Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 17 October 2026

Kitara vs SC Villa: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
2 : 0half-time 2:0
SC Villa crest
SC Villa

Kitara vs SC Villa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara played SC Villa in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 30 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Kitara: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. SC Villa: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.58 goals per match. SC Villa scores 1.46 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 33%, SC Villa 33%. Over 2.5: Kitara 29%, SC Villa 33%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.43. Kitara: 10.9 shots per match, SC Villa: 10.1.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.46. SC Villa: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). SC Villa: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Kitara wins 73% of home matches, averages 1.91 goals scored and concedes only 0.45 goals per game, records 64% clean sheets and home xG 1.64 versus xG against 1.29. SC Villa averages 1.00 goal on the road, registers 2.73 shots on target per away match and has 27% of away games without scoring, with away xG 1.35. In the last 5 matches Villa has won 4 of 5 and scored 8 goals (2.6 points per game), while Kitara has scored 5 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game in their last 5, giving the visitors a form edge. However, given Kitara’s clear home efficiency (16% conversion at home vs 10% for away and a low FTS rate 9% vs 27%), the hosts have the greater probability, though a draw or a Villa win remain possible.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (Both Teams To Score - No). Kitara’s season BTTS rate is 38%, SC Villa’s is 27%, and the league average BTTS is only 39%. A strong argument against BTTS is the high rate of clean sheets: Kitara has 62% clean sheets at home, SC Villa 55% away, and the league clean sheet rate reaches 76%. Additionally, both teams concede very few goals (Kitara 0.38 at home, SC Villa 0.64 away) and BTTS occurred in only 20% of the last 5 matches for both sides; in that period Kitara averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while SC Villa averaged 1.6 scored and 0.2 conceded. Looking at chance creation, Kitara has 1.5 xG, 4.58 shots on target and 17% conversion, whereas SC Villa has 1.35 xG, 2.73 shots on target and 10% conversion, which suggests that more often only one side finds the net. Considering the low season and recent BTTS rates and the prevailing clean sheets, I assess probability at 75% for 'No' and 25% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and shot balance estimates the total goals at around 2.67 (1.42 for Kitara vs 1.25 for SC Villa): home xG 1.50 versus away 1.35, with xG against 1.15 vs 1.33. Kitara averages 4.58 shots on target and has a conversion rate of 17%, while SC Villa has 2.73 shots on target and a 10% conversion, which increases the likelihood of a home goal. Seasonally Kitara’s matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 62% of cases, and SC Villa in 45%, while the Over 2.5 percentages are 38% and 27% — hence a weaker signal for Over 2.5. A Poisson simulation with lambda=2.67 gives ~75% probability for Over 1.5, ~50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5. Based on this, the best and strongest betting signal is Over 1.5 (back Over, line 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics indicate a clear advantage for Kitara: the hosts average 1.85 goals per match versus 1.00 for SC Villa and concede only 0.38 goals per match compared to 0.64 for their opponents; their xG is 1.50 versus 1.35 for the visitors, and shot conversion is 17% with an average of 4.58 shots on target compared to 10% and 2.73 for the opponents. At Half-Time Kitara score on average 0.75 goals and concede only 0.08, leading at the break in 42% of matches and keeping a clean sheet at Half-Time in 92% of games. In Second Halves the hosts also dominate — averaging 1.42 goals in the second half and winning 67% of those periods versus 0.73 goals and 18% for SC Villa — so a draw or a slim lead at the break frequently turns into a Kitara victory. Although SC Villa are in good form (80% wins in their last 5 matches versus 40% for the hosts), the home advantage in goals at the break, efficiency and xG makes the most likely scenario a Kitara lead at Half-Time and a home win after 90 minutes (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
KitaraSC Villa
11Shots9
KitaraSC Villa
6Shots on target2
KitaraSC Villa
1.51xG1.11
KitaraSC Villa
1Corners1
KitaraSC Villa
53Dangerous attacks54
KitaraSC Villa
21Fouls16
KitaraSC Villa
0Cards0
KitaraSC Villa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1.46
KitaraSC Villa
0.58Goals conceded / match0.5
KitaraSC Villa
45%Average possession50%
KitaraSC Villa
4.33Shots on target / match3.5
KitaraSC Villa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.92Shots per match10.13
KitaraSC Villa
4.33Shots on target3.5
KitaraSC Villa
12.6%Shot conversion14.4%
KitaraSC Villa
45%Possession50%
KitaraSC Villa
1.61xG for1.43
KitaraSC Villa
1.37xG against1.24
KitaraSC Villa

