Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

KMC vs Kitayosce: match statistics

KMC crest
KMC
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce

KMC vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KMC played Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 12 June 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Kitayosce: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KMC scores 0.57 and concedes 1.70 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.24 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KMC 30%, Kitayosce 36%. Over 2.5: KMC 39%, Kitayosce 44%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

KMC has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.22. KMC: 6.7 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.

Match halves

KMC: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.30. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

KMC: 46-60 (4 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce have 10 wins and 31 goals this season, while KMC have only 2 wins and 13 goals, giving the visitors a clear advantage in goal output and results. KMC have lost 5 of their last 5 matches, conceding 12 goals in that period and collecting 0 points, whereas Kitayosce in their last 5 fixtures have scored 8 goals, conceded 6 and hold a 2-1-2 record with 1.4 points per game. Creativity metrics show the home team generate on average xG 1.46 and 3.5 shots on target per home match versus 0.93 xG and 1.88 shots on target for the visitors away, yet KMC convert that into just 0.5 goals per home game and fail to score in 60% of their appearances. Defensively the overall balance also favors the visitors — Kitayosce have conceded 24 goals this season versus 39 for KMC, and the average goals conceded in the last 5 matches is 12 for KMC vs 6 for the visitors, indicating greater susceptibility from the hosts. In light of these figures I assess the probabilities as: Kitayosce win ~65%, draw 20%, KMC win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long metrics present a mixed picture: KMC at home scores 1.36 goals and concedes only 0.64 per match and has a 57% clean sheet rate, while seasonally both teams have BTTS at 36%. However, in the last 5 matches KMC conceded 12 goals (2.4 per match) and had 40% games with both teams scoring, and Kitayosce in the same period scored 8 goals (1.6 per match), conceded 6 (1.2 per match) and registered 80% BTTS. From a creation perspective guests’ xG is higher in the last 5 (1.64 vs 1.26 KMC), and KMC’s recent xG conceded is 1.89, suggesting the visitors are creating genuine chances against this defense. Although KMC at home averages 9.15 shots with 3.31 on target versus Kitayosce’s 4.88 and 1.88, the hosts’ recent form (5 straight defeats) and the high number of goals conceded increase the likelihood that both teams will score. Considering KMC’s 57% clean sheets this season versus the visitors’ 80% BTTS in the last 5, I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes at 65% over 35% No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate 1.32 expected goals for KMC and 1.10 for Kitayosce (total 2.42), based on average xG: KMC 1.39 and Kitayosce’s defense conceding 1.24 xG yields ~1.32, while Kitayosce’s 0.93 and KMC’s defense conceding 1.27 xG yields ~1.10. KMC averages 9.15 shots and 3.31 on target with a 14% conversion, whereas Kitayosce averages 4.88 shots and 1.88 on target with a 5% conversion, supporting the home side’s advantage in chance creation. Seasonally, Over1.5 rates are 64% for KMC and 73% for Kitayosce (average 68.5%); with expected 2.42 goals this provides a strong signal for Over1.5 — I rate it 70% vs 30% for Under1.5. I treat Over2.5 as nearly balanced at 48% Over vs 52% Under: seasonally KMC has Over2.5 in 36% of matches, Kitayosce 55%, league average Over2.5 is 39%, and the last 5 matches of both show Over2.5 in 60%, which partially increases Over chances but not enough to shift the edge. Over3.5 is unlikely (KMC 14% and Kitayosce 18% seasonally), so I assign Over3.5 16% vs Under 84%; my recommendation is the Over 1.5 bet (line 1.5) as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). KMC were level at the break in 64% of matches (9 times), whereas Kitayosce were level only in 30% and were trailing at half-time in 50%, which favors a draw in the first half. Over 90 minutes the edge goes to KMC: the hosts won 50% of fixtures versus 27% for the visitors, they have a higher xG (1.39 vs. 0.93) and more shots on target (3.31 vs. 1.88), and opponents concede on average 1.36 goals per game. However, KMC are in poor form (last 5 matches: 5 defeats), so I do not expect the hosts to be leading at the break (they led at half-time in only 21%, 3 times), which lowers the probability of 1/1 in favor of X/1. Additionally, the hosts kept a clean sheet in 57% of matches, which increases the realistic chance of a KMC turnaround in the second half and makes the visitors leading at the break unlikely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
KMCKitayosce
4Shots9
KMCKitayosce
1Shots on target6
KMCKitayosce
1.02xG1.71
KMCKitayosce
2Corners8
KMCKitayosce
94Dangerous attacks100
KMCKitayosce
19Fouls20
KMCKitayosce
0Cards0
KMCKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.24
KMCKitayosce
1.7Goals conceded / match0.96
KMCKitayosce
42%Average possession41%
KMCKitayosce
2.43Shots on target / match2.16
KMCKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.74Shots per match6.16
KMCKitayosce
2.43Shots on target2.16
KMCKitayosce
8.4%Shot conversion20.1%
KMCKitayosce
42%Possession41%
KMCKitayosce
1.26xG for1.22
KMCKitayosce
1.59xG against1.26
KMCKitayosce

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedKitayosce: Counter-attacking
KMCKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W13% R78% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-18
0.39 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kitayosce
LWDWL
Season result split
40% W28% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-8
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 118% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - KMC · 1.24 goals / match - Kitayosce

Kitayosce is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.7 goals / match - KMC · 0.96 goals / match - Kitayosce

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 39% of matches (9 of 23 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: very strong

Kitayosce scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

13Goals scored (season)31
KMCKitayosce
39Goals conceded (season)24
KMCKitayosce
2.26Average goals in match2.2
KMCKitayosce
5Goals scored (last 5)8
KMCKitayosce
12Goals conceded (last 5)6
KMCKitayosce

How often they score at least...

39%1 goal60%
KMCKitayosce
13%2 goals36%
KMCKitayosce
4%3 goals20%
KMCKitayosce
0%4 goals8%
KMCKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal60%
KMCKitayosce
39%2 goals28%
KMCKitayosce
35%3 goals8%
KMCKitayosce
9%4 goals0%
KMCKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time20%
KMCKitayosce
4%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCKitayosce
9%Scored in both halves16%
KMCKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
KMCKitayosce
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
KMCKitayosce
40%BTTS - last 580%
KMCKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
KMCKitayosce
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
KMCKitayosce
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
KMCKitayosce

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
KMCKitayosce
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
KMCKitayosce
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KMCKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - KMC · 1.12 pts / match - Kitayosce

KMC - half-time state
13% leading48% draw39% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading52% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.12
KMCKitayosce
0.26Goals scored (1st half)0.6
KMCKitayosce
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
KMCKitayosce
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.12
KMCKitayosce
48%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KMCKitayosce
74%No goal before half-time64%
KMCKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

0.7Points per match (2nd half)1.4
KMCKitayosce
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
KMCKitayosce
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
KMCKitayosce
1.13Average goals (2nd half)0.92
KMCKitayosce
43%Clean sheet after half-time68%
KMCKitayosce
78%No goal after half-time64%
KMCKitayosce

KMC - second-half results

9% W43% R48% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - second-half results

32% W44% R24% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.0
Average goals in match2.40.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
6
46-60
0
7
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
202%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 2.262.14 2.20
Both teams scored 30%36% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%39% 44%
Clean sheets 13%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 65%58% 60%
Goal after half-time 61%63% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.84
Away goals / match
+55%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Chamou Karaboue⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KitayosceGoalChamou Karaboue

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KMC 0 - 0 - 1 Kitayosce. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KMC vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Kitayosce?

KMC score 0.57 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.24. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 30% of KMC's matches and 36% of Kitayosce's.

What form are KMC and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Kitayosce 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Kitayosce?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KMC vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.