Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Kitara vs URA: match statistics

Kitara crest
Kitara
1 : 1half-time 1:0
URA crest
URA
175%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
25%(0.00)

Kitara is in outstanding form, having won all of their last five matches and occupying second place in the table with 11 wins this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 86% of their home matches while conceding only 0.57 goals per game on average and boasting an impressive goal difference of 22:10. URA is in a dire situation, occupying 14th place with just two wins this season and a disastrous away form – zero away wins, failing to score in 86% of their away matches, and averaging only 0.14 goals per away game. The disparity in form, offensive efficiency, and defensive stability is vast, which, combined with the home advantage, gives Kitara a decisive edge. Considering all statistics, a home win appears to be the most likely outcome of this match.

Kitara vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitara play URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 19 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 38%, URA 40%. Over 2.5: Kitara 31%, URA 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.56. Kitara: 11.3 shots per match, URA: 11.0.

Match halves

Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48. URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitara is in outstanding form, having won all of their last five matches and occupying second place in the table with 11 wins this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 86% of their home matches while conceding only 0.57 goals per game on average and boasting an impressive goal difference of 22:10. URA is in a dire situation, occupying 14th place with just two wins this season and a disastrous away form – zero away wins, failing to score in 86% of their away matches, and averaging only 0.14 goals per away game. The disparity in form, offensive efficiency, and defensive stability is vast, which, combined with the home advantage, gives Kitara a decisive edge. Considering all statistics, a home win appears to be the most likely outcome of this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
KitaraURA
7Shots8
KitaraURA
2Shots on target1
KitaraURA
1.13xG1.13
KitaraURA
7Corners4
KitaraURA
74Dangerous attacks75
KitaraURA
13Fouls16
KitaraURA
0Cards0
KitaraURA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.9
KitaraURA
0.72Goals conceded / match0.97
KitaraURA
46%Average possession51%
KitaraURA
4.69Shots on target / match4.37
KitaraURA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.31Shots per match11
KitaraURA
4.69Shots on target4.37
KitaraURA
12.2%Shot conversion8.2%
KitaraURA
46%Possession51%
KitaraURA
1.65xG for1.56
KitaraURA
1.31xG against1.38
KitaraURA

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingURA: Balanced
KitaraURA
Accuracy (shots on target)41%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

URA is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kitara · 1.4 pts / match - URA

Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Kitara · 0.9 goals / match - URA

Kitara is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Kitara · 0.97 goals / match - URA

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

URA scoring profile: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)27
KitaraURA
21Goals conceded (season)29
KitaraURA
2.1Average goals in match1.87
KitaraURA
7Goals scored (last 5)7
KitaraURA
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
KitaraURA

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal50%
KitaraURA
41%2 goals17%
KitaraURA
14%3 goals10%
KitaraURA
7%4 goals3%
KitaraURA

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal60%
KitaraURA
14%2 goals27%
KitaraURA
3%3 goals10%
KitaraURA
0%4 goals0%
KitaraURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time17%
KitaraURA
3%BTTS in both halves7%
KitaraURA
21%Scored in both halves13%
KitaraURA

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
KitaraURA
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KitaraURA
60%BTTS - last 560%
KitaraURA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
KitaraURA
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
KitaraURA
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KitaraURA

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
KitaraURA
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
KitaraURA
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
KitaraURA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Kitara · 1.17 pts / match - URA

Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing
URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.17
KitaraURA
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KitaraURA
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
KitaraURA
1.24Average goals (1st half)0.93
KitaraURA
76%Clean sheet before half-time60%
KitaraURA
38%No goal before half-time67%
KitaraURA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.17
KitaraURA
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
KitaraURA
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
KitaraURA
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.93
KitaraURA
62%Clean sheet after half-time60%
KitaraURA
66%No goal after half-time70%
KitaraURA

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaURA
Average goals in match 2.102.09 1.87
Both teams scored 38%38% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%35% 27%
Clean sheets 45%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 76%59% 57%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 1 - 0 - 0 URA. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitara vs URA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 1:1 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs URA?

Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and URA 0.90. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Kitara's matches and 40% of URA's.

What form are Kitara and URA in?

Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and URA 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs URA?

The statistical background for Kitara vs URA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.