Finland - VeikkausliigaSavon Sanomat AreenaData current as of 30 October 2026

KuPS vs Gnistan: match statistics

KuPS crest
KuPS
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Gnistan crest
Gnistan

KuPS vs Gnistan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS played Gnistan in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 29 October 2026. Venue: Savon Sanomat Areena. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

KuPS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Gnistan: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.55 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Gnistan scores 1.48 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 55%, Gnistan 55%. Over 2.5: KuPS 38%, Gnistan 45%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.50. KuPS: 14.9 shots per match, Gnistan: 13.2.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.55. Gnistan: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 31-45+ (13 goals). Gnistan: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 5-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 57%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KuPS sit 1st in the table and average 1.64 goals at home, while fourth-placed Gnistan score 1.21 per game away. The hosts create better chances: their average home xG is 1.73, compared with 1.26 for the visitors away, and Gnistan’s defence allows chances worth 1.68 xG per match on the road. KuPS concede an average of 1.07 goals at home, while Gnistan concede 1.29 away; the hosts also keep clean sheets more often, in 36% of matches compared with 14% for the visitors. However, both teams are in poor form: KuPS have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, while Gnistan have failed to win any and have conceded 10 goals across those games. Home advantage favours KuPS, but their recent results and 36% home draw rate temper confidence in this prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Over the season, both teams scored in 60% of KuPS matches and 50% of Gnistan matches, but over their last 5 games those rates fell to 20% and 40%, respectively. Both sides have recently averaged just 0.8 goals per match, weakening the case for goals at both ends. The visitors’ scoring in particular looks uncertain: Gnistan failed to score in 36% of their matches this season, compared with 20% for KuPS. The risk to the BTTS - No pick is that the hosts have recently conceded an average of 1.6 goals, while the visitors have conceded 2.0. However, the recent struggles of both attacks give a slight edge to the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 80% of KuPS matches and 79% of Gnistan matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. KuPS average 1.73 goals scored, while Gnistan concede 1.29; additionally, KuPS’s xG stands at 1.72, while their opponents allow chances worth 1.68 xG. The visitors average 1.21 goals scored, and KuPS concede 1.53, which also supports going over this line. Caution at higher totals is warranted by the teams’ last five matches: both averaged just 0.8 goals scored, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 20% and 40% of their matches, respectively. A forecast of 2.75 goals therefore points to a clearer edge on Over 1.5 than on bets at higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is a realistic scenario: KuPS were level at the break in 47% of their matches, compared with 36% for Gnistan, while the visitors went into half-time level in 3 of their last 5 games. After the break, season statistics favor the hosts: they score an average of 1.07 goals in the second half, while Gnistan concede 0.86 goals during that period and lose half of their second halves. KuPS also have greater attacking potential over the full match — their average xG is 1.72 compared with their opponents’ 1.26, and they average 5.27 shots on target versus 3.71. The X/1 selection therefore assumes a competitive opening followed by a decisive result after the break, although its confidence is tempered by the poor form of both teams: KuPS have won once in their last 5 matches, while Gnistan have not won at all.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
KuPSGnistan
17Shots9
KuPSGnistan
8Shots on target1
KuPSGnistan
2.13xG0.92
KuPSGnistan
12Corners5
KuPSGnistan
68Dangerous attacks39
KuPSGnistan
14Fouls16
KuPSGnistan
2Cards2
KuPSGnistan

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.55Goals scored / match1.48
KuPSGnistan
0.97Goals conceded / match1.41
KuPSGnistan
56%Average possession42%
KuPSGnistan
5.17Shots on target / match4.52
KuPSGnistan

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.9Shots per match13.21
KuPSGnistan
5.17Shots on target4.52
KuPSGnistan
10.4%Shot conversion11.2%
KuPSGnistan
56%Possession42%
KuPSGnistan
1.7xG for1.5
KuPSGnistan
1.27xG against1.6
KuPSGnistan

