Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

KTP vs JäPS: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

KTP vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KTP play JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 11 September 2026.

Current form

KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. JäPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KTP scores 1.73 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.95 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KTP 45%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: KTP 45%, JäPS 45%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.25. KTP: 14.6 shots per match, JäPS: 10.5.

Match halves

KTP: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.05. JäPS: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

KTP: 76-90+ (10 goals). JäPS: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.39)
(4.90)
(7.00)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.73Goals scored / match0.95
KTPJäPS
0.95Goals conceded / match1.41
KTPJäPS
48%Average possession45%
KTPJäPS
5.27Shots on target / match3.45
KTPJäPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.59Shots per match10.5
KTPJäPS
5.27Shots on target3.45
KTPJäPS
11.8%Shot conversion9.1%
KTPJäPS
48%Possession45%
KTPJäPS
1.71xG for1.25
KTPJäPS
1.28xG against1.58
KTPJäPS

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingJäPS: Balanced
KTPJäPS
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 114% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - KTP · 1.4 pts / match - JäPS

KTP
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
73% W14% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-3-3
2.32 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
JäPS
WLLDW
Season result split
45% W9% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-10
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 82% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - KTP · 0.95 goals / match - JäPS

KTP is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - KTP · 1.41 goals / match - JäPS

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).

JäPS scoring profile: mixed

JäPS scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).

38Goals scored (season)21
KTPJäPS
21Goals conceded (season)31
KTPJäPS
2.68Average goals in match2.36
KTPJäPS
8Goals scored (last 5)5
KTPJäPS
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
KTPJäPS

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal64%
KTPJäPS
55%2 goals23%
KTPJäPS
18%3 goals9%
KTPJäPS
9%4 goals0%
KTPJäPS

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal55%
KTPJäPS
18%2 goals41%
KTPJäPS
14%3 goals23%
KTPJäPS
5%4 goals14%
KTPJäPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time9%
KTPJäPS
14%BTTS in both halves0%
KTPJäPS
45%Scored in both halves9%
KTPJäPS

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
KTPJäPS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
KTPJäPS
40%BTTS - last 540%
KTPJäPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
KTPJäPS
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
KTPJäPS
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
KTPJäPS

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
KTPJäPS
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
KTPJäPS
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
KTPJäPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - KTP · 1.36 pts / match - JäPS

KTP - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing
JäPS - half-time state
32% leading41% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)1.36
KTPJäPS
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.45
KTPJäPS
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
KTPJäPS
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.86
KTPJäPS
64%Clean sheet before half-time64%
KTPJäPS
41%No goal before half-time64%
KTPJäPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.95Points per match (2nd half)1.18
KTPJäPS
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
KTPJäPS
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KTPJäPS
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KTPJäPS
64%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KTPJäPS
27%No goal after half-time64%
KTPJäPS

KTP - second-half results

55% W32% R14% P
34
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JäPS - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
30
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KTP
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
8
2
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
4
7
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaJäPS
Average goals in match 2.682.52 2.36
Both teams scored 45%43% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%45% 45%
Clean sheets 45%32% 45%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 64%
Goal after half-time 82%72% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KTP 2 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

When do KTP and JäPS play?

KTP face JäPS on 11 September 2026 in Ykkösliiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between KTP and JäPS?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, JäPS won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs JäPS?

KTP score 1.73 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.95. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 45% of KTP's matches and 27% of JäPS's.

What form are KTP and JäPS in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and JäPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs JäPS?

The statistical background for KTP vs JäPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.