KTP vs JäPS: match statistics
KTP vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP played JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. JäPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.73 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.95 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 45%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: KTP 45%, JäPS 45%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.26. KTP: 14.6 shots per match, JäPS: 10.5.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.05. JäPS: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
KTP: 76-90+ (10 goals). JäPS: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP sit top of the table and are in excellent form, having won all of their last 5 matches while scoring 8 goals and conceding just 2. At home, the hosts win 73% of their matches, averaging 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.83, whereas JäPS score only 1.00 goal per away game and fail to score in 36% of their away appearances. KTP also create significantly more danger, averaging 14.91 shots and 5.91 shots on target, compared with 10.73 and 3.45 for the visitors. JäPS’s defence concedes an average of 1.91 goals away from home, with an xG against of 1.72, and the team have lost 55% of such matches. The difference in current form, KTP’s superior chance quality and their highly solid home record all clearly point towards a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from KTP, whose matches have seen both teams score in only 9% of cases this season, while 64% of games ended with a clean sheet. The hosts are also in excellent defensive form: they have conceded just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while JäPS scores only 1.0 goal on average. JäPS has a weak defense, conceding 1.91 goals per match this season, which supports the likelihood of KTP scoring but does not, in itself, increase the chances of an away goal. Although the last five matches for both teams produced BTTS in 40% of cases, KTP’s season figure is clearly below the league average of 43%, making it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KTP are in excellent scoring form: they have scored 8 goals and conceded just 2 in their last five matches, averaging 1.6 and 0.4 goals per game, respectively. JäPS conceded 1.4 goals per game during this period and as many as 1.91 across the season, giving the hosts a solid projected total of around 1.48 goals. At the same time, KTP have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches this season, and only 9% of their games have produced more than 3.5 goals; for JäPS, this high-scoring outcome occurred in 36% of matches. The combined xG figures of 1.27 and 1.24 point to a game more likely to produce 2-3 goals than an open, high-scoring contest. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has a clear edge, as it only loses if there are at least four goals, while KTP’s defensive profile significantly reduces the likelihood of that scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KTP have been clearly superior recently, winning all of their last five matches while scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding just 0.4. The hosts held a lead at the break in 80% of those games, while JäPS were behind at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances. Across the season, KTP concede just 0.18 goals per match before the break and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 82% of their fixtures, while JäPS score only 0.36 goals during this period. The hosts’ advantage is also reflected in the full-match record: they have a 55% win rate compared with the visitors’ 36%, while JäPS concede an average of 1.91 goals per game. The most likely outcome is therefore KTP leading at half-time and securing the win after the final whistle, corresponding to the HT/FT 1/1 selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 114% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - KTP · 1.4 pts / match - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 82% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - KTP · 0.95 goals / match - JäPS
KTP is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.95 goals / match - KTP · 1.41 goals / match - JäPS
KTP scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).
JäPS scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - KTP · 1.36 pts / match - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.68 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 45% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 45% | • 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 32% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 64% | • 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 72% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): KTP 2 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 3:0 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and JäPS?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, JäPS won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs JäPS?
KTP score 1.73 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.95. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 45% of KTP's matches and 27% of JäPS's.
What form are KTP and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and JäPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs JäPS?
The statistical background for KTP vs JäPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.