Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe: match statistics
Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kyzyl-Zhar played Aktobe in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Kyzyl-Zhar: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Aktobe: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.05 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Aktobe scores 1.47 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.37 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 47%, Aktobe 47%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 53%, Aktobe 42%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Aktobe has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.17. Kyzyl-Zhar: 9.9 shots per match, Aktobe: 13.1.
Match halves
Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.79. Aktobe: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (7 goals). Aktobe: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.37 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kyzyl-Zhar (12th) is a narrow favorite based on home metrics: at home they average 1.6 goals per match with xG 1.34, while Aktobe (4th) register 1.13 goals and xG 1.05 away. The hosts average 4.8 shots on target and 11 total shots per home game, versus the visitors' 3 on target and 9 total, and the hosts’ shutout rate is 20% compared to 50% for the away side. Aktobe have the better form over the last 5 matches (1.8 pts per game and 10 goals) than Kyzyl-Zhar (0.8 pts per game and 5 goals), but their away numbers are poor (no clean sheets on the road and a -4 away goal differential). Defensively both teams concede at a very similar rate (1.6 vs 1.63 goals per game), so I expect an even match with a slight home advantage, hence a tip on the home win with significant draw risk.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because the short-term signal is clear: in the last 5 matches Kyzyl-Zhar had BTTS in 60% of games and Aktobe in 80%, giving an average trend of 70% in favor of both teams scoring. Aktobe scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match) and has a recent attacking xG of 1.35, while Kyzyl-Zhar has a recent attacking xG of 1.4 and a seasonal 6.45 shots on target per match, so both teams regularly create scoring opportunities. Seasonal indicators are mixed: seasonal BTTS is 45% for the home side and 50% for the away side; league BTTS level is 54%, but Kyzyl-Zhar has 55% clean sheets seasonally and a seasonal average of 0.73 goals conceded, giving them a theoretical defensive edge. Counterarguments are Aktobe’s seasonal share of matches without scoring at 50% and 0% clean sheets; however, recent results contradict this — the hosts conceded 9 goals in 5 matches (1.8 avg) while Aktobe scored 10 goals, which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. Weighing these signals, especially the short-term trend (60%/80%), elevated recent xG and Aktobe’s goal tally, and the league level of 54%, I favor the 'yes' scenario and price BTTS at 68% versus 32% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on average xG and goal statistics, I estimate expected goals of 1.70 for Kyzyl-Zhar and 1.15 for Aktobe, totaling 2.85 goals. The calculation considers the home attack xG of 1.77 and the away defensive xG of 1.62 (average ~1.70), and the away attack xG of 1.05 and the home defensive xG of 1.25 (average ~1.15). Seasonal indicators also support the over: Kyzyl-Zhar has 73% of matches over 1.5 goals, Aktobe 63%, and the league averages 44% of matches over 2.5 goals. In the last 5 matches Kyzyl-Zhar scored 5 and conceded 9 goals (total 14, average 2.8 per match), while Aktobe scored 10 and conceded 8 (total 18, average 3.6 per match); additionally BTTS in the last 5 is 60% and 80%. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 — the model assesses its probability at about 78%, Over 2.5 is a moderate 54% and Over 3.5 around 32%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the 1/1 scenario (home team leads at Half-Time and wins at Full-Time) because the home side led at the break in 6 of 11 home matches (55%), with an average of 0.64 goals scored by half-time and only 0.09 conceded, and 91% clean sheets at the break. After the break the home advantage is pronounced: average xG for the home team is 1.77 versus 1.05 for the visitors, 6.45 shots on target for the hosts compared to 3.0 for the guests, and a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.73 to 1.13. The points and win-rate records also favor the home team: on average 2.36 points per home match versus 0.63 for visitors, and a 73% home win rate versus 13% away, indicating that when they have a lead at the break they often convert it into the full three points. Therefore I assign the highest probability to 1/1 (47%), with lower chances for a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1 26%) or a half-time draw/full-time draw (X/X 13%); other scenarios, including a turnaround by the away team, I assess at a combined remaining 14%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Aktobe is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.8 pts / match - Aktobe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aktobe is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.05 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.47 goals / match - Aktobe
Aktobe is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.42 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.11 goals / match - Aktobe
Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
Aktobe scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kyzyl-Zhar
Over / Under — Aktobe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aktobe is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.58 pts / match - Aktobe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Aktobe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kyzyl-Zhar
Aktobe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Liga | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.47 | 2.37 | ▲ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 28% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 37% | 64% | • 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 70% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Kyzyl-Zhar 0 - 2 - 1 Aktobe. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 3:1 Aktobe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Aktobe?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 0, Aktobe won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe?
Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.05 goals per game on average and Aktobe 1.47. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.37 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 47% of Aktobe's.
What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Aktobe in?
Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Aktobe 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe?
The statistical background for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Aktobe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


