Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Lahti vs TPS: match statistics

Lahti crest
Lahti
0 : 0half-time 0:0
TPS crest
TPS

Lahti vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lahti played TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 23 June 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Lahti: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. TPS: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lahti scores 1.27 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. TPS scores 1.09 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lahti 55%, TPS 55%. Over 2.5: Lahti 45%, TPS 36%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Lahti has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. Lahti: 12.4 shots per match, TPS: 10.1.

Match halves

Lahti: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.36. TPS: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Lahti: 0-15 (4 goals). TPS: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-1. Average goals 4.25, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a Lahti win: the hosts have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches versus just 3 for TPS, averaging 2.0 goals per match for Lahti compared to 0.6 for the visitors. At home Lahti averages 12.83 shots and 4.67 on target with a conversion rate of 14%, while TPS away records 11.6 shots, 3.6 on target and only 7% conversion. Lahti also posts higher expected goals at home (xG 1.5 vs xG 1.4 for TPS away) and dominates possession 57% to 48%, which indicates more clear-cut chances. Both defenses are numerically similar — Lahti concedes 1.33 goals at home on average, and TPS 1.4 away — but 40% of TPS’s away appearances end goalless for them, and the visitors have not yet won on the road. Considering Lahti’s 10 goals in the last 5 matches, superior finishing (14% vs 7%) and TPS’s poor away form (averaging 0.6 points per match in the last 5), I estimate probabilities: Lahti 65%, draw 20%, TPS 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TPS has low scoring capability: seasonal average 0.8 goals per match, only 0.6 in the last 5 games and just 7% shot conversion, which lowers their chances of scoring. Lahti at home averages 1.33 goals per match, has 50% clean sheets and a seasonal average of 0.67 goals conceded, and in the last 5 matches scored 10 goals with xG 1.95, so the hosts are the primary candidates to score. TPS in the last 5 matches scored only 3 goals and has average xG 1.21, despite taking 11.6 shots per match, showing chance creation with very low conversion. Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for Lahti and 60% for TPS, and the league has 51% BTTS, however in the last 5 matches of both teams BTTS occurred in only 40% of cases, indicating a trend toward lower chances for both teams to score. Considering TPS’s poor effectiveness (0.8/0.6 goals and 7% conversion) and Lahti’s high frequency of clean sheets (50% and 0.67 goals conceded at home), I give BTTS=no 60% and BTTS=yes 40%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast a total of around 2.30 goals: Lahti ~1.28 and TPS ~1.02. Lahti at home scores on average 1.33 goals with an xG of 1.21, while TPS scores 0.80 goals this season despite an xG of 1.40, indicating low conversion (7%) which limits their actual goal output. Lahti have 50% clean sheets at home, but their xG conceded is as high as 1.79, and TPS have no clean sheets away (0%), so I expect the visitors to threaten the hosts at least once. Both teams have high rates above 1.5 goals: Lahti 67% and TPS 60%, therefore the best signal is Over 1.5 (75%); Over 2.5 is less certain — based on seasonal Over 2.5 rates of 33% and 40% and the expected total of 2.30 I give a 44% chance for Over 2.5, while Over 3.5 is unlikely (around 10%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Lahti as hosts have won 67% of their home matches, while TPS have not recorded any away wins (0%), giving a clear home advantage. The hosts were level at half-time in 50% of matches and led at the break in 33% of them, and additionally kept a clean sheet at half-time in 83% of cases, whereas TPS concede on average 0.8 goals by the break. Lahti score on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home=1.0) and have 3 goals in the 46–60 minute interval compared to 0 for TPS, which increases the chance of a turnaround after half-time. Although xG is 1.21 for Lahti versus 1.4 for TPS, Lahti convert chances more efficiently (conversion rate 15% vs 7% and 4.0 shots on target vs 3.6), therefore the strongest signal is the X/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario (draw at half-time, Lahti win) as the best selection to play.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
LahtiTPS
10Shots8
LahtiTPS
2Shots on target4
LahtiTPS
1.09xG1.13
LahtiTPS
5Corners2
LahtiTPS
43Dangerous attacks47
LahtiTPS
15Fouls21
LahtiTPS
4Cards1
LahtiTPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.09
LahtiTPS
1.27Goals conceded / match1
LahtiTPS
55%Average possession46%
LahtiTPS
4.36Shots on target / match3.82
LahtiTPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.36Shots per match10.09
LahtiTPS
4.36Shots on target3.82
LahtiTPS
10.3%Shot conversion10.8%
LahtiTPS
55%Possession46%
LahtiTPS
1.42xG for1.3
LahtiTPS
1.27xG against1.57
LahtiTPS

