KTP vs MP: match statistics
KTP vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 25 September 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. MP: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.83 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. MP scores 1.08 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 42%, MP 46%. Over 2.5: KTP 50%, MP 42%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.36. KTP: 14.5 shots per match, MP: 11.5.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.13. MP: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
KTP: 76-90+ (13 goals). MP: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP are the leaders of the home table and have won 18 of their 24 matches this season, while MP have recorded just 8 victories and 12 defeats. The hosts are in excellent form: they have won all of their last five matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding just 1, whereas MP have registered 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats over the same period. At home, KTP average 2.08 goals per match, with an xG of 1.81, while MP score only 1.00 goal away from home and fail to find the net in 33% of matches. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in chance creation: they average 14.5 shots and 5.92 shots on target per match, compared with 10.75 and 4.08 for the visitors. MP lose as many as 67% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.42 goals on the road, making another victory for the in-form KTP the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is primarily weakened by KTP’s excellent defensive form over their last five matches: the hosts have conceded just 1 goal, averaging 0.2 per game, and both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. MP scores an average of 1.0 goal per season and fail to score in as many as 33% of matches, which, given their opponent’s current form, significantly limits their chances of finding the net. The seasonal BTTS figures are also not particularly high, standing at 50% for KTP and 42% for MP, compared with the league average of 44%. Although MP have recently created chances worth 1.48 xG, KTP are on a run of five consecutive wins and are simultaneously allowing opponents very little, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely. This supports the BTTS - No / No Goal selection, which means that at least one team will not score—it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KTP are in excellent form, having won their last five matches and scoring an average of 2.2 goals in that run, while MP conceded 1.6 goals per game over the same period. At the same time, the hosts have allowed just 0.2 goals per match across their last five appearances, significantly limiting the prospects of a high-scoring performance from the visitors. Seasonal xG indicators point to a match producing around 2.45 goals: KTP average 1.41 xG and MP 1.31, yet both teams have seen Over 3.5 goals land in only 25% of their matches. Furthermore, 75% of each team’s games finished with a maximum of three goals, making Under 3.5 the outcome best supported by the data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KTP have won all of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.2 goals and conceding just 0.2, while MP conceded an average of 1.6 goals over the same period. The hosts held a lead at the break in 80% of their last five matches and did not concede before half-time on any occasion, whereas MP were trailing at half-time in 60% of those matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals in the first half. KTP also have a clearly superior points record across the season, averaging 1.50 points per match compared with MP’s 0.83, while the visitors have lost 67% of their matches. After the interval, KTP maintain their superior form, recently scoring an average of 1.4 goals and conceding 0.2, whereas MP score only 0.4 goals. The most likely scenario is therefore an HT/FT outcome of 1/1, with KTP taking the lead before half-time and converting it into a full-time victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 114% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - KTP · 1.4 pts / match - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 69% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - KTP · 1.08 goals / match - MP
KTP is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - KTP · 1.42 goals / match - MP
KTP scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).
MP scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - KTP · 1.42 pts / match - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.71 | 2.58 | • 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 44% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): KTP 1 - 1 - 0 MP. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 1:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and MP?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 1, MP won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs MP?
KTP score 1.83 goals per game on average and MP 1.08. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 42% of KTP's matches and 46% of MP's.
What form are KTP and MP in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and MP 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs MP?
The statistical background for KTP vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


