Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kitara vs Police Uganda: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Police Uganda crest
Police Uganda

Kitara vs Police Uganda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara play Police Uganda in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Police Uganda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Police Uganda scores 1.40 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 38%, Police Uganda 63%. Over 2.5: Kitara 31%, Police Uganda 53%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.54. Kitara: 11.3 shots per match, Police Uganda: 10.5.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48. Police Uganda: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). Police Uganda: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back the home win (Kitara) because they win 69% of home matches and keep 62% clean sheets at home. The hosts concede on average 0.46 goals per home match versus 1.57 conceded by Police Uganda away, which gives Kitara a clear defensive edge. Offensively the teams are similar (38 goals scored by Kitara vs 40 by Police this season, both with 4 goals in the last 5 matches), but Kitara generates higher expected goals xG at home (1.69 vs 1.53 for Police away) and produces more shots on target (5.31 vs 3.5). Recent form slightly weakens the hosts — Kitara has not won any of their last 5 matches and averages 0.6 points per game in that span, while Police have 1 win and average 0.8 points per game — yet the defensive differences and quality of chances favor Kitara. In summary, home defensive advantage and better chance quality lead me to estimate probabilities of 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away side.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
KitaraPolice Uganda
14Shots7
KitaraPolice Uganda
7Shots on target4
KitaraPolice Uganda
2.01xG0.96
KitaraPolice Uganda
9Corners3
KitaraPolice Uganda
86Dangerous attacks30
KitaraPolice Uganda
13Fouls20
KitaraPolice Uganda
0Cards0
KitaraPolice Uganda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KitaraPolice Uganda
1.38Goals scored / match1.4
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.72Goals conceded / match1.2
KitaraPolice Uganda
46%Average possession46%
KitaraPolice Uganda
4.69Shots on target / match3.73
KitaraPolice Uganda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.31Shots per match10.47
KitaraPolice Uganda
4.69Shots on target3.73
KitaraPolice Uganda
12.2%Shot conversion13.4%
KitaraPolice Uganda
46%Possession46%
KitaraPolice Uganda
1.65xG for1.54
KitaraPolice Uganda
1.31xG against1.5
KitaraPolice Uganda

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingPolice Uganda: Counter-attacking
KitaraPolice Uganda
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Police Uganda
WLLDD
Season result split
43% W23% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Kitara · 1.2 goals / match - Police Uganda

Kitara scoring profile: very strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Police Uganda keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

Police Uganda scoring profile: strong

Police Uganda scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)42
KitaraPolice Uganda
21Goals conceded (season)36
KitaraPolice Uganda
2.1Average goals in match2.6
KitaraPolice Uganda
7Goals scored (last 5)5
KitaraPolice Uganda
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
KitaraPolice Uganda

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal83%
KitaraPolice Uganda
41%2 goals47%
KitaraPolice Uganda
14%3 goals7%
KitaraPolice Uganda
7%4 goals3%
KitaraPolice Uganda

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal77%
KitaraPolice Uganda
14%2 goals30%
KitaraPolice Uganda
3%3 goals10%
KitaraPolice Uganda
0%4 goals3%
KitaraPolice Uganda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time23%
KitaraPolice Uganda
3%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraPolice Uganda
21%Scored in both halves20%
KitaraPolice Uganda

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KitaraPolice Uganda
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
KitaraPolice Uganda
60%BTTS - last 540%
KitaraPolice Uganda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KitaraPolice Uganda
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KitaraPolice Uganda
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
KitaraPolice Uganda

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KitaraPolice Uganda
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
KitaraPolice Uganda
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
KitaraPolice Uganda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Kitara · 1.27 pts / match - Police Uganda

Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing
Police Uganda - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.27
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.57
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
KitaraPolice Uganda
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.13
KitaraPolice Uganda
76%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KitaraPolice Uganda
38%No goal before half-time53%
KitaraPolice Uganda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.47
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
KitaraPolice Uganda
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.4
KitaraPolice Uganda
62%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KitaraPolice Uganda
66%No goal after half-time47%
KitaraPolice Uganda

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police Uganda - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
38
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Police Uganda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Police Uganda
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
9
4
16-30
4
8
31-45
4
3
46-60
8
4
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Police Uganda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaPolice Uganda
Average goals in match 2.102.09 2.60
Both teams scored 38%38% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%35% 53%
Clean sheets 45%39% 23%
Goal before half-time 76%59% 67%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 1 - 0 - 0 Police Uganda. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs Police Uganda?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 2:2 Police Uganda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs Police Uganda?

Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and Police Uganda 1.40. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kitara's matches and 63% of Police Uganda's.

What form are Kitara and Police Uganda in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Police Uganda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs Police Uganda?

The statistical background for Kitara vs Police Uganda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.