Scotland - PremiershipData current as of 12 September 2026

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: match statistics

Kilmarnock crest
Kilmarnock
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Hearts crest
Hearts
120%(4.50)
X25%(3.75)
255%(1.74)

Hearts occupy the first place in the table and display significantly better form and quality than Kilmarnock, who are ranked 11th. The hosts have a disastrous home record with a 57% loss rate and only 21% wins, conceding an average of 1.79 goals per match. Hearts, on the other hand, win 57% of their away games, scoring an average of 1.71 goals and conceding only 1.07 goals per match. The difference in efficiency (13% vs 9%) and ball possession (53% vs 45%) further favors the visitors. The recent form of both teams (0.8 PPG for Kilmarnock vs 1.8 PPG for Hearts) and Hearts' positive away goal difference (+9) compared to the hosts' negative home balance (-8) indicate a clear advantage for the away team in this clash.

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kilmarnock played Hearts in Premiership (Scotland). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Kilmarnock: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Hearts: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kilmarnock scores 1.10 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Hearts scores 1.79 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kilmarnock 62%, Hearts 41%. Over 2.5: Kilmarnock 66%, Hearts 48%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Hearts has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.26. Kilmarnock: 10.9 shots per match, Hearts: 14.2.

Match halves

Kilmarnock: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.48. Hearts: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Kilmarnock: 31-45+ (10 goals). Hearts: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premiership: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hearts occupy the first place in the table and display significantly better form and quality than Kilmarnock, who are ranked 11th. The hosts have a disastrous home record with a 57% loss rate and only 21% wins, conceding an average of 1.79 goals per match. Hearts, on the other hand, win 57% of their away games, scoring an average of 1.71 goals and conceding only 1.07 goals per match. The difference in efficiency (13% vs 9%) and ball possession (53% vs 45%) further favors the visitors. The recent form of both teams (0.8 PPG for Kilmarnock vs 1.8 PPG for Hearts) and Hearts' positive away goal difference (+9) compared to the hosts' negative home balance (-8) indicate a clear advantage for the away team in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
KilmarnockHearts
11Shots15
KilmarnockHearts
4Shots on target3
KilmarnockHearts
1.38xG1.6
KilmarnockHearts
2Corners9
KilmarnockHearts
56Dangerous attacks59
KilmarnockHearts
13Fouls14
KilmarnockHearts
2Cards2
KilmarnockHearts

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.1Goals scored / match1.79
KilmarnockHearts
2.07Goals conceded / match0.83
KilmarnockHearts
41%Average possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
3.79Shots on target / match5.1
KilmarnockHearts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.9Shots per match14.24
KilmarnockHearts
3.79Shots on target5.1
KilmarnockHearts
10.1%Shot conversion12.6%
KilmarnockHearts
41%Possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
1.26xG for1.64
KilmarnockHearts
1.76xG against1.14
KilmarnockHearts

Shooting quality

Kilmarnock: BalancedHearts: Attacking
KilmarnockHearts
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hearts is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 1.8 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock
LWLDL
Season result split
14% W31% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-16
0.72 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-8
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 2.24BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Hearts
LWLWW
Season result split
66% W21% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
19-6-4
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-2-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hearts is 63% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 1.79 goals / match - Hearts

Hearts is 149% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 0.83 goals / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock scoring profile: mixed

Kilmarnock scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Hearts keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

Hearts scoring profile: very strong

Hearts scores in 90% of matches (26 of 29 matches), while Kilmarnock keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

32Goals scored (season)52
KilmarnockHearts
60Goals conceded (season)24
KilmarnockHearts
3.17Average goals in match2.62
KilmarnockHearts
9Goals scored (last 5)5
KilmarnockHearts
17Goals conceded (last 5)5
KilmarnockHearts

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal90%
KilmarnockHearts
28%2 goals62%
KilmarnockHearts
7%3 goals24%
KilmarnockHearts
3%4 goals3%
KilmarnockHearts

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal48%
KilmarnockHearts
62%2 goals21%
KilmarnockHearts
41%3 goals10%
KilmarnockHearts
14%4 goals3%
KilmarnockHearts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
KilmarnockHearts
7%BTTS in both halves3%
KilmarnockHearts
17%Scored in both halves38%
KilmarnockHearts

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
KilmarnockHearts
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KilmarnockHearts
100%BTTS - last 520%
KilmarnockHearts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
KilmarnockHearts
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
KilmarnockHearts
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KilmarnockHearts

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
KilmarnockHearts
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
KilmarnockHearts
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
KilmarnockHearts

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hearts is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 1.69 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock - half-time state
31% leading28% draw41% trailing
Hearts - half-time state
45% leading34% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.69
KilmarnockHearts
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.79
KilmarnockHearts
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
KilmarnockHearts
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.24
KilmarnockHearts
48%Clean sheet before half-time66%
KilmarnockHearts
55%No goal before half-time38%
KilmarnockHearts

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)2
KilmarnockHearts
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)1
KilmarnockHearts
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
KilmarnockHearts
1.79Average goals (2nd half)1.38
KilmarnockHearts
31%Clean sheet after half-time69%
KilmarnockHearts
55%No goal after half-time34%
KilmarnockHearts

Kilmarnock - second-half results

17% W31% D52% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-24
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding45%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hearts - second-half results

55% W34% D10% L
49
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kilmarnock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.02.4
Average goals in match2.03.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Hearts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kilmarnock
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
6
9
16-30
10
6
31-45
5
14
46-60
2
11
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Hearts
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
11
5
16-30
8
5
31-45
10
4
46-60
7
2
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kilmarnock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Hearts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).

Teams vs league

KilmarnockLigaHearts
Average goals in match 3.172.68 2.62
Both teams scored 62%51% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 66%50% 48%
Clean sheets 17%29% 52%
Goal before half-time 79%75% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%79% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Islam ChesnokovOff: Pierre Landry Kabore
  2. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Jordi AltenaOff: Michael Steinwender
  3. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Thomas Richard LoweryOff: David Watson
  4. KilmarnockYellow cardRobbie Deas
  5. HeartsYellow cardCraig Peter Halkett
  6. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Sabah KerjotaOff: Harry Milne
  7. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Frankie KentOff: Alexandros Kyziridis
  8. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Elton Daniël KabanguOff: Blair Spittal
  9. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Lewis MayoOff: Aaron Tshibola
  10. KilmarnockYellow cardLiam Polworth
  11. HeartsYellow cardIslam Chesnokov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

David DickinsonMatches officiated: 19
4.95Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 253%Home wins11%Draws37%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kilmarnock 0 - 1 - 1 Hearts. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Heart of Midlothian FC
1 : 1
Kilmarnock FC
Kilmarnock FC
0 : 3
Heart of Midlothian FC

FAQ

What was the result of Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

The Premiership match finished Kilmarnock 1:0 Hearts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kilmarnock and Hearts?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kilmarnock won 0, Hearts won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Kilmarnock score 1.10 goals per game on average and Hearts 1.79. The Premiership average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Kilmarnock's matches and 41% of Hearts's.

What form are Kilmarnock and Hearts in?

Over the last 5 games Kilmarnock have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Hearts 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.