Shooting quality

Lahti: BalancedTPS: Balanced
LahtiTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lahti is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Lahti · 0.6 pts / match - TPS

Lahti
DLWLL
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
TPS
LLWLL
Season result split
36% W27% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-4
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lahti is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Lahti · 1.09 goals / match - TPS

TPS is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Lahti · 1 goals / match - TPS

Lahti scoring profile: very strong

Lahti scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

14Goals scored (season)12
LahtiTPS
14Goals conceded (season)11
LahtiTPS
2.55Average goals in match2.09
LahtiTPS
9Goals scored (last 5)3
LahtiTPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
LahtiTPS

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
LahtiTPS
27%2 goals27%
LahtiTPS
9%3 goals0%
LahtiTPS
9%4 goals0%
LahtiTPS

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal73%
LahtiTPS
36%2 goals27%
LahtiTPS
9%3 goals0%
LahtiTPS
0%4 goals0%
LahtiTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time18%
LahtiTPS
9%BTTS in both halves9%
LahtiTPS
18%Scored in both halves27%
LahtiTPS

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
LahtiTPS
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LahtiTPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
LahtiTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
LahtiTPS
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
LahtiTPS
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
LahtiTPS

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
LahtiTPS
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
LahtiTPS
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LahtiTPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - Lahti · 1.09 pts / match - TPS

Lahti - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing
TPS - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.09
LahtiTPS
0.91Goals scored (1st half)0.36
LahtiTPS
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
LahtiTPS
1.45Average goals (1st half)0.82
LahtiTPS
55%Clean sheet before half-time64%
LahtiTPS
36%No goal before half-time64%
LahtiTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.55
LahtiTPS
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
LahtiTPS
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
LahtiTPS
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.27
LahtiTPS
45%Clean sheet after half-time45%
LahtiTPS
73%No goal after half-time27%
LahtiTPS

Lahti - second-half results

9% W45% R45% P
16
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

TPS - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
TPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

TPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
3
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.32
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

LahtiLigaTPS
Average goals in match 2.552.56 2.09
Both teams scored 55%51% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%46% 36%
Clean sheets 18%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 82%74% 55%
Goal after half-time 64%77% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardRomain Sans
  2. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  3. TPSYellow cardOscar Häggström
  4. TPSSubstitutionOn: Samuel Anini JrOff: Elmer Vauhkonen
  5. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi
  6. LahtiYellow cardYohan Cassubie
  7. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Luke Ivanovic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Lahti 0 - 3 - 1 TPS. Average goals 4.25, both teams scored in 100% matches.

TPS
2 : 1
Lahti
Turun Palloseura
3 : 3
FC Lahti
FC Lahti
2 : 2
Turun Palloseura
Turun Palloseura
2 : 2
FC Lahti

FAQ

What was the result of Lahti vs TPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Lahti 0:0 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lahti and TPS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Lahti won 0, TPS won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lahti vs TPS?

Lahti score 1.27 goals per game on average and TPS 1.09. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Lahti's matches and 55% of TPS's.

What form are Lahti and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games Lahti have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and TPS 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lahti vs TPS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lahti vs TPS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.