Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 August 2026

KuPS vs TPS: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

KuPS vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS play TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 9 August 2026.

Current form

KuPS: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. TPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.83 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. TPS scores 1.28 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 61%, TPS 50%. Over 2.5: KuPS 44%, TPS 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.44. KuPS: 15.7 shots per match, TPS: 11.6.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.72. TPS: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 31-45+ (10 goals). TPS: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.47)
(4.45)
(6.15)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.28
KuPSTPS
0.89Goals conceded / match1.11
KuPSTPS
57%Average possession47%
KuPSTPS
6.06Shots on target / match4.44
KuPSTPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.72Shots per match11.61
KuPSTPS
6.06Shots on target4.44
KuPSTPS
11.7%Shot conversion11%
KuPSTPS
57%Possession47%
KuPSTPS
1.84xG for1.44
KuPSTPS
1.19xG against1.59
KuPSTPS

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantTPS: Balanced
KuPSTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 150% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - KuPS · 1.2 pts / match - TPS

KuPS
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
61% W33% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-1
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
TPS
LWLLW
Season result split
39% W22% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-7
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - KuPS · 1.28 goals / match - TPS

KuPS is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - KuPS · 1.11 goals / match - TPS

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

33Goals scored (season)23
KuPSTPS
16Goals conceded (season)20
KuPSTPS
2.72Average goals in match2.39
KuPSTPS
14Goals scored (last 5)8
KuPSTPS
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
KuPSTPS

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
KuPSTPS
50%2 goals33%
KuPSTPS
33%3 goals17%
KuPSTPS
11%4 goals0%
KuPSTPS

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
KuPSTPS
17%2 goals33%
KuPSTPS
6%3 goals11%
KuPSTPS
0%4 goals0%
KuPSTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
KuPSTPS
6%BTTS in both halves6%
KuPSTPS
28%Scored in both halves28%
KuPSTPS

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
KuPSTPS
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
KuPSTPS
40%BTTS - last 540%
KuPSTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KuPSTPS
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KuPSTPS
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
KuPSTPS

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
KuPSTPS
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
KuPSTPS
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
KuPSTPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.94 pts / match - KuPS · 1.06 pts / match - TPS

KuPS - half-time state
56% leading28% draw17% trailing
TPS - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.94Points per match (1st half)1.06
KuPSTPS
1.11Goals scored (1st half)0.61
KuPSTPS
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
KuPSTPS
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.22
KuPSTPS
61%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KuPSTPS
33%No goal before half-time56%
KuPSTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.44
KuPSTPS
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
KuPSTPS
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
KuPSTPS
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.17
KuPSTPS
56%Clean sheet after half-time56%
KuPSTPS
50%No goal after half-time39%
KuPSTPS

KuPS - second-half results

33% W44% R22% P
35
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

TPS - second-half results

33% W44% R22% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match2.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match2.41.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+100
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 11
TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
10
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.83
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaTPS
Average goals in match 2.722.60 2.39
Both teams scored 61%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%46% 50%
Clean sheets 33%28% 33%
Goal before half-time 83%76% 67%
Goal after half-time 72%77% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KuPS 1 - 0 - 0 TPS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

When do KuPS and TPS play?

KuPS face TPS on 9 August 2026 in Veikkausliiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs TPS?

KuPS score 1.83 goals per game on average and TPS 1.28. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 61% of KuPS's matches and 50% of TPS's.

What form are KuPS and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and TPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs TPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.