Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraNamfua Football GroundData current as of 17 October 2026

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce played Mbeya City in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Namfua Football Ground. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Kitayosce: 0-2-2, 0.50 points/match. Mbeya City: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 0.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Mbeya City scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 75%, Mbeya City 25%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 25%, Mbeya City 25%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.39. Kitayosce: 7.5 shots per match, Mbeya City: 8.0.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25. Mbeya City: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (1 goals). Mbeya City: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mbeya City sit in 3rd place, having won 3 of their 4 matches so far and collected 10 points from their last five games, while Kitayosce are 13th with just 2 points and no wins. The hosts have scored only 3 goals in 4 matches and are yet to find the net at home, despite averaging 1.33 xG. Mbeya City have won every away match, averaging 2 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 100% of such appearances. The visitors also create more high-quality chances, recording away xG of 1.59 compared with Kitayosce’s 1.33 xG at home, while their shot conversion rate stands at 22%. The hosts’ defence is not particularly leaky, but their lack of attacking efficiency and Mbeya City’s perfect away record strongly point towards an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Mbeya City’s defense, which has not conceded a goal in the season data, keeping a clean sheet in 100% of matches. Kitayosce have averaged just 0.6 goals over their last five games and failed to score in 33% of their matches this season. At the same time, the visitors have been effective in attack, scoring an average of 2.0 goals per match and recording 4.0 shots on target compared with 2.0 for the hosts. Therefore, a win for the visitors with a clean sheet is more realistic than a goalless draw. BTTS has occurred in just 0% of Mbeya City’s matches and 33% of Kitayosce’s, well below the league average of 53%. Although Kitayosce’s latest xG stands at 1.56, the visitors’ solid defense and average of just 0.4 goals conceded across their last five appearances limit the hosts’ chances of scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest results point to a low-scoring game: Kitayosce have averaged 0.6 goals over their last 5 matches, while Mbeya City have conceded just 0.4 goals per game during this period. In the teams’ last five appearances, the 2.5-goal line was exceeded in only 20% of cases, while Mbeya City recorded 2 clean-sheet wins in the seasonal data. However, the hosts have a created xG of 1.56 and a conceded xG of 1.54, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring around 1 goal, but not suggesting an open game. Across all available data for both teams, every match finished below 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick with a projected total of 1.75 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Mbeya City win in the match, as the visitors have been level at the break in 100% of their league matches so far, without conceding a single goal in the first half. In their last five matches, both teams had a draw at half-time in 60% of cases, but Mbeya City conceded an average of just 0.2 goals in those games, compared with 0.6 for Kitayosce. After the break, the visitors score an average of 2.0 goals and keep a clean sheet, while the hosts score 1.0 goal but concede 0.33. Current form clearly favours Mbeya City: they have won 60% of their last five matches and scored an average of 1.2 goals, whereas Kitayosce have not won any of their matches, scoring 0.6 goals and conceding 1.0 on average. The visitors also have an attacking quality advantage, recording an average xG of 1.59 compared with 1.32 for the hosts, as well as 4 shots on target per match compared with 2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
KitayosceMbeya City
11Shots6
KitayosceMbeya City
3Shots on target1
KitayosceMbeya City
2.08xG1.41
KitayosceMbeya City
4Corners1
KitayosceMbeya City
159Dangerous attacks133
KitayosceMbeya City
7Fouls15
KitayosceMbeya City
0Cards0
KitayosceMbeya City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KitayosceMbeya City
0.75Goals scored / match1.5
KitayosceMbeya City
1.25Goals conceded / match0.5
KitayosceMbeya City
37%Average possession53%
KitayosceMbeya City
2.5Shots on target / match2.5
KitayosceMbeya City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.5Shots per match8
KitayosceMbeya City
2.5Shots on target2.5
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Shot conversion18.8%
KitayosceMbeya City
37%Possession53%
KitayosceMbeya City
1.56xG for1.39
KitayosceMbeya City
1.54xG against1.1
KitayosceMbeya City

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: BalancedMbeya City: Efficient finishing
KitayosceMbeya City
Accuracy (shots on target)33%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mbeya City is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / match - Kitayosce · 2.25 pts / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce
DLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 25%
Mbeya City
LWWW
Season result split
75% W0% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mbeya City is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.5 goals / match - Mbeya City

Mbeya City is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.5 goals / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Mbeya City scoring profile: very strong

Mbeya City scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

3Goals scored (season)6
KitayosceMbeya City
5Goals conceded (season)2
KitayosceMbeya City
2Average goals in match2
KitayosceMbeya City
3Goals scored (last 5)6
KitayosceMbeya City
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%2 goals75%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%3 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
KitayosceMbeya City
25%2 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%3 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Scored in both halves25%
KitayosceMbeya City

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KitayosceMbeya City
75%BTTS - last 525%
KitayosceMbeya City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KitayosceMbeya City
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceMbeya City

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
KitayosceMbeya City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Mbeya City - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.25
KitayosceMbeya City
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.25
KitayosceMbeya City
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
KitayosceMbeya City
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.5
KitayosceMbeya City
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
KitayosceMbeya City
50%No goal before half-time75%
KitayosceMbeya City

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)2.5
KitayosceMbeya City
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
KitayosceMbeya City
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
KitayosceMbeya City
0.75Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KitayosceMbeya City
50%Clean sheet after half-time75%
KitayosceMbeya City
75%No goal after half-time25%
KitayosceMbeya City

Kitayosce - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbeya City - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.251.00
Goals scored / match0.50.3
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.30.8
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%75%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.252.50
Goals scored / match0.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.51.5
1 goal50%75%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%75%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaMbeya City
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.61▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 75%50%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 25%42%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▼ 0%25%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%78%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time• 75%75%• 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+47%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Starting lineup

12Ousmane Kamissoko

Substitutes

22John Lazaruson 1'

Away team

Substitutes

15Djuma Shabanion 1'

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kitayosce 0 - 1 - 1 Mbeya City. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 0:0 Mbeya City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kitayosce and Mbeya City?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kitayosce won 0, Mbeya City won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

Kitayosce score 0.75 goals per game on average and Mbeya City 1.50. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kitayosce's matches and 25% of Mbeya City's.

What form are Kitayosce and Mbeya City in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 0-2-2 record (0.50 points per game) and Mbeya City 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.