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantGnistan: Balanced
KuPSGnistan
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - KuPS · 0.4 pts / match - Gnistan

KuPS
WLLWD
Season result split
48% W34% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-5
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Gnistan
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-9
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.55 goals / match - KuPS · 1.48 goals / match - Gnistan

KuPS is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - KuPS · 1.41 goals / match - Gnistan

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

Gnistan scoring profile: strong

Gnistan scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

45Goals scored (season)43
KuPSGnistan
28Goals conceded (season)41
KuPSGnistan
2.52Average goals in match2.9
KuPSGnistan
6Goals scored (last 5)4
KuPSGnistan
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
KuPSGnistan

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal72%
KuPSGnistan
48%2 goals41%
KuPSGnistan
21%3 goals24%
KuPSGnistan
7%4 goals7%
KuPSGnistan

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal79%
KuPSGnistan
17%2 goals34%
KuPSGnistan
7%3 goals14%
KuPSGnistan
3%4 goals10%
KuPSGnistan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time24%
KuPSGnistan
7%BTTS in both halves7%
KuPSGnistan
21%Scored in both halves28%
KuPSGnistan

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
KuPSGnistan
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KuPSGnistan
20%BTTS - last 540%
KuPSGnistan

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
KuPSGnistan
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
KuPSGnistan
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KuPSGnistan

2nd half

66%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KuPSGnistan
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KuPSGnistan
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
KuPSGnistan

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.86 pts / match - KuPS · 1.24 pts / match - Gnistan

KuPS - half-time state
52% leading31% draw17% trailing
Gnistan - half-time state
28% leading41% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.86Points per match (1st half)1.24
KuPSGnistan
1Goals scored (1st half)0.62
KuPSGnistan
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
KuPSGnistan
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.28
KuPSGnistan
66%Clean sheet before half-time52%
KuPSGnistan
38%No goal before half-time52%
KuPSGnistan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.59
KuPSGnistan
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
KuPSGnistan
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
KuPSGnistan
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.62
KuPSGnistan
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
KuPSGnistan
62%No goal after half-time48%
KuPSGnistan

KuPS - second-half results

21% W52% D28% L
54
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 48%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gnistan - second-half results

45% W24% D31% L
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Gnistan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
7
2
16-30
13
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gnistan
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
10
31-45
9
8
46-60
8
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Gnistan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaGnistan
Average goals in match• 2.522.55▲ 2.90
Both teams scored▲ 55%48%▲ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%44%• 45%
Clean sheets• 31%30%▼ 21%
Goal before half-time▲ 76%71%• 72%
Goal after half-time▼ 66%73%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GnistanYellow cardDanny Marcos Pérez Valdez
  2. KuPSYellow cardValentín Román Gasc
  3. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Kosmo LaunialaOff: Artur Atarah
  4. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Saku HeiskanenOff: Clinton Antwi
  5. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Otto HannulaOff: Roman Eremenko
  6. GnistanYellow cardKosmo Launiala
  7. KuPSYellow cardJulius Eskesen
  8. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Juhani OjalaOff: Joakim Latonen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): KuPS 5 - 2 - 0 Gnistan. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 57% matches.

Gnistan
1 : 1
KuPS
Gnistan
0 : 1
KuPS
KuPS
1 : 0
Gnistan
Kuopion Palloseura
1 : 1
IF Gnistan
IF Gnistan
0 : 4
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
6 : 2
IF Gnistan
IF Gnistan
1 : 2
Kuopion Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of KuPS vs Gnistan?

The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 1:1 Gnistan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and Gnistan?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches KuPS won 5, Gnistan won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs Gnistan?

KuPS score 1.55 goals per game on average and Gnistan 1.48. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 55% of KuPS's matches and 55% of Gnistan's.

What form are KuPS and Gnistan in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gnistan 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs Gnistan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KuPS vs Gnistan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.