United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 31 August 2026

Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Las Vegas Lights crest
Las Vegas Lights

Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lexington played Las Vegas Lights in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Las Vegas Lights: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Las Vegas Lights scores 1.53 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lexington 64%, Las Vegas Lights 80%. Over 2.5: Lexington 64%, Las Vegas Lights 67%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Lexington has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. Lexington: 12.2 shots per match, Las Vegas Lights: 10.7.

Match halves

Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Las Vegas Lights: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). Las Vegas Lights: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lexington have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 60% of their home matches, score an average of 1.7 goals and concede 1.2, while Las Vegas Lights allow opponents 1.9 goals per away game. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 14 shots and 4.7 on target, with an xG of 1.59; away from home, the visitors manage just 9.2 shots, 3.1 on target and an xG of 1.19. Lexington have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches, compared with just 20% of Las Vegas Lights’ away fixtures, further strengthening the case for a goalscoring edge for the hosts. However, the visitors are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, collecting 11 points and conceding just 2 goals, so the risk of a draw or an effective counterattacking performance from Las Vegas Lights remains significant. Despite Las Vegas’ strong current run, Lexington’s advantage in chance-creation quality and home defensive solidity gives the hosts a slightly greater chance of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data favors goals at both ends: Lexington have recorded BTTS in 60% of their matches, while Las Vegas Lights have done so in as many as 80%, compared with the league average of 53%. The visitors average 1.6 goals per match and have not been held scoreless in any game, while Lexington should be able to exploit a defense conceding an average of 1.9 goals. The hosts also create more chances, with an average xG of 1.42 and 4.0 shots on target, whereas Las Vegas allow opponents an xG of 1.56. The risk to the pick is the teams' recent defensive form, as they have conceded only 0.6 and 0.4 goals respectively over their last five matches, with BTTS occurring in 20% and 40% of those games. However, the full-season profile still points slightly more strongly to both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 2.30-goal projection is based on Lexington’s xG of 1.42 and Las Vegas’ xG conceded of 1.56, combined with the hosts’ solid defensive record of conceding just 0.9 goals per game over the season. Recent form clearly limits the scoring potential: in their last five matches, Lexington scored 6 and conceded 3 goals, while Las Vegas scored 5 and conceded just 2. Over 2.5 goals landed in only 20% of the last five matches for each team, while the hosts recorded fewer than 3.5 goals in 90% of their matches throughout the season. Las Vegas has a higher seasonal average of 1.6 goals scored, but away from home they will face a team that has kept a clean sheet in 40% of its matches. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals is the strongest selection, as the current defensive data for both sides points more strongly towards a match with a maximum of three goals than an open, high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The Half-Time/Full-Time draw is strongly supported by Lexington’s profile, as they were level at the break in 7 of their 10 league matches this season and went into half-time all square in each of their last five games. Over that same period, the hosts averaged just 0.4 goals scored and 0.4 conceded before the break, while Las Vegas averaged 0.6 scored and 0.4 conceded. After the interval, both teams have recently been very solid defensively: Lexington concede an average of 0.2 goals, while Las Vegas have not conceded a single goal in the second halves of their last five matches. Although the hosts have the better average xG, 1.42 compared with 1.19, the visitors are unbeaten in their last five fixtures and drew 40% of those matches, increasing the likelihood of the game remaining level through to full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
-1Shots-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
-1Shots on target-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0xG0
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
-1Corners-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0Dangerous attacks0
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
-1Fouls-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
-1Cards-1
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.57Goals scored / match1.53
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.43Goals conceded / match1.73
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
51%Average possession51%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
4.36Shots on target / match3.6
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.21Shots per match10.73
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
4.36Shots on target3.6
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
12.9%Shot conversion14.3%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
51%Possession51%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.43xG for1.32
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.34xG against1.4
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Shooting quality

Lexington: BalancedLas Vegas Lights: Efficient finishing
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lexington · 1.4 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights

Lexington
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Las Vegas Lights
DWLLW
Season result split
33% W20% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Lexington · 1.73 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Las Vegas Lights keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Las Vegas Lights scoring profile: very strong

Las Vegas Lights scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

22Goals scored (season)23
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
20Goals conceded (season)26
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
3Average goals in match3.27
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
12Goals scored (last 5)7
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal93%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
36%2 goals60%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
29%3 goals0%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
14%4 goals0%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal80%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
43%2 goals47%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
21%3 goals40%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
7%4 goals7%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

80%
Las Vegas Lights - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time47%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0%BTTS in both halves20%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
21%Scored in both halves33%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
80%BTTS - last 580%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Lexington · 1.13 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights

Lexington - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing
Las Vegas Lights - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.13
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.67
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.47
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
64%Clean sheet before half-time33%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
57%No goal before half-time40%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.2
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.8
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
36%Clean sheet after half-time47%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights
43%No goal after half-time33%
LexingtonLas Vegas Lights

Lexington - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Las Vegas Lights - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Las Vegas Lights - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Las Vegas Lights
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Las Vegas Lights

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaLas Vegas Lights
Average goals in match 3.002.79 3.27
Both teams scored 64%58% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%52% 67%
Clean sheets 29%26% 20%
Goal before half-time 71%67% 80%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LexingtonYellow cardPhillip Goodrum
  2. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardBenjamin Ofeimu
  3. LexingtonGoalMarcus EppsAssist: Phillip Goodrum
  4. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Malcolm FryOff: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  5. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardJohnny Rodriguez
  6. LexingtonYellow cardOliver Semmle
  7. Las Vegas LightsSubstitutionOn: Blake PopeOff: Themi Antonoglou
  8. LexingtonYellow cardMalcolm Fry
  9. LexingtonYellow cardJavain Okemio Brown
  10. Las Vegas LightsYellow cardNykolas Sessock

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Lexington 0 - 1 - 2 Las Vegas Lights. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Las Vegas Lights FC
2 : 1
Lexington SC
Las Vegas Lights FC
1 : 0
Lexington SC
Lexington SC
0 : 0
Las Vegas Lights FC

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 2:0 Las Vegas Lights. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Las Vegas Lights?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Lexington won 0, Las Vegas Lights won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights?

Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Las Vegas Lights 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 80% of Las Vegas Lights's.

What form are Lexington and Las Vegas Lights in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Las Vegas Lights 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lexington vs Las Vegas Lights: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.