Scotland - PremiershipData current as of 23 July 2026

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: match statistics

Kilmarnock crest
Kilmarnock
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Hearts crest
Hearts
120%(4.50)
X25%(3.75)
255%(1.74)

Hearts occupy the first place in the table and display significantly better form and quality than Kilmarnock, who are ranked 11th. The hosts have a disastrous home record with a 57% loss rate and only 21% wins, conceding an average of 1.79 goals per match. Hearts, on the other hand, win 57% of their away games, scoring an average of 1.71 goals and conceding only 1.07 goals per match. The difference in efficiency (13% vs 9%) and ball possession (53% vs 45%) further favors the visitors. The recent form of both teams (0.8 PPG for Kilmarnock vs 1.8 PPG for Hearts) and Hearts' positive away goal difference (+9) compared to the hosts' negative home balance (-8) indicate a clear advantage for the away team in this clash.

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kilmarnock play Hearts in Premiership (Scotland). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kilmarnock: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Hearts: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kilmarnock scores 1.32 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Hearts scores 1.76 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kilmarnock 55%, Hearts 47%. Over 2.5: Kilmarnock 66%, Hearts 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Hearts has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.31. Kilmarnock: 11.4 shots per match, Hearts: 14.3.

Match halves

Kilmarnock: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.63. Hearts: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 1.03.

Goals by minute

Kilmarnock: 31-45+ (12 goals). Hearts: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premiership: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Hearts occupy the first place in the table and display significantly better form and quality than Kilmarnock, who are ranked 11th. The hosts have a disastrous home record with a 57% loss rate and only 21% wins, conceding an average of 1.79 goals per match. Hearts, on the other hand, win 57% of their away games, scoring an average of 1.71 goals and conceding only 1.07 goals per match. The difference in efficiency (13% vs 9%) and ball possession (53% vs 45%) further favors the visitors. The recent form of both teams (0.8 PPG for Kilmarnock vs 1.8 PPG for Hearts) and Hearts' positive away goal difference (+9) compared to the hosts' negative home balance (-8) indicate a clear advantage for the away team in this clash.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
KilmarnockHearts
11Shots15
KilmarnockHearts
4Shots on target3
KilmarnockHearts
1.38xG1.6
KilmarnockHearts
2Corners9
KilmarnockHearts
56Dangerous attacks59
KilmarnockHearts
13Fouls14
KilmarnockHearts
2Cards2
KilmarnockHearts

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.32Goals scored / match1.76
KilmarnockHearts
1.79Goals conceded / match0.89
KilmarnockHearts
42%Average possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
3.95Shots on target / match4.97
KilmarnockHearts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.39Shots per match14.26
KilmarnockHearts
3.95Shots on target4.97
KilmarnockHearts
11.5%Shot conversion12.4%
KilmarnockHearts
42%Possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
1.31xG for1.65
KilmarnockHearts
1.64xG against1.13
KilmarnockHearts

Shooting quality

Kilmarnock: BalancedHearts: Attacking
KilmarnockHearts
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kilmarnock is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 2 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock
LWWWW
Season result split
26% W26% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-18
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-8
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Hearts
WWDWL
Season result split
63% W21% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
24-8-6
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hearts is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 1.76 goals / match - Hearts

Hearts is 101% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 0.89 goals / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock scoring profile: strong

Kilmarnock scores in 74% of matches (28 of 38 matches), while Hearts keeps a clean sheet in 45% (17 of 38 matches).

Hearts scoring profile: very strong

Hearts scores in 89% of matches (34 of 38 matches), while Kilmarnock keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

50Goals scored (season)67
KilmarnockHearts
68Goals conceded (season)34
KilmarnockHearts
3.11Average goals in match2.66
KilmarnockHearts
13Goals scored (last 5)9
KilmarnockHearts
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
KilmarnockHearts

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal89%
KilmarnockHearts
37%2 goals61%
KilmarnockHearts
16%3 goals24%
KilmarnockHearts
5%4 goals3%
KilmarnockHearts

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal55%
KilmarnockHearts
53%2 goals21%
KilmarnockHearts
34%3 goals11%
KilmarnockHearts
11%4 goals3%
KilmarnockHearts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time21%
KilmarnockHearts
5%BTTS in both halves5%
KilmarnockHearts
24%Scored in both halves34%
KilmarnockHearts

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
KilmarnockHearts
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KilmarnockHearts
40%BTTS - last 580%
KilmarnockHearts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
KilmarnockHearts
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
KilmarnockHearts
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
KilmarnockHearts

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
KilmarnockHearts
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KilmarnockHearts
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
KilmarnockHearts

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hearts is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 1.5 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock - half-time state
39% leading24% draw37% trailing
Hearts - half-time state
37% leading39% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.5
KilmarnockHearts
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.74
KilmarnockHearts
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
KilmarnockHearts
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.24
KilmarnockHearts
50%Clean sheet before half-time58%
KilmarnockHearts
50%No goal before half-time42%
KilmarnockHearts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)2
KilmarnockHearts
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)1.03
KilmarnockHearts
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
KilmarnockHearts
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.42
KilmarnockHearts
39%Clean sheet after half-time68%
KilmarnockHearts
53%No goal after half-time34%
KilmarnockHearts

Kilmarnock - second-half results

26% W29% R45% P
54
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hearts - second-half results

55% W34% R11% P
57
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
76
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kilmarnock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Hearts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kilmarnock
ScoredConceded
4
10
0-15
10
11
16-30
12
6
31-45
9
14
46-60
5
11
61-75
10
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Hearts
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
13
8
16-30
11
6
31-45
12
6
46-60
10
2
61-75
17
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kilmarnock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Hearts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).

Teams vs league

KilmarnockLigaHearts
Average goals in match 3.112.78 2.66
Both teams scored 55%52% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 66%53% 53%
Clean sheets 24%28% 45%
Goal before half-time 82%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kilmarnock 0 - 1 - 1 Hearts. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Heart of Midlothian FC
1 : 1
Kilmarnock FC
Kilmarnock FC
0 : 3
Heart of Midlothian FC

FAQ

What was the result of Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

The Premiership match finished Kilmarnock 1:0 Hearts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kilmarnock and Hearts?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kilmarnock won 0, Hearts won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Kilmarnock score 1.32 goals per game on average and Hearts 1.76. The Premiership average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Kilmarnock's matches and 47% of Hearts's.

What form are Kilmarnock and Hearts in?

Over the last 5 games Kilmarnock have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Hearts 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.