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingSC Villa: Efficient finishing
KitaraSC Villa
Accuracy (shots on target)40%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SC Villa is 63% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Kitara · 2.6 pts / match - SC Villa

Kitara
WDLDW
Season result split
63% W21% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-4
2.08 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
SC Villa
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W25% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-6-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SC Villa is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Kitara · 1.46 goals / match - SC Villa

SC Villa is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.58 goals / match - Kitara · 0.5 goals / match - SC Villa

Kitara scoring profile: mixed

Kitara scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 58% (14 of 24 matches).

SC Villa scoring profile: strong

SC Villa scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).

33Goals scored (season)35
KitaraSC Villa
14Goals conceded (season)12
KitaraSC Villa
1.96Average goals in match1.96
KitaraSC Villa
6Goals scored (last 5)9
KitaraSC Villa
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
KitaraSC Villa

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal79%
KitaraSC Villa
38%2 goals33%
KitaraSC Villa
17%3 goals17%
KitaraSC Villa
8%4 goals8%
KitaraSC Villa

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal42%
KitaraSC Villa
8%2 goals8%
KitaraSC Villa
0%3 goals0%
KitaraSC Villa
0%4 goals0%
KitaraSC Villa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time0%
KitaraSC Villa
4%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraSC Villa
21%Scored in both halves21%
KitaraSC Villa

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
KitaraSC Villa
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KitaraSC Villa
20%BTTS - last 520%
KitaraSC Villa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
KitaraSC Villa
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
KitaraSC Villa
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
KitaraSC Villa

2nd half

54%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
KitaraSC Villa
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KitaraSC Villa
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KitaraSC Villa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.13 pts / match - Kitara · 1.54 pts / match - SC Villa

Kitara - half-time state
63% leading25% draw13% trailing
SC Villa - half-time state
38% leading42% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.13Points per match (1st half)1.54
KitaraSC Villa
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.63
KitaraSC Villa
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
KitaraSC Villa
1.13Average goals (1st half)0.83
KitaraSC Villa
83%Clean sheet before half-time79%
KitaraSC Villa
38%No goal before half-time63%
KitaraSC Villa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1.83
KitaraSC Villa
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
KitaraSC Villa
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
KitaraSC Villa
0.83Average goals (2nd half)1.04
KitaraSC Villa
63%Clean sheet after half-time75%
KitaraSC Villa
67%No goal after half-time42%
KitaraSC Villa

Kitara - second-half results

17% W63% D21% L
51
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SC Villa - second-half results

42% W58% D0% L
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
SC Villa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
9
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
5
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

SC Villa
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
7
0
46-60
8
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

SC Villa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
180%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaSC Villa
Average goals in match▼ 1.962.09▼ 1.96
Both teams scored▼ 33%39%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%35%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 50%38%▲ 58%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%60%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▼ 54%60%▼ 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Patrick Kaddu⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KitaraGoalPatrick Kaddu

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 0 - 0 - 1 SC Villa. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

SC Villa
1 : 0
Kitara

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs SC Villa?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 2:0 SC Villa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs SC Villa?

Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and SC Villa 1.46. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitara's matches and 33% of SC Villa's.

What form are Kitara and SC Villa in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and SC Villa 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs SC Villa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kitara vs SC Villa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.