Finland - VeikkausliigaSavon Sanomat AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

KuPS vs Ilves: match statistics

KuPS crest
KuPS
4 : 3half-time 4:1
Ilves crest
Ilves

KuPS vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS played Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 23 June 2026. Venue: Savon Sanomat Areena. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

KuPS: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Ilves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.46 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.58 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 69%, Ilves 58%. Over 2.5: KuPS 38%, Ilves 67%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.22. KuPS: 14.9 shots per match, Ilves: 9.7.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77. Ilves: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 31-45+ (5 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-3. Average goals 3.60, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a KuPS win. The hosts have a clear defensive advantage at home – conceding on average 0.71 goals per match and recording 43% clean sheets, while Ilves concedes 2.5 goals on average away and has registered no clean sheets on the road. KuPS generates greater attacking threat at home: average xG 1.79, 5.29 shots on target and 15.57 shots per match with a 10% conversion rate, whereas Ilves away has xG 1.14 and only 3.5 shots on target with 47% possession. Ilves shows strong overall form (12 goals and 4 wins in the last 5 matches), but that form is weaker away (0% wins and 50% losses on the road). Considering KuPS’s unbeaten home record (0% home losses), superior xG metrics and shot advantage, I assess the probabilities as 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

KuPS shows a strong defense: seasonally they keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches and concede on average 1.0 goal per game, and in the last 5 matches they concede only 0.6 goals on average. Ilves, on the other hand, has a season BTTS rate of 83% and concedes 2.5 goals seasonally, and in the last 5 matches scores an average of 2.4 goals, showing offensive potential but defensive instability. In xG terms KuPS produces 1.31 xG at home, while Ilves allows 1.91 xG away — averaged expected goals are around 1.6 for KuPS; conversely Ilves has 1.14 xG away, and KuPS allows 1.29 xG (avg ~1.2 for Ilves). Additionally KuPS registers more shots on target (4.67 vs 3.5) and has better conversion (19% vs 14%), which increases their chance of scoring while maintaining a tight defense. Considering KuPS’s high clean sheet percentage and defensive form (last 5 matches: goal balance 5-3, form W D D D W), I assess No BTTS as more likely (62% vs 38%), hence selection: No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I calculate expected goals: KuPS 1.61 (KuPS attack xG 1.31 and Ilves defense xG 1.91), Ilves 1.21 (Ilves attack xG 1.14 and KuPS defense xG 1.29), totaling 2.82 goals. At this sum the Poisson model indicates roughly a 77% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 54% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and about 31% for 4+ (Over 3.5). Seasonal stats reinforce the signal: Ilves away has 100% of matches over 1.5 and 83% over 2.5, while KuPS at home has 67% over 1.5 and 50% over 2.5; additionally Ilves concedes on average 2.5 goals away and in 83% of away matches both teams scored. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (Over 1.5 = 78%/Under 22%); Over 2.5 has a moderate edge (60%/40%), and Over 3.5 is less certain (35%/65%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves appears stronger in the first half — in 60% of their last five matches the visitors held a lead at the break and scored an average of 1.8 goals by half-time, whereas KuPS averaged just 0.2 goals by half-time in their last five. Despite this, KuPS at home have a 67% win rate, score on average 1.83 goals per match and possess a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.14 for Ilves), giving them superior quality of chances. KuPS average 4.67 shots on target versus 3.5 for Ilves and have a higher conversion rate (19% vs 14%), and they have also scored four goals in minutes 76–90; Ilves, meanwhile, concede on average 2.5 goals away. Overall the most likely scenario is Ilves leading at half-time with a KuPS turnaround in the second half (HT/FT 2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

4 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
KuPSIlves
13Shots12
KuPSIlves
5Shots on target7
KuPSIlves
1.65xG1.74
KuPSIlves
4Corners4
KuPSIlves
67Dangerous attacks69
KuPSIlves
8Fouls15
KuPSIlves
1Cards1
KuPSIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.46Goals scored / match1.58
KuPSIlves
0.92Goals conceded / match1.75
KuPSIlves
58%Average possession48%
KuPSIlves
5.15Shots on target / match4.08
KuPSIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.92Shots per match9.67
KuPSIlves
5.15Shots on target4.08
KuPSIlves
9.8%Shot conversion16.4%
KuPSIlves
58%Possession48%
KuPSIlves
1.76xG for1.22
KuPSIlves
1.08xG against1.6
KuPSIlves

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantIlves: Efficient finishing
KuPSIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 22% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - KuPS · 1.8 pts / match - Ilves

KuPS
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
46% W46% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-1
1.85 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ilves
LWLWW
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - KuPS · 1.58 goals / match - Ilves

KuPS is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - KuPS · 1.75 goals / match - Ilves

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

19Goals scored (season)19
KuPSIlves
12Goals conceded (season)21
KuPSIlves
2.38Average goals in match3.33
KuPSIlves
9Goals scored (last 5)9
KuPSIlves
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
KuPSIlves

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal92%
KuPSIlves
38%2 goals42%
KuPSIlves
23%3 goals8%
KuPSIlves
0%4 goals8%
KuPSIlves

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal67%
KuPSIlves
15%2 goals58%
KuPSIlves
0%3 goals33%
KuPSIlves
0%4 goals8%
KuPSIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time25%
KuPSIlves
8%BTTS in both halves17%
KuPSIlves
31%Scored in both halves33%
KuPSIlves

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KuPSIlves
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KuPSIlves
80%BTTS - last 520%
KuPSIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
KuPSIlves
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
KuPSIlves
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
KuPSIlves

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
KuPSIlves
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KuPSIlves
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KuPSIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
42% leading25% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)1.5
KuPSIlves
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.92
KuPSIlves
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)1
KuPSIlves
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.92
KuPSIlves
54%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KuPSIlves
46%No goal before half-time33%
KuPSIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.33
KuPSIlves
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
KuPSIlves
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
KuPSIlves
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.42
KuPSIlves
54%Clean sheet after half-time42%
KuPSIlves
38%No goal after half-time42%
KuPSIlves

KuPS - second-half results

38% W46% R15% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
18
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.21.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
5
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
3
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaIlves
Average goals in match 2.382.56 3.33
Both teams scored 69%51% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%46% 67%
Clean sheets 23%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 77%74% 92%
Goal after half-time 77%77% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesYellow cardTatu Miettunen
  2. KuPSYellow cardClinton Antwi
  3. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  4. IlvesGoalJoona VeteliAssist: Jardell Kanga
  5. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Stanislav BaranovOff: Kalle Wallius
  6. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Arttu HeinonenOff: Valentín Román Gasc

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): KuPS 1 - 1 - 3 Ilves. Average goals 3.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Ilves
1 : 3
KuPS
Tampereen Ilves
1 : 1
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
2 : 4
Tampereen Ilves
Kuopion Palloseura
0 : 3
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 0
Kuopion Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of KuPS vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 4:3 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and Ilves?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KuPS won 1, Ilves won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs Ilves?

KuPS score 1.46 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.58. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 69% of KuPS's matches and 58% of Ilves's.

What form are KuPS and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ilves 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs Ilves?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.