Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 15 October 2026

Lahti vs KuPS: match statistics

Lahti crest
Lahti
1 : 2half-time 1:2
KuPS crest
KuPS

Lahti vs KuPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lahti played KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Lahti: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. KuPS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lahti scores 1.16 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.79 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lahti 37%, KuPS 63%. Over 2.5: Lahti 26%, KuPS 42%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.44. Lahti: 12.7 shots per match, KuPS: 15.7.

Match halves

Lahti: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.47. KuPS: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Lahti: 0-15 (5 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KuPS lead the table and have suffered just 1 defeat in 19 matches this season, while Lahti have a record of 7 wins, 5 draws and 7 losses. The visitors create more chances away from home, averaging 16.33 shots and 6.78 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.94, compared with Lahti’s 13.3 shots, 4.3 shots on target and xG of 1.51 at home. Both defences are highly solid, with Lahti conceding 0.80 goals per match at home and KuPS 0.78 away, which increases the importance of a single goal. However, the hosts are in better short-term form, earning 10 points from their last 5 matches and conceding just 1 goal, while KuPS have collected 8 points and conceded 5 goals. KuPS’s edge in the quality of chances created, their away scoring rate of 1.67 goals per match and their consistency throughout the season give the visitors a slight advantage, although a draw remains a very realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The “No” pick holds a slight edge, as Lahti have conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS - Yes has not landed even once. KuPS scored an average of 1.2 goals during this period, but they will face a Lahti defence that has kept a clean sheet in 30% of their matches this season. The hosts do have a high seasonal BTTS rate of 70%, but their current run clearly lowers expectations of an opposition goal. KuPS create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.94 and 6.78 shots on target per match, so the probability of an away goal remains significant. Nevertheless, the two teams’ defences concede only 1.00 and 0.78 goals per game respectively this season, which slightly strengthens the scenario in which at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the low goal output in recent form: Lahti have averaged 1.2 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded over their last 5 matches, while KuPS have scored 1.2 goals and conceded an average of 1.0. None of Lahti’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals, while this occurred in only 20% of KuPS games. The seasonal attacking data is solid, with average xG of 1.75 for Lahti and 1.94 for KuPS, but the current xG figures for both teams have fallen to 1.50 and 1.36, respectively. Across the entire season, matches finishing Under 3.5 goals accounted for 70% of Lahti’s games and 78% of KuPS’s, clearly supporting the lower goal line. A projected total of 2.15 goals gives a clear betting edge to Under 3.5 goals, leaving a margin even for a 2:1 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Lahti have a strong first-half profile: they have led at the break in 6 of their 10 matches, scoring an average of 1.3 goals and conceding just 0.3. Away from home, KuPS have been trailing after 45 minutes in 33% of their matches, while their average number of goals conceded before half-time stands at 0.44, reinforcing the scenario of the hosts taking the initiative from the outset. The home side have won 60% of their matches this season and remain unbeaten, while their last five games have yielded just 0.2 goals conceded per match. Lahti do have a lower attacking xG than KuPS, 1.75 compared with 1.94, but they are more clinical, converting 13% of their shots into goals compared with the opponents' 10%. The most likely outcome is therefore Lahti leading at half-time and maintaining their winning advantage through to the final whistle, although KuPS's solid second-half performances reduce confidence in this scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
LahtiKuPS
11Shots12
LahtiKuPS
2Shots on target2
LahtiKuPS
1.18xG1.26
LahtiKuPS
3Corners4
LahtiKuPS
47Dangerous attacks49
LahtiKuPS
14Fouls10
LahtiKuPS
3Cards1
LahtiKuPS

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.16Goals scored / match1.79
LahtiKuPS
0.84Goals conceded / match0.89
LahtiKuPS
55%Average possession57%
LahtiKuPS
4.05Shots on target / match6
LahtiKuPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.68Shots per match15.68
LahtiKuPS
4.05Shots on target6
LahtiKuPS
9.1%Shot conversion11.4%
LahtiKuPS
55%Possession57%
LahtiKuPS
1.44xG for1.84
LahtiKuPS
1.25xG against1.23
LahtiKuPS

Shooting quality

Lahti: BalancedKuPS: Dominant
LahtiKuPS
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Lahti · 2.6 pts / match - KuPS

Lahti
WWLWD
Season result split
37% W26% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-7
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
KuPS
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W37% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-1
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Lahti · 1.79 goals / match - KuPS

Lahti is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.84 goals / match - Lahti · 0.89 goals / match - KuPS

Lahti scoring profile: strong

Lahti scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

22Goals scored (season)34
LahtiKuPS
16Goals conceded (season)17
LahtiKuPS
2Average goals in match2.68
LahtiKuPS
6Goals scored (last 5)11
LahtiKuPS
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
LahtiKuPS

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal89%
LahtiKuPS
32%2 goals47%
LahtiKuPS
5%3 goals32%
LahtiKuPS
5%4 goals11%
LahtiKuPS

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal68%
LahtiKuPS
21%2 goals16%
LahtiKuPS
5%3 goals5%
LahtiKuPS
0%4 goals0%
LahtiKuPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
LahtiKuPS
5%BTTS in both halves5%
LahtiKuPS
26%Scored in both halves26%
LahtiKuPS

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
LahtiKuPS
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
LahtiKuPS
0%BTTS - last 540%
LahtiKuPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
LahtiKuPS
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
LahtiKuPS
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
LahtiKuPS

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
LahtiKuPS
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
LahtiKuPS
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
LahtiKuPS

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / match - Lahti · 2 pts / match - KuPS

Lahti - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing
KuPS - half-time state
58% leading26% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)2
LahtiKuPS
0.68Goals scored (1st half)1.11
LahtiKuPS
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
LahtiKuPS
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.47
LahtiKuPS
68%Clean sheet before half-time63%
LahtiKuPS
47%No goal before half-time32%
LahtiKuPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.37
LahtiKuPS
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
LahtiKuPS
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
LahtiKuPS
0.95Average goals (2nd half)1.21
LahtiKuPS
63%Clean sheet after half-time53%
LahtiKuPS
58%No goal after half-time53%
LahtiKuPS

Lahti - second-half results

26% W47% D26% L
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - second-half results

32% W42% D26% L
38
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+8+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
10
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

LahtiLigaKuPS
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.59• 2.68
Both teams scored▼ 37%49%▲ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 26%46%▼ 42%
Clean sheets▲ 42%29%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 68%77%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▼ 63%76%▼ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiGoalOtso KoskinenAssist: Mamodou Sarr
  2. KuPSGoalTommi JyryAssist: Bob Nii Armah
  3. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  4. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Väinö VehkonenOff: José Claro Müller
  5. KuPSYellow cardValentín Román Gasc
  6. LahtiYellow cardRomain Sans
  7. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Justus OjanenOff: Romaric Yapi
  8. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Brahima MagassaOff: Saku Heiskanen
  9. LahtiYellow cardYohan Cassubie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lahti 0 - 0 - 1 KuPS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Lahti vs KuPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Lahti 1:2 KuPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lahti vs KuPS?

Lahti score 1.16 goals per game on average and KuPS 1.79. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Lahti's matches and 63% of KuPS's.

What form are Lahti and KuPS in?

Over the last 5 games Lahti have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KuPS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lahti vs KuPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.