United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington: match statistics

Las Vegas Lights crest
Las Vegas Lights
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Lexington crest
Lexington

Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Las Vegas Lights played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Las Vegas Lights: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lexington: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Las Vegas Lights scores 1.57 and concedes 2.14 goals per match. Lexington scores 0.86 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Las Vegas Lights 86%, Lexington 43%. Over 2.5: Las Vegas Lights 57%, Lexington 43%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lexington has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.20. Las Vegas Lights: 9.3 shots per match, Lexington: 11.6.

Match halves

Las Vegas Lights: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.14. Lexington: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Las Vegas Lights: 61-75 (3 goals). Lexington: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win for Las Vegas Lights; at home they have 50% wins, 50% draws and 0% losses, scoring on average 1.0 goals and conceding only 0.5 goals per match. Their home xG is 1.41 versus an xG against of 0.86, and the hosts average 12.5 shots and 5.0 on target per game with a conversion rate of 8%. Lexington have no away wins (0%), draws account for 67% of results, and away the visitors average 0.33 goals per match and fail to score in 67% of their road games. The visitors have lower chance-creation (2.67 shots on target, conversion 4%) and a higher xG against (1.33) and concede on average 1.0 goal away, which limits their prospects. Considering the superior quality of chances and finishing of the home side alongside the visitors’ scoring issues, I rate the probability at 62% for a home win, 23% for a draw and 15% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches the home side had BTTS in 80% of cases and the away side in 60%, which is a strong, current signal for both teams to score. Although for the season the away team has only 33% BTTS and averages 0.33 goals per game (67% of matches without scoring), their last 5 shows improvement: 6 goals (1.2 per game) and average xG 1.51 versus the hosts' 1.37. The home team have scored 7 goals in their last 5 (1.4 per game) and concede on average 1.8, while seasonally they have 1.25 scored and 1.25 conceded per game, which favors goal exchanges. Additionally, seasonal stats show the home side generates more chances (xG 1.49 vs 1.07, shots 13.5 vs 9.0, on target 4.25 vs 2.67) and the league BTTS rate is 52%, therefore I ultimately predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG indicate total expected goals of 2.62 — home side 1.41 (xG_for 1.49 vs xG_against_away 1.33) versus visitors 1.21 (xG_for 1.07 vs xG_against_home 1.35). Las Vegas has a clear shooting superiority: 13.5 shots and 4.25 on target per game compared to Lexington’s 9.0 shots and 2.67 on target, with conversion rates of 9% vs 4%, which increases the hosts’ chance to capitalize on chances. Both teams record high season percentages of matches over 1.5 goals: Las Vegas 75% and Lexington 67%, while the league average is 2.63 goals per game, all of which boost the probability of exceeding the 1.5 line. The 2.5 line is moderately plausible — expected 2.62 goals and Las Vegas’s season Over 2.5 at 75% (but Lexington 0%) suggest an edge toward Over 2.5, though confidence is lower than for 1.5. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: over at 1.5), assessed at 82% probability; Over 3.5 is unlikely (22%) given season values of 25%/0%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time a draw is the most likely: the home side average 0.25 goals by the break versus 0.33 for the visitors, and the hosts have kept a clean half in 75% of matches compared to 67% for the opponents, indicating frequent low-scoring first halves. After the break Las Vegas shows an offensive edge — xG 1.49 versus 1.07, on average 13.5 shots versus 9.0 and 4.25 shots on target versus 2.67, and a higher conversion rate 9% versus 4%, which increases the probability of home goals in the second half. The hosts score an average of 1.0 goals in second halves compared to 0.0 for the visitors and have collected 5 points after the break versus 1 point for the away side (5 vs 1), supporting a scenario in which the home team stages a turnaround after a half-time draw. Additionally the visitors have no away wins (0% wins) and score only 0.33 goals on the road, so the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at half and home win by full-time (X/1) is the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Las Vegas LightsLexington
8Shots14
Las Vegas LightsLexington
3Shots on target5
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.06xG1.79
Las Vegas LightsLexington
2Corners2
Las Vegas LightsLexington
45Dangerous attacks76
Las Vegas LightsLexington
11Fouls15
Las Vegas LightsLexington
6Cards3
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.57Goals scored / match0.86
Las Vegas LightsLexington
2.14Goals conceded / match1.14
Las Vegas LightsLexington
52%Average possession53%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
3.43Shots on target / match3.57
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.29Shots per match11.57
Las Vegas LightsLexington
3.43Shots on target3.57
Las Vegas LightsLexington
16.9%Shot conversion7.4%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
52%Possession53%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.2xG for1.31
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.3xG against1.34
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Shooting quality

Las Vegas Lights: Efficient finishingLexington: Balanced
Las Vegas LightsLexington
Accuracy (shots on target)37%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1 pts / match - Lexington

Las Vegas Lights
LWLDL
Season result split
14% W29% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Lexington
WLDLD
Season result split
14% W43% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-3
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
LDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Las Vegas Lights is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights · 0.86 goals / match - Lexington

Lexington is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.14 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1.14 goals / match - Lexington

Las Vegas Lights scoring profile: very strong

Las Vegas Lights scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Lexington scoring profile: strong

Lexington scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Las Vegas Lights keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

11Goals scored (season)6
Las Vegas LightsLexington
15Goals conceded (season)8
Las Vegas LightsLexington
3.71Average goals in match2
Las Vegas LightsLexington
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Las Vegas LightsLexington
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Las Vegas LightsLexington

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal57%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%2 goals14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
0%3 goals14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
0%4 goals0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%2 goals43%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%3 goals14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
14%4 goals0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
29%BTTS in both halves0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
29%Scored in both halves0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
80%BTTS - last 540%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 126% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1.29 pts / match - Lexington

Las Vegas Lights - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Lexington - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)1.29
Las Vegas LightsLexington
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.43Average goals (1st half)0.71
Las Vegas LightsLexington
29%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
57%No goal before half-time71%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.86
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Las Vegas LightsLexington
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Las Vegas LightsLexington
2.29Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Las Vegas LightsLexington
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Las Vegas LightsLexington
14%No goal after half-time71%
Las Vegas LightsLexington

Las Vegas Lights - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lexington - second-half results

14% W43% R43% P
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Las Vegas Lights - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Las Vegas Lights
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-82%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Las Vegas Lights

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Las Vegas LightsLigaLexington
Average goals in match 3.712.73 2.00
Both teams scored 86%54% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%54% 43%
Clean sheets 14%28% 43%
Goal before half-time 71%66% 57%
Goal after half-time 86%82% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LexingtonGoalAaron MolloyAssist: Blaine Ferri
  2. Las Vegas LightsGoalJohnny RodriguezAssist: Christian Pinzon Barajas
  3. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardAaron Guillen
  4. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardJohnny Rodriguez
  5. LexingtonYellow cardBlaine Ferri
  6. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardOalex Anderson
  7. Las Vegas LightsGoalChristian Pinzon BarajasAssist: Oalex Anderson
  8. LexingtonYellow cardLatif Blessing
  9. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardCharles Lanphier
  10. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Benjamin OfeimuOff: Nathaniel Jones
  11. LexingtonYellow cardXavier Zengue
  12. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Jonathan LewisOff: Marcus Epps
  13. Las Vegas LightsRed cardMarc Ybarra
  14. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Carson LockerOff: Christian Pinzon Barajas
  15. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Nighte PickeringOff: Johnny Rodriguez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Las Vegas Lights 1 - 1 - 0 Lexington. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Las Vegas Lights FC
1 : 0
Lexington SC
Lexington SC
0 : 0
Las Vegas Lights FC

FAQ

What was the result of Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington?

The USL Championship match finished Las Vegas Lights 2:1 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Las Vegas Lights and Lexington?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Las Vegas Lights won 1, Lexington won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington?

Las Vegas Lights score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lexington 0.86. The USL Championship average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Las Vegas Lights's matches and 43% of Lexington's.

What form are Las Vegas Lights and Lexington in?

Over the last 5 games Las Vegas Lights have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lexington 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington?

The statistical background for Las Vegas Lights vs Lexington — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.