Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Kitara vs Calvary: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Calvary crest
Calvary

Kitara vs Calvary: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara played Calvary in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 22 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Kitara: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Calvary: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.41 and concedes 0.59 goals per match. Calvary scores 0.41 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 32%, Calvary 23%. Over 2.5: Kitara 27%, Calvary 23%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.21. Kitara: 10.1 shots per match, Calvary: 4.0.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.45. Calvary: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). Calvary: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitara has a clear advantage at home: they have won 80% of home matches, score on average 2.1 goals and concede only 0.5 goals per game, giving a home goal difference of +16. Calvary have no away wins (0%), lose 91% of away fixtures, score 0.36 goals per game and fail to score in 73% of matches. In opportunity quality the hosts register 10.4 shots (4.8 on target) with a 20% conversion and have home xG 1.46 versus xG against 1.3, while the visitors average 8.3 shots (2.6 on target), a 5% conversion and xG for 1.14 on the road. Form also favours Kitara: in the last 5 matches the hosts collected 8 points (1.6 ppg) with a 2-2-1 record and goals 6:2, while Calvary have 4 points (0.8 ppg) with a 1-1-3 record and goals 3:7. Therefore I expect a home win and assess the probabilities at 82% for Kitara, 11% for a draw and 7% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are low: Kitara 18% and Calvary 27% versus a league average of 39%, and BTTS in the last 5 matches was only 20% for both teams. Calvary averages 0.36 goals this season and 0.6 in the last 5 (3 goals in 5), while Kitara has 1.2 goals in the last 5 (6 goals) and 0.45 for the season; at the same time Calvary concedes 1.4 goals in the last 5, and Kitara only 0.4, which reduces the visitors' chances of scoring. Seasonal goal figures show a large disparity: Kitara 31 scored and 13 conceded, Calvary 9 scored and 33 conceded, so the home side creates an offensive advantage while the visitors struggle with finishing. xG confirms the home advantage: Kitara xG_for 1.91 versus xG_against_away 1.82, and Calvary xG_for 1.14 against xG_against_home 1.66, which suggests limited real chances for the visitors. Additionally Kitara has 45% clean sheets this season (Calvary 9%), therefore I assess BTTS as less likely and recommend a NO (No Goal) selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kitara generates an expected xG of 1.91 per match, while Calvary concedes 1.82 xG, giving the hosts an estimated 1.87 goals; Calvary creates 1.14 xG and Kitara concedes 1.66 xG, yielding the visitors around 1.40 goals and a combined expected total of ~3.27 goals. Kitara averages 16 shots and 4.0 shots on target per match versus Calvary’s 8.3 and 2.6, and Calvary statistically concedes 2.18 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring affair. Using a Poisson distribution for a total of 3.27, the probability of at least 2 goals is ~84%, at least 3 goals ~63%, and 4+ goals ~41%. Considering the hosts’ offensive advantage and Calvary’s defensive vulnerability, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Kitara is in better form — over the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points per game versus 0.8 for Calvary (1.6 vs 0.8), and they led at the break in 40% of those fixtures compared to 20% for their opponents (40% vs 20%). The home side creates significantly more chances: xG 1.91 versus 1.14 for Calvary, with an average of 16 shots and 4 shots on target compared to 8.3 and 2.6 (1.91 vs 1.14 xG; 16.0 vs 8.3 shots; 4.0 vs 2.6 shots on target). Calvary have not recorded a win this season (0% wins) and concede an average of 2.18 goals per match, which lowers their prospects of match success (0.0% and 2.18). At the same time, half-time draws are frequent: the hosts drew in 50% of first halves, the visitors in 45% (50% vs 45%), so a draw at the break is a statistically strong signal. As a result, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kitara victory at full-time, hence the HT/FT pick: X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
KitaraCalvary
30Shots8
KitaraCalvary
6Shots on target4
KitaraCalvary
3.28xG1.19
KitaraCalvary
9Corners1
KitaraCalvary
134Dangerous attacks53
KitaraCalvary
-1Fouls-1
KitaraCalvary
-1Cards-1
KitaraCalvary

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.41Goals scored / match0.41
KitaraCalvary
0.59Goals conceded / match1.5
KitaraCalvary
44%Average possession20%
KitaraCalvary
4.27Shots on target / match0.86
KitaraCalvary

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.09Shots per match4
KitaraCalvary
4.27Shots on target0.86
KitaraCalvary
14%Shot conversion10.2%
KitaraCalvary
44%Possession20%
KitaraCalvary
1.54xG for1.21
KitaraCalvary
1.38xG against1.81
KitaraCalvary

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingCalvary: Balanced
KitaraCalvary
Accuracy (shots on target)42%22%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.30
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitara is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Kitara · 0.8 pts / match - Calvary

Kitara
DWWDL
Season result split
64% W18% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-4
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Calvary
LLLWD
Season result split
5% W27% D68% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-6-15
0.41 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.52BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 244% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - Kitara · 0.41 goals / match - Calvary

Kitara is 154% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.59 goals / match - Kitara · 1.5 goals / match - Calvary

Kitara scoring profile: very strong

Kitara scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

Calvary scoring profile: more difficult

Calvary scores in 27% of matches (6 of 22 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 matches).

31Goals scored (season)9
KitaraCalvary
13Goals conceded (season)33
KitaraCalvary
2Average goals in match1.91
KitaraCalvary
6Goals scored (last 5)3
KitaraCalvary
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
KitaraCalvary

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal27%
KitaraCalvary
36%2 goals14%
KitaraCalvary
18%3 goals0%
KitaraCalvary
9%4 goals0%
KitaraCalvary

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal73%
KitaraCalvary
9%2 goals32%
KitaraCalvary
0%3 goals23%
KitaraCalvary
0%4 goals18%
KitaraCalvary

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time9%
KitaraCalvary
5%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraCalvary
18%Scored in both halves0%
KitaraCalvary

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
KitaraCalvary
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KitaraCalvary
20%BTTS - last 520%
KitaraCalvary

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KitaraCalvary
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
KitaraCalvary
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KitaraCalvary

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time41%
KitaraCalvary
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
KitaraCalvary
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
KitaraCalvary

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 234% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.14 pts / match - Kitara · 0.64 pts / match - Calvary

Kitara - half-time state
64% leading23% draw14% trailing
Calvary - half-time state
5% leading50% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.14Points per match (1st half)0.64
KitaraCalvary
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.18
KitaraCalvary
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
KitaraCalvary
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.91
KitaraCalvary
82%Clean sheet before half-time55%
KitaraCalvary
36%No goal before half-time86%
KitaraCalvary

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)0.77
KitaraCalvary
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
KitaraCalvary
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
KitaraCalvary
0.82Average goals (2nd half)0.73
KitaraCalvary
64%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KitaraCalvary
68%No goal after half-time91%
KitaraCalvary

Kitara - second-half results

18% W59% D23% L
47
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Calvary - second-half results

5% W64% D32% L
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 5%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Calvary - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
8
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Calvary
ScoredConceded
4
10
0-15
0
6
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 39% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Calvary

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaCalvary
Average goals in match 2.002.09 1.91
Both teams scored 32%39% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 23%
Clean sheets 50%38% 27%
Goal before half-time 77%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 55%59% 41%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 1 - 0 - 0 Calvary. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs Calvary?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 0:0 Calvary. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Calvary?

Kitara score 1.41 goals per game on average and Calvary 0.41. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Kitara's matches and 23% of Calvary's.

What form are Kitara and Calvary in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Calvary 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Calvary?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.