiaVolos NFC
12Shots11
KifisiaVolos NFC
7Shots on target2
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.55xG1.18
KifisiaVolos NFC
3Corners6
KifisiaVolos NFC
42Dangerous attacks48
KifisiaVolos NFC
20Fouls15
KifisiaVolos NFC
2Cards3
KifisiaVolos NFC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.11Goals scored / match1.03
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.42Goals conceded / match1.72
KifisiaVolos NFC
48%Average possession46%
KifisiaVolos NFC
4.81Shots on target / match3.63
KifisiaVolos NFC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.42Shots per match11.16
KifisiaVolos NFC
4.81Shots on target3.63
KifisiaVolos NFC
8.3%Shot conversion9.2%
KifisiaVolos NFC
48%Possession46%
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.48xG for1.22
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.39xG against1.5
KifisiaVolos NFC

Shooting quality

Kifisia: BalancedVolos NFC: Balanced
KifisiaVolos NFC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kifisia
WWLDW
Season result split
25% W39% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-13
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Volos NFC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W16% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-12
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kifisia is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - Kifisia · 1.03 goals / match - Volos NFC

Kifisia is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.42 goals / match - Kifisia · 1.72 goals / match - Volos NFC

Kifisia scoring profile: very strong

Kifisia scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Volos NFC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

Volos NFC scoring profile: strong

Volos NFC scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Kifisia keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

40Goals scored (season)33
KifisiaVolos NFC
51Goals conceded (season)55
KifisiaVolos NFC
2.53Average goals in match2.75
KifisiaVolos NFC
6Goals scored (last 5)6
KifisiaVolos NFC
6Goals conceded (last 5)16
KifisiaVolos NFC

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
KifisiaVolos NFC
31%2 goals25%
KifisiaVolos NFC
11%3 goals3%
KifisiaVolos NFC
0%4 goals3%
KifisiaVolos NFC

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
KifisiaVolos NFC
42%2 goals56%
KifisiaVolos NFC
22%3 goals22%
KifisiaVolos NFC
3%4 goals3%
KifisiaVolos NFC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time28%
KifisiaVolos NFC
6%BTTS in both halves6%
KifisiaVolos NFC
19%Scored in both halves13%
KifisiaVolos NFC

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
KifisiaVolos NFC
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
KifisiaVolos NFC
40%BTTS - last 580%
KifisiaVolos NFC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
KifisiaVolos NFC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
KifisiaVolos NFC
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
KifisiaVolos NFC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
KifisiaVolos NFC
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KifisiaVolos NFC
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
KifisiaVolos NFC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kifisia is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Kifisia · 1.06 pts / match - Volos NFC

Kifisia - half-time state
25% leading47% draw28% trailing
Volos NFC - half-time state
22% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.06
KifisiaVolos NFC
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KifisiaVolos NFC
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.28
KifisiaVolos NFC
50%Clean sheet before half-time41%
KifisiaVolos NFC
53%No goal before half-time59%
KifisiaVolos NFC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)0.91
KifisiaVolos NFC
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
KifisiaVolos NFC
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
KifisiaVolos NFC
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.47
KifisiaVolos NFC
50%Clean sheet after half-time34%
KifisiaVolos NFC
58%No goal after half-time59%
KifisiaVolos NFC

Kifisia - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
44
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Volos NFC - second-half results

16% W44% R41% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kifisia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Volos NFC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.8
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kifisia
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
10
6
16-30
5
13
31-45
5
10
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Volos NFC
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
10
16-30
5
9
31-45
4
8
46-60
6
13
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kifisia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Volos NFC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

KifisiaLigaVolos NFC
Average goals in match 2.532.57 2.75
Both teams scored 58%49% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 53%
Clean sheets 25%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 69%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 67%75% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kifisia 0 - 1 - 0 Volos NFC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kifisia vs Volos NFC?

The Super League match finished Kifisia 2:0 Volos NFC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kifisia vs Volos NFC?

Kifisia score 1.11 goals per game on average and Volos NFC 1.03. The Super League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Kifisia's matches and 56% of Volos NFC's.

What form are Kifisia and Volos NFC in?

Over the last 5 games Kifisia have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Volos NFC 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kifisia vs Volos NFC?

The statistical background for Kifisia vs Volos NFC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.