Norway - First DivisionGjemselund StadionData current as of 23 July 2026

Kongsvinger vs Åsane: match statistics

Kongsvinger crest
Kongsvinger
3 : 1half-time 0:1
Åsane crest
Åsane

Kongsvinger vs Åsane: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kongsvinger play Åsane in First Division (Norway). The match date is 31 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Gjemselund Stadion. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Åsane: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Åsane scores 1.43 and concedes 2.14. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kongsvinger 79%, Åsane 43%. Over 2.5: Kongsvinger 86%, Åsane 64%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.24. Kongsvinger: 14.7 shots per match, Åsane: 9.6.

Match halves

Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50. Åsane: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). Åsane: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the home win: Kongsvinger scores an average of 2.75 goals per home match and has won all their home games (100% wins), while Åsane averages only 0.25 goals per away match and has no away wins. The hosts generate more quality chances — on average 6 shots on target and 13.25 attempts per home match versus 3.5 shots on target and 12.25 attempts for Åsane away, with Kongsvinger’s conversion at 21% compared to just 2% for the visitors. In xG terms Kongsvinger has 1.67 xG at home versus 1.42 xG for Åsane away, confirming the superiority of the quality of chances; in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 10 goals against 6 for the guests. Defensively the hosts concede an average of 1 goal at home, while Åsane concedes 2 away and have not kept a clean sheet on the road yet (0% clean sheets); additionally Åsane fail to score in 75% of away matches, which severely limits their chances. For these reasons I assess probabilities at 75% for the home side, 15% for a draw and 10% for an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
KongsvingerÅsane
29Shots4
KongsvingerÅsane
6Shots on target2
KongsvingerÅsane
2.97xG0.61
KongsvingerÅsane
10Corners1
KongsvingerÅsane
103Dangerous attacks29
KongsvingerÅsane
11Fouls11
KongsvingerÅsane
1Cards1
KongsvingerÅsane

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.57Goals scored / match1.43
KongsvingerÅsane
1.5Goals conceded / match2.14
KongsvingerÅsane
54%Average possession47%
KongsvingerÅsane
6.21Shots on target / match4.29
KongsvingerÅsane

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.71Shots per match9.64
KongsvingerÅsane
6.21Shots on target4.29
KongsvingerÅsane
17.5%Shot conversion14.8%
KongsvingerÅsane
54%Possession47%
KongsvingerÅsane
1.77xG for1.24
KongsvingerÅsane
1.55xG against1.78
KongsvingerÅsane

Shooting quality

Kongsvinger: AttackingÅsane: Counter-attacking
KongsvingerÅsane
Accuracy (shots on target)42%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kongsvinger is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 1.2 pts / match - Åsane

Kongsvinger
WWDLW
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Åsane
LWLWL
Season result split
29% W7% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-9
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.86Opponent xG: 2.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 1.43 goals / match - Åsane

Kongsvinger is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 2.14 goals / match - Åsane

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

Åsane scoring profile: very strong

Åsane scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

36Goals scored (season)20
KongsvingerÅsane
21Goals conceded (season)30
KongsvingerÅsane
4.07Average goals in match3.57
KongsvingerÅsane
16Goals scored (last 5)8
KongsvingerÅsane
11Goals conceded (last 5)11
KongsvingerÅsane

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal64%
KongsvingerÅsane
86%2 goals50%
KongsvingerÅsane
50%3 goals21%
KongsvingerÅsane
21%4 goals7%
KongsvingerÅsane

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal79%
KongsvingerÅsane
36%2 goals50%
KongsvingerÅsane
14%3 goals43%
KongsvingerÅsane
14%4 goals21%
KongsvingerÅsane

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time21%
KongsvingerÅsane
7%BTTS in both halves7%
KongsvingerÅsane
50%Scored in both halves29%
KongsvingerÅsane

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
KongsvingerÅsane
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
KongsvingerÅsane
100%BTTS - last 560%
KongsvingerÅsane

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
KongsvingerÅsane
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
KongsvingerÅsane
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
KongsvingerÅsane

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
KongsvingerÅsane
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KongsvingerÅsane
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
KongsvingerÅsane

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 1.07 pts / match - Åsane

Kongsvinger - half-time state
43% leading14% draw43% trailing
Åsane - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.07
KongsvingerÅsane
1.07Goals scored (1st half)0.43
KongsvingerÅsane
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)1
KongsvingerÅsane
1.93Average goals (1st half)1.43
KongsvingerÅsane
36%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KongsvingerÅsane
36%No goal before half-time57%
KongsvingerÅsane

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per match (2nd half)1.29
KongsvingerÅsane
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
KongsvingerÅsane
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)1.14
KongsvingerÅsane
2.14Average goals (2nd half)2.14
KongsvingerÅsane
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
KongsvingerÅsane
21%No goal after half-time50%
KongsvingerÅsane

Kongsvinger - second-half results

64% W14% R21% P
20
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Åsane - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kongsvinger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.40
Goals scored / match1.41.8
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match3.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Åsane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
11
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Åsane
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Åsane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

KongsvingerLigaÅsane
Average goals in match 4.073.75 3.57
Both teams scored 79%60% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 86%73% 64%
Clean sheets 14%21% 21%
Goal before half-time 93%77% 71%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kongsvinger 0 - 2 - 0 Åsane. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Åsane Fotball
0 : 0
Kongsvinger IL
Kongsvinger IL
1 : 1
Åsane Fotball

FAQ

What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Åsane?

The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 3:1 Åsane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Åsane?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 0, Åsane won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Åsane?

Kongsvinger score 2.57 goals per game on average and Åsane 1.43. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's matches and 43% of Åsane's.

What form are Kongsvinger and Åsane in?

Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Åsane 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Åsane?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kongsvinger vs Åsane: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.