United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 20 October 2026

Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Tulsa Roughnecks crest
Tulsa Roughnecks

Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lexington played Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 9 October 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Lexington: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Tulsa Roughnecks: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lexington scores 1.81 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.19 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lexington 56%, Tulsa Roughnecks 44%. Over 2.5: Lexington 59%, Tulsa Roughnecks 30%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Lexington has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.30. Lexington: 14.2 shots per match, Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.7.

Match halves

Lexington: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.11. Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Lexington: 76-90+ (12 goals). Tulsa Roughnecks: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lexington have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 18 goals in that run, while Tulsa Roughnecks have managed just 1 win and scored 6 goals. Home advantage strengthens the case for the hosts: they win 64% of their home matches and score an average of 2 goals, while the visitors win 31% of their away matches and average 1.38 goals. Lexington also create better scoring chances, posting an average home xG of 1.80 compared with Tulsa’s 1.34 away from home. Defensively, the hosts concede an average of 1 goal at home and keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, compared with 1.31 goals conceded and clean sheets in 23% of the visitors’ away matches. The draw remains a significant risk, as Tulsa have drawn 38% of their away matches and 3 of their last 5 games.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches played by the two teams, both sides scored in 80% of games, which is the strongest indicator in favor of BTTS - Yes. Lexington averaged 3.6 goals during this period, while Tulsa conceded 1.2, making a home goal seem likely. The visitors averaged 1.2 goals across their last 5 appearances, while Lexington conceded 1.4, which also gives grounds to expect them to score. However, caution is warranted: over the season, Lexington kept a clean sheet in 57% of its matches, and both teams scored in only 29% of its games, compared with 62% for Tulsa. Therefore, the edge for a both-teams-to-score outcome is slight and rests primarily on their current scoring form.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Lexington have scored 18 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.6 per game, while their average xG over that period was 2.51. This form points to goals, although Lexington average only 1.0 goal at home, so I do not expect them to maintain their recent scoring rate. Tulsa average 1.38 goals away from home, but the hosts concede just 0.57 at home and keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches, which limits the forecast for the visitors’ goals. Over 1.5 goals is the safest pick: it has landed in 69% of Tulsa’s away matches, and each of Lexington’s last 5 matches has produced at least 3 goals. The case for a higher line is weaker, as only 14% of Lexington’s home matches finished Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Lexington taking a lead at the break and holding it through to the end of the match. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 7 of 14 matches and were never trailing, conceding an average of just 0.07 goals before the break; Tulsa conceded an average of 0.54 goals over the same period. Recent form supports Lexington maintaining its lead: the team won 4 of its last 5 matches and averaged 2.2 goals after half-time in those games, compared with Tulsa’s 0.2. The pick is not certain, however, as the visitors led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, and their average xG is 1.34, compared with 1.26 for the hosts. A half-time draw followed by a Lexington win therefore remains a notable alternative, but the full-season first-half results and recent form point primarily to 1/1 in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
16Shots5
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
4Shots on target1
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.98xG0.78
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
3Corners1
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
95Dangerous attacks53
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
12Fouls12
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1Cards1
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.81Goals scored / match1.19
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.22Goals conceded / match0.93
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
51%Average possession44%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
4.96Shots on target / match3.44
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.15Shots per match10.74
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
4.96Shots on target3.44
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
12.8%Shot conversion11%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
51%Possession44%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.63xG for1.3
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.34xG against1.3
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Shooting quality

Lexington: AttackingTulsa Roughnecks: Balanced
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Lexington · 1.2 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Lexington
LWWWW
Season result split
48% W15% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-10
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-1-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.54Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Tulsa Roughnecks
LDDWD
Season result split
41% W33% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-7
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

1.81 goals / match - Lexington · 1.19 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Tulsa Roughnecks is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.22 goals / match - Lexington · 0.93 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Lexington scoring profile: strong

Lexington scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 matches).

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: strong

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

49Goals scored (season)32
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
33Goals conceded (season)25
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
3.04Average goals in match2.11
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
18Goals scored (last 5)6
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal70%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
48%2 goals26%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
33%3 goals11%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
15%4 goals7%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal59%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
37%2 goals22%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
15%3 goals4%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
4%4 goals4%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
Tulsa Roughnecks - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 27 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time11%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
4%BTTS in both halves4%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
30%Scored in both halves19%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
80%BTTS - last 580%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Lexington · 1.67 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks

Lexington - half-time state
26% leading52% draw22% trailing
Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
41% leading44% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.67
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.59
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.89
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
67%Clean sheet before half-time78%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
59%No goal before half-time48%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.3
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.22
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
44%Clean sheet after half-time52%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks
33%No goal after half-time63%
LexingtonTulsa Roughnecks

Lexington - second-half results

41% W30% D30% L
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

30% W41% D30% L
45
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match1.42.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match2.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+4+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
5
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
10
8
61-75
12
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaTulsa Roughnecks
Average goals in match▲ 3.042.72▼ 2.11
Both teams scored▲ 56%54%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 59%50%▼ 30%
Clean sheets▲ 33%27%▲ 41%
Goal before half-time▼ 59%66%▼ 63%
Goal after half-time▲ 85%78%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Jeorgio KocevskiOff: William Wilson
  2. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Braudílio Pina RodriguesOff: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  3. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Giordano ColliOff: Arquimides Ordonez
  4. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Milo YosefOff: Malcolm Fry
  5. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Delentz PierreOff: Jamie Craig Webber
  6. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardJeorgio Kocevski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Lexington 0 - 1 - 2 Tulsa Roughnecks. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tulsa Roughnecks
0 : 0
Lexington
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
3 : 0
Lexington SC
Lexington SC
0 : 2
Tulsa Roughnecks FC

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 0:0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Tulsa Roughnecks?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Lexington won 0, Tulsa Roughnecks won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Lexington score 1.81 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.19. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Lexington's matches and 44% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.

What form are Lexington and Tulsa Roughnecks in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lexington vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.