Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC: match statistics

KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KVC Westerlo play Royal Antwerp FC in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

KVC Westerlo: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Royal Antwerp FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KVC Westerlo scores 1.25 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Royal Antwerp FC scores 1.08 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KVC Westerlo 40%, Royal Antwerp FC 43%. Over 2.5: KVC Westerlo 43%, Royal Antwerp FC 40%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

KVC Westerlo has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.36. KVC Westerlo: 14.3 shots per match, Royal Antwerp FC: 12.1.

Match halves

KVC Westerlo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.75. Royal Antwerp FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

KVC Westerlo: 61-75 (11 goals). Royal Antwerp FC: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Westerlo has a statistical advantage in chance creation and finishing: at home they average 15.18 shots and 4.59 on target per match, translating to 1.18 goals scored with xG 1.67, while Antwerp away averages 10.06 shots and 3.29 on target, scoring 0.76 goals with xG 1.14. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 and conceded 3; their record is 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, yielding an average of 2.0 points per match, whereas the visitors scored 6 and conceded 6; their record is 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per match). Additionally, Antwerp away have 53% of matches without scoring, while Westerlo at home have 41% such matches; Antwerp also record a higher average xG against (1.68 vs 1.18), suggesting weaker defensive stability for the visitors. Considering the higher number of shots on target (4.59 vs 3.29), the xG advantage (1.67 vs 1.14) and better recent form (2.0 vs 1.2 points per match), I assess the probability of a home win at about 60%, a draw 25% and an away win 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
10Shots20
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
4Shots on target12
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.23xG2.47
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2Corners7
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
44Dangerous attacks50
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
11Fouls13
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
6Cards3
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.25Goals scored / match1.08
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.43Goals conceded / match1.2
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
49%Average possession49%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
4.65Shots on target / match4.2
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.35Shots per match12.1
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
4.65Shots on target4.2
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
8.7%Shot conversion8.9%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
49%Possession49%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.61xG for1.36
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.43xG against1.55
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Shooting quality

KVC Westerlo: AttackingRoyal Antwerp FC: Balanced
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KVC Westerlo
DLWLL
Season result split
35% W25% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-16
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-9
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Royal Antwerp FC
LLLDW
Season result split
33% W23% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-18
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-10
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KVC Westerlo is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - KVC Westerlo · 1.08 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC

Royal Antwerp FC is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - KVC Westerlo · 1.2 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo scoring profile: strong

KVC Westerlo scores in 65% of matches (26 of 40 matches), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (10 of 40 matches).

Royal Antwerp FC scoring profile: strong

Royal Antwerp FC scores in 60% of matches (24 of 40 matches), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (14 of 40 matches).

50Goals scored (season)43
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
57Goals conceded (season)48
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2.68Average goals in match2.28
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
5Goals scored (last 5)2
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
10Goals conceded (last 5)9
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal60%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
40%2 goals30%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
13%3 goals13%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
5%4 goals5%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal75%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
43%2 goals35%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
18%3 goals5%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
13%4 goals3%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Royal Antwerp FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 40 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time15%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
3%BTTS in both halves0%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
28%Scored in both halves20%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
40%BTTS - last 50%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KVC Westerlo is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KVC Westerlo · 1.05 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo - half-time state
35% leading28% draw38% trailing
Royal Antwerp FC - half-time state
20% leading45% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.05
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.48
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.05
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
55%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
60%No goal before half-time65%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.27
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.23
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
60%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
48%No goal after half-time55%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo - second-half results

38% W35% R28% P
53
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results

30% W38% R33% P
42
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KVC Westerlo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Royal Antwerp FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KVC Westerlo
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
5
9
16-30
6
17
31-45
9
4
46-60
11
9
61-75
10
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Royal Antwerp FC
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
8
6
16-30
8
12
31-45
10
9
46-60
4
6
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KVC Westerlo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Royal Antwerp FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

KVC WesterloLigaRoyal Antwerp FC
Average goals in match 2.682.67 2.28
Both teams scored 40%54% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%49% 40%
Clean sheets 35%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 70%
Goal after half-time 73%75% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): KVC Westerlo 2 - 0 - 1 Royal Antwerp FC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The Pro League match finished KVC Westerlo 2:4 Royal Antwerp FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KVC Westerlo and Royal Antwerp FC?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KVC Westerlo won 2, Royal Antwerp FC won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

KVC Westerlo score 1.25 goals per game on average and Royal Antwerp FC 1.08. The Pro League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 40% of KVC Westerlo's matches and 43% of Royal Antwerp FC's.

What form are KVC Westerlo and Royal Antwerp FC in?

Over the last 5 games KVC Westerlo have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Royal Antwerp FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The statistical background for KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.