Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData current as of 17 October 2026

KTP vs KäPa: match statistics

KTP crest
KTP
2 : 1half-time 1:0
KäPa crest
KäPa

KTP vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KTP played KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. KäPa: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KTP scores 1.72 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.06 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KTP 44%, KäPa 61%. Over 2.5: KTP 44%, KäPa 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.36. KTP: 15.2 shots per match, KäPa: 11.1.

Match halves

KTP: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.06. KäPa: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). KäPa: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP are top of the table and have won 12 of their 18 matches this season, while KäPa have recorded just 4 victories and suffered 10 defeats. At home, the hosts win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2.00 goals and create chances worth 1.87 xG, whereas KäPa score only 1.00 goal away from home with 1.25 xG. The difference is also evident defensively: KTP concede 1.11 goals per home match, compared with as many as 1.89 for the visitors, who keep a clean sheet in only 11% of their away games. Current form further favours the hosts, who have scored 10 goals and recorded 3 wins in their last five matches, while KäPa have managed 4 goals and lost 4 of their 5 games during the same period. KTP also register significantly more shots on target at home, averaging 5.89 compared with KäPa’s 2.89 away from home, which should translate into a clear advantage for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by the fact that both teams scored in 56% of KTP’s matches this season and in as many as 67% of KäPa’s, clearly above the league average of 43%. Both sides keep a clean sheet in only 11% of their matches, while KäPa concede an average of 1.89 goals per game, significantly increasing KTP’s chances of scoring. The hosts are in better offensive form, averaging 2.0 goals over their last five matches with an xG of 1.71, while KTP’s defence allows opponents an xG of 1.51. KäPa have scored only 0.8 goals per game during this period, but their xG stands at 1.47, so the potential for a single goal remains greater than their results alone suggest. The teams’ recent run has produced BTTS in 60% of matches, making a scenario in which both sides score moderately the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 78% of their matches this season, providing a highly consistent and strong signal for the Over. KTP averaged 2.0 goals scored across their last five matches, while KäPa conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts create an average of 1.48 xG, while the visitors allow opponents 1.60 xG, giving KTP clear grounds to score at least one or two goals. KäPa also have the potential to respond, as KTP concede an average of 1.44 goals, while both teams kept a clean sheet in only 11% of matches. The projected total of 2.80 goals primarily supports Over 1.5, which is a safer option than the more volatile 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a KTP win, as the hosts were level at the break in 5 of their 9 matches, while KäPa were trailing at half-time in 4 of 9. KTP are clearly in better form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.0 goals, won three times and collected 2.0 points per game, whereas KäPa have scored 0.8 goals, failed to win any match and lost 4 of 5. The hosts’ advantage should grow after the break, as KTP have averaged 1.4 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded in the second half of their last five appearances, while the visitors have scored just 0.4. KTP also create more chances over the course of the season, recording an xG of 1.48 compared with 1.25 and averaging 3.89 shots on target against KäPa’s 2.89, while the visitors’ defence concedes an average of 1.89 goals per match. Therefore, the recommended HT/FT pick is X/1: a draw at half-time and a KTP win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
KTPKäPa
21Shots10
KTPKäPa
8Shots on target2
KTPKäPa
2.29xG1.04
KTPKäPa
5Corners3
KTPKäPa
59Dangerous attacks37
KTPKäPa
12Fouls9
KTPKäPa
2Cards2
KTPKäPa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.72Goals scored / match1.06
KTPKäPa
1.06Goals conceded / match1.67
KTPKäPa
50%Average possession49%
KTPKäPa
5.39Shots on target / match3.39
KTPKäPa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.22Shots per match11.06
KTPKäPa
5.39Shots on target3.39
KTPKäPa
11.3%Shot conversion9.5%
KTPKäPa
50%Possession49%
KTPKäPa
1.78xG for1.36
KTPKäPa
1.24xG against1.6
KTPKäPa

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingKäPa: Balanced
KTPKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 900% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KTP · 0.2 pts / match - KäPa

KTP
WLDWW
Season result split
67% W17% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-3
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
KäPa
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W22% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-10
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.72 goals / match - KTP · 1.06 goals / match - KäPa

KTP is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - KTP · 1.67 goals / match - KäPa

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: mixed

KäPa scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).

31Goals scored (season)19
KTPKäPa
19Goals conceded (season)30
KTPKäPa
2.78Average goals in match2.72
KTPKäPa
10Goals scored (last 5)4
KTPKäPa
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
KTPKäPa

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
KTPKäPa
50%2 goals33%
KTPKäPa
22%3 goals6%
KTPKäPa
11%4 goals0%
KTPKäPa

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal89%
KTPKäPa
22%2 goals61%
KTPKäPa
17%3 goals17%
KTPKäPa
6%4 goals0%
KTPKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time22%
KTPKäPa
17%BTTS in both halves0%
KTPKäPa
39%Scored in both halves17%
KTPKäPa

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
KTPKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KTPKäPa
60%BTTS - last 560%
KTPKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
KTPKäPa
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time56%
KTPKäPa
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
KTPKäPa

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
KTPKäPa
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
KTPKäPa
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
KTPKäPa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KTP · 1.22 pts / match - KäPa

KTP - half-time state
28% leading50% draw22% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
28% leading39% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.22
KTPKäPa
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.61
KTPKäPa
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KTPKäPa
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.39
KTPKäPa
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KTPKäPa
44%No goal before half-time50%
KTPKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.94Points per match (2nd half)0.61
KTPKäPa
1.06Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
KTPKäPa
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
KTPKäPa
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.33
KTPKäPa
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KTPKäPa
33%No goal after half-time67%
KTPKäPa

KTP - second-half results

56% W28% D17% L
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding239%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - second-half results

6% W44% D50% L
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KTP
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
8
1
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaKäPa
Average goals in match▲ 2.782.45▲ 2.72
Both teams scored• 44%44%▲ 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 44%44%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 44%31%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%62%▲ 72%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%72%• 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardMustapha Coker
  2. KäPaYellow cardReko Huhtamäki
  3. KäPaGoalOtto Heinonen
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Joni MäkeläOff: Otto Huttunen
  5. KäPaYellow cardPessi Lähteenmäki
  6. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Niklas LeinonenOff: Daniel Ripatti
  7. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Antti PastinenOff: Reko Huhtamäki
  8. KTPYellow cardAapo Ruohio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KTP 2 - 0 - 0 KäPa. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KTP vs KäPa?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 2:1 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KTP and KäPa?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, KäPa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs KäPa?

KTP score 1.72 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.06. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of KTP's matches and 61% of KäPa's.

What form are KTP and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KäPa 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs KäPa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KTP vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.