Lexington vs Colorado Springs: match statistics
Lexington vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lexington played Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lexington 64%, Colorado Springs 71%. Over 2.5: Lexington 64%, Colorado Springs 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.43. Lexington: 12.2 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.5.
Match halves
Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14.
Goals by minute
Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). Colorado Springs: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lexington are clearly more effective at home, averaging 1.73 goals per match, while Colorado Springs score just 1.10 goals per away game. The hosts have won 64% of their home matches and kept a clean sheet in 55% of them, whereas the visitors have lost as many as 60% of their away fixtures and have failed to concede in only one out of ten. The difference is also reflected in their current form: Lexington have collected 10 points from their last five matches, winning 3 times and conceding just 3 goals, while Colorado Springs have lost 3 of their last 5 games and conceded 9 goals. The home side also create more high-quality chances on their own turf, with an average xG of 1.58 compared with Colorado Springs’ 1.47 away from home, while their shot conversion rate stands at 13% versus 8% for their opponents. The visitors fail to score in 40% of their away matches, making a Lexington victory the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Lexington have very strong attacking potential at home: they score an average of 1.91 goals, create 2.11 xG, and record 6.09 shots on target per match, making their goal highly likely. However, Colorado Springs is the key factor for this market, having scored only 1.0 goal per match in their last 5 fixtures and failing to score in 40% of their appearances throughout the season. The hosts have clearly improved defensively in their recent form, conceding just 0.6 goals per match across their last 5 fixtures, while their season-long xG against is a low 0.92. Although Lexington’s season BTTS rate stands at 73%, BTTS landed in only 20% of the last five matches involving both teams, indicating a significant shift towards tighter results. The most likely scenario, therefore, is that Lexington will score, but Colorado Springs will fail to respond—supporting BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Lexington have a clear offensive edge against their opponents’ defense: they score an average of 1.91 goals per match, while Colorado Springs concede 1.80. The hosts also create chances worth an average of 2.11 xG and register 6.09 shots on target per game, whereas the visitors have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. Colorado Springs score an average of 1.10 goals, but Lexington allow opponents just 0.92 xG, so the larger share of the projected 2.60 goals is expected to come from the hosts. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 82% of Lexington’s matches and 70% of Colorado Springs’ games, making it the strongest signal in the available data. Lexington’s recent form has been more defensive, with only 20% of matches going Over 2.5 goals across the last five rounds, so higher lines do not offer the same clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Lexington win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 82% and 70% of their matches, respectively, and this occurred in 100% of their last five games. The opening stages are usually cautious: Lexington average 0.55 goals before the break and Colorado Springs 0.40, with the combined average standing at just 1.0 and 0.9 goals, respectively. After the interval, the home side’s advantage increases significantly: they score an average of 1.36 goals compared with the visitors’ 0.70, collecting an average of 2.0 points per match in this period against just 0.6 for their opponents. Lexington also have a clearly stronger full-match profile, averaging 1.91 goals scored and an xG of 2.11, while Colorado Springs concede an average of 1.80 goals and have lost 60% of their matches. In their last five appearances, the hosts won 60% of their games and conceded only 0.6 goals per match, whereas the visitors lost 60% and allowed their opponents to score 1.8 goals.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lexington | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Lexington · 1.71 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Lexington is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Lexington · 1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Colorado Springs scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lexington
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lexington is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Lexington · 1.07 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lexington
Colorado Springs
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Lexington | Liga | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Lexington 1 - 1 - 1 Colorado Springs. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lexington vs Colorado Springs?
The USL Championship match finished Lexington 0:1 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Colorado Springs?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Lexington won 1, Colorado Springs won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Colorado Springs?
Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.71. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 71% of Colorado Springs's.
What form are Lexington and Colorado Springs in?
Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Colorado Springs 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Colorado Springs?
The statistical background for Lexington vs Colorado Springs